Started By
Message

Prosecutors Challenge Judge in Comey Case Ruling

Posted on 11/17/25 at 4:41 pm
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
16902 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 4:41 pm
quote:

Federal prosecutors argued that a magistrate judge might have misinterpreted key facts in the James Comey case, as the judge warned of what he called "profound investigative missteps" that could have tainted the proceedings.

"The government's position is that disclosure of grand jury materials is not warranted under the facts presented to the Magistrate Judge," prosecutors said in their filing.

The Justice Department sought an emergency stay of the order. Prosecutors said the disclosure was not warranted under the facts and argued that the judge's analysis might have relied on incorrect interpretations.




Lindsey Halligan says, "Hold My Beer"!!

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
161769 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 5:25 pm to
I will not go in ivory and SFP's thread, you can't see through all the splooge.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
161769 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 5:48 pm to
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
5503 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 6:25 pm to
This judge thinking he wasn't going to be scrutinized is foolish.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
16902 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 6:41 pm to
I have not looked at it yet but splooge ......

Posted by Neutral Underground
Member since Mar 2024
2642 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 6:43 pm to
The judge should recuse himself. He is obviously biased.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464103 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

He is obviously biased.

Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7375 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:11 pm to
Victory for DOJ...at least for now...judge stayed the magistrate's order pending further consideration. DOJ has until Wednesday to brief. Comey has to respond by Friday.

Judge Stays Magistrate's Order in Comey Case (CNBC)
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 7:14 pm
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
32204 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:13 pm to
There he is. With the expected response. NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
45693 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

He is obviously biased.


quote:

SlowFlowPro


Actually, you're partially correct. He's no more biased than you are.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464103 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:18 pm to
There are much more details discussions in the other thread without the silliness found so far in this one
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
12458 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:23 pm to
I'm by no means an expert in judicial proceedings, how often do judges challenge evidence presented by the prosecution?
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
27830 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

a magistrate judge



I'm not sure I understand what this means in this context. Are they trying him in traffic court? Is a federal magistrate a judge or not?
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 7:27 pm
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
1000 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure I understand what this means in this context. Are they trying him in traffic court? Is a federal magistrate a judge or not?


A federal magistrate judge is a federal judge but much different than a district court judges. They are hired by the district judges rather than appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They will handle preliminary matters. In this case, the discovery request for the GJ records. They will not rule on the motions to dismiss

This motion and hearing is in the discovery matter issued by the magistrate judge
Posted by tiggerfan02 2021
HSV
Member since Jan 2021
3846 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:45 pm to
You are an absolutely insufferable douche.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
16902 posts
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

I'm by no means an expert in judicial proceedings, how often do judges challenge evidence presented by the prosecution?


Without a blatant effort by prosecutors, hardly ever next to never. It is the defense that presents such challenge.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
27830 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:50 am to
quote:

dukkbill



Thank you.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
7677 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:38 am to
quote:

There are much more details discussions in the other thread without the silliness found so far in this one


typical of your blather
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8588 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:55 am to
quote:


I will not go in ivory and SFP's thread, you can't see through all the splooge.


Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7128 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 10:09 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram