- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will we get to see gay marriage get overturned in the SC?
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:41 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:41 am
Seems like support for it is going down. Feels good to be vindicated on gay marriage leading to a slippery slope though.
Marriage is one man and one woman.
Marriage is one man and one woman.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:46 am to TigersHuskers
Would be dumb to help democrats AGAIN
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:46 am to TigersHuskers
It's disgusting irrational nonsense.
It should be.
It should be.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:47 am to TigersHuskers
Won't happen, I don't think.
Affects too many that are already married.
Abortion was different as it is a temporary situation.
Affects too many that are already married.
Abortion was different as it is a temporary situation.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:48 am to TigersHuskers
The decision allowing it was terrible. But that toothpaste ain’t going back in the tube.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:52 am to TigersHuskers
quote:
Will we get to see gay marriage get overturned in the SC
No we're not going to make Bunk and Roger get a divorce.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:53 am to TigersHuskers
Hopefully, and soon. It should have never been allowed.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:57 am to TigersHuskers
The government cannot interfere with what a church/pastor does, ceremoniously.
If you are arguing that the government should stop gay people from being able to be legally unionized, that isn't really freedom. That's statism.
If you're arguing for statism, fine. Not that I agree with that, but it would be a case to bring.
As far as God is concerned, a man doing a ceremony does not make it recognized by He, or blessed. That is His decision alone.
That's all I got!
If you are arguing that the government should stop gay people from being able to be legally unionized, that isn't really freedom. That's statism.
If you're arguing for statism, fine. Not that I agree with that, but it would be a case to bring.
As far as God is concerned, a man doing a ceremony does not make it recognized by He, or blessed. That is His decision alone.
That's all I got!
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:01 pm to TigersHuskers
Hopefully
...but not before mid terms.
The flamers will march. ...expect large runs on lube and cucumbers.
...but not before mid terms.
The flamers will march. ...expect large runs on lube and cucumbers.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:02 pm to TigersHuskers
Who cares ?
People get worked up about the dumbest shite.
People get worked up about the dumbest shite.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:03 pm to TigersHuskers
Who knows, never should’ve never been passed. It’s the foolishness of politicians, literally abandoning God’s word.
They can have a civil union (homosexuality is a sin). No one will always agree. Allow room for grace.
But don’t dishonor God’s word. That is bad for everybody. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
They can have a civil union (homosexuality is a sin). No one will always agree. Allow room for grace.
But don’t dishonor God’s word. That is bad for everybody. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:05 pm to TigersHuskers
What would happen to the existing gay marriage licenses? Null and void?
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:06 pm to Your QB1
quote:
People get worked up about the dumbest shite.
It's not dumb... that decision, made by judges rather than the population or representatives, has had many negative knock on effects. There's no undoing it- but it was **never** the USSC's role to do this.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:22 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
People get worked up about the dumbest shite.
It's not dumb... that decision, made by judges rather than the population or representatives, has had many negative knock on effects. There's no undoing it- but it was **never** the USSC's role to do this.
Things that I care about....crime, taxes, the economy, the border.
Things I don't care about....figs getting married
Figs getting married doesn't change my life, it doesn't change your life.
So why do you care ?
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:24 pm to TigersHuskers
quote:
Marriage is one man and one woman.
The unchanging one true God who never changes his mind because his morality is perfect does permit multiple wives and concubines and in some cases commands it such as if your brother dies childless, you must “go in unto” (boink) your sister in law and take her as a wife.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 12:58 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:no you are wrong. learn to read better.
The unchanging one true God who never changes his mind because his morality is perfect does permit multiple wives and concubines and in some cases commands it such as if your brother dies childless, you must “go in unto” (boink) your sister in law and take her as a wife.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 1:06 pm to TigersHuskers
America can never re-achieve its former greatness until it jettisons the grotesque depravity of legally and morally equating two homos as being the same as a husband-and-wife, the very building block of civilization. Opened the door to all this sick insanity in the first place. Drag-queen storytimes, dudes in girls restrooms, child mutilations worthy of Josef Mengele. Made the whole country a vomitous hell.
Will it do so? Probably not. The country is too comfortable normalizing and then wallowing in its degeneracy, and will undoubtedly ride this horse into the abyss.
Will it do so? Probably not. The country is too comfortable normalizing and then wallowing in its degeneracy, and will undoubtedly ride this horse into the abyss.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 1:09 pm to SallysHuman
quote:In your opinion, it is NOT the purview of SCOTUS to determine the extent of Equal Protection and Due Process guaranteed by the 14th Amendment?
it was **never** the USSC's role to do this.
OK. That is certainly ... an opinion.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 1:10 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
It's disgusting irrational nonsense.
It should be.
Although I agree with you, it's like number 635 on my list of important.
Popular
Back to top

18









