Started By
Message
locked post

Is it fair to criticize Austin Thomas for how this roster looks?

Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:09 pm
Posted by bwats28
Member since Dec 2020
2 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:09 pm
I'll start off by giving credit where credit is due. We did good on the defensive side of the ball in the portal. But the roster management on offense just feels poorly handled.

We spent a good chunk of money on guys like Nic Anderson, Barion Brown, Bauer Sharp, and Donovan Green who haven’t produced anywhere near the level we all expected. Destyn Hill got hurt the first drive against Clemson and we haven’t seen him since. It’s frustrating seeing these guys come in with a lot of hype and barely contribute. I think they’re talented players, but you’re only as strong as your weakest link, which is clearly offensive tackle. They had to know in the offseason this was going to be a problem and yet it wasn’t addressed.

Austin Thomas makes 850k a year, and we hyped him up as this genius GM who’s supposed to build and manage rosters. But it feels out of sync and poorly managed, especially on the offensive side of the ball.

We spent 18 million on this team and can’t score more than 24 a game. I know coaching plays a part, but how do you have that much money and resources poured in and still can’t manage the offensive side of the roster to be somewhat functional?

It’s also frustrating seeing us lose top recruits in our class year after year and not being able to retain talented guys on our roster like CJ Daniels and Xavier Atkins from last year as an example.
Posted by burreauxsballz
Member since Jan 2022
1364 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:10 pm to
No, it isn’t. Thomas and the front office is one of the few parts of the organization that is functioning well.
Posted by mikesliveisacheater
Member since Nov 2009
1312 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

We spent 18 million on this team and can’t score more than 24 a game. I know coaching plays a part, but how do you have that much money and resources poured in and still can’t manage the offensive side of the roster to be somewhat functional?


Joe Sloan's disjointed scheme is more of the problem than the actual personnel. When you have that much talent and only score 24, it's the coaching.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75733 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Is it fair to criticize Austin Thomas for how this roster looks?


He's really good at fetching coffee.
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
4882 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:15 pm to
talent is there, i hate seeing him on the sideline.


Posted by friendlyobservation
Member since Mar 2024
3189 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:19 pm to
Austin Thomas has many rosters to prove he's not the problem. There's a reason he got poached off Ole Miss staff and has his own examples at LSU why this is not true. It's coaching. Plain and simple. BK is terrible between the headsets. Stop trying to scapegoat anyone you can when the problem is clear as day.

Be honest with yourself and go watch 4 years of BK football at LSU. He has got out coached an ungodly amount of times when you think about it. There's so many lucky wins while he was here and got completely dominated on the coaching side. If you remember just last year Ole Miss beat LSU in every facet of the game on the road except the final score. Just an example.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 12:21 pm
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
168155 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Austin Thomas makes 850k a year, and we hyped him up as this genius GM who’s supposed to build and manage rosters


Posted by Dicken Nuggets
Member since Aug 2019
593 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:19 pm to
The talent isn't the problem. LSU's roster is loaded. They have players that everyone else wants.

The coaching, particularly on the offensive side of the ball, is atrocious. BK, Sloan, and Brad Davis have absolutely committed a disservice to those young men.

The lack of development of the OL from Brad Davis is criminal, especially when you consider the talent he has to work with. He's coaching young men who were elite, national prospects that every blue-blood program in the country wanted to sign.
Posted by Tammany Tom
Mandeville
Member since Jun 2004
5249 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:21 pm to
I think you’d be shocked at how much better all the players you’re criticizing would look if properly coached.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 12:22 pm
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
26986 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

No, it isn’t. Thomas and the front office is one of the few parts of the organization that is functioning well.


And they are just getting started. One of the few things that would actually hurt if BK were canned, is not being able to see Thomas implement his vision.
Posted by bwats28
Member since Dec 2020
2 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:51 pm to
I don’t disagree with that, and you’re right about the coaching needing to be better. I probably should’ve worded my original post a little better. I’m not saying Austin Thomas is the main problem or trying to make him the scapegoat. I just think it’s fair to question why we didn’t address offensive tackle. He’s the guy in charge of building the roster, and they had to know that was going to be an issue going into the season. I just don’t get how, if you’re willing to spend almost 20 million on the roster, that’s not one of the first things you fix.
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
23888 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:53 pm to
Kelly made an account just to throw something against the wall to see if he could potentially blame Thomas.
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
2079 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:54 pm to
No, don't criticize the few functioning areas that actually work.

This staff has proven it is completely overrated and overpaid. This is a playoff roster good enough to make a run with a coaching staff that isn't mid at best.

Posted by gringeaux
DFW
Member since Oct 2008
1991 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:15 pm to
Would you rather Nic Anderson and Bauer Sharp or spent that NIL/Roster $ on a starting tackle?

Posted by friendlyobservation
Member since Mar 2024
3189 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:45 pm to
Goes back on BK, again. Personnel decisions are ultimately his. Thomas doesn't make the decisions. He's showing them who's the best at the portal and BK decides who he wants. He was comfortable with his OL and so he didn't think he needed more help. Again, that's on him. Scouting can only do that - put guys in front of you that they think will be big players for LSU. Sharp and Anderson are a disaster but I think guys like Brown are pressing hard and have shown flashes. I don't think any WR would be good in LSU's offense right now.

You're going to whiff on guys. Anderson seemed like a homerun at the time he was a 1000 yard all-sec freshman WR coming off an injury. I still think he actually might turn out good if they let him develop he's just clearly behind because it's a new system. How many defensive whiffs did they have? Gooden, Haulcey, Cooley, and Mansoor are all good/elite. Offense is BK's side of the ball. You put 2 and 2 together.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 2:49 pm
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
31682 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Austin Thomas makes 850k a year


Yeah lets instead blame the carpet bagging yankee making $10mm a year
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26237 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

The talent isn't the problem. LSU's roster is loaded.
would you say the o-line is loaded with talent?
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75733 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Yeah lets instead blame the carpet bagging yankee making $10mm a year


Blame isn't finite
Posted by friendlyobservation
Member since Mar 2024
3189 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:52 pm to
You think Thomas is the reason the OL is a problem? BK has already said it multiple times he liked the OL. You don't think this is what he wanted? He's still marching Weston Davis out there despite the guy behind him single-handedly being graded double - almost triple his highest PFF graded game with just as high of a ceiling.

Again, this is on BK. He said it even in the preseason how comfortable he was with the OL's development. He expected it but obviously, he didn't expect it this slow. Like everything else at LSU he has almost no foresight to fix a critical issue before it happens. This is the same guy who can't see Chester or Mubenga weren't SEC lineman last year, decided to revoke PCing duties from Sloan, and still somehow marches the same guy out there on a 20 million+ roster in a make or break season.

Thomas hasn't been here long enough for personnel problems to be on his shoulders.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 2:55 pm
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
13953 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Would you rather Nic Anderson and Bauer Sharp or spent that NIL/Roster $ on a starting tackle?



I don't believe that is the problem.
We had two starting tackles, first round draft choices, now playing in the NFL.
We couldn't push forward 6" if the game depended on it.

That indicates the strength Coach is not getting them ready for heavy lifting.

That is Kelly's man.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram