So, no kings means the dims don't want an authoritarian in office?

quote:

---

How does any of this make sense?

---

It's the modern American democratic party. They make no sense.

If we had a king would the government be shut down?

Liberal turned conservative playwright David Mamet famously said that modern liberals “pretend not to know things …. in the furtherance of their liberal agendas.”

All it means is no Trump. Liberals also actually do want a king - one who preaches safety overkill and zero risk (unless it’s sexual), woke thought and speech, being g h e y, and cucking to other races if they are Caucasian.

Plus, they are all unhappy and ugly people who need something to bish about.

By this time tomorrow, this forum will have multiple tweets of purple haired, bull ringed, hairy pitted freak lezbos screaming and crying.

Edited to not leave out the pube bearded soy boys on their leashes, standing around behind them .

Everything damn thin they falsely accuse Trump of doing they do themselves. Always

They think it is now or never(???)

DEMs don’t want their party to actually progress… to grow up.

quote:

---

no kings

---

But who was the nameless king giving all the autopen orders?

It’s always projection with Dems and the radical left.

mamdani.....supreme leader of idiots!

It’s not supposed to make sense. It’s bought and paid for and in lock step with MSM as a way to force another wedge between Americans.

And it’s working. I don’t consider any of these people protesting to be Americans, and that’s probably because many aren’t, but also because the progressive liberal is programmed to be opposed to actual democracy and is rooted in perpetual victimhood. They hate every American founding principle.