- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The 9/11 Files: Tucker Carlson
Posted on 10/14/25 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 10/14/25 at 4:39 pm
Anybody else watching this? Talk about a good blood boil. Episode 4 came out today. And much like Epstein; tower 7 did not kill itself.
16
Posted on 10/14/25 at 4:49 pm to olemc999
I've been watching and I don't believe nothing new has been revealed that has not been covered the last 24 years. However I'm happy Tucker is doing it because he is placing all the unanswered questions (that will probably never get answered), government failures, inconsistencies into one well told and formulated documentary.
Plus he is focusing on the real inconsistencies and not getting bogged down in crap theories like CGI.
Plus he is focusing on the real inconsistencies and not getting bogged down in crap theories like CGI.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 4:51 pm to GumboPot
I never knew that they moved the debris overseas. What’s the deal behind that?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:10 pm to olemc999
I didn't know that either. Also we all vaguely heard the terrorists were here taking flight lessons but never knew specifically John Brennan and the CIA did this.
Also: I never knew how much the Bush admin and Karl Rove blocked investigations.
I would like to know more on Cheney's order to shoot down all civilian planes.
Also: I never knew how much the Bush admin and Karl Rove blocked investigations.
I would like to know more on Cheney's order to shoot down all civilian planes.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:16 pm to olemc999
WTC 7 was structurally compromised when the North Tower fell into it, gashing it down the middle (likely caused by the antenna) and was otherwise engulfed in flames all day. You can find photos of all of this if you look. That it collapsed was hardly a surprise, at least to me. It was also totally evacuated when it fell, so if loss of lives was the objective of the attacks, any purported WTC 7 plot did not succeed. I love Tucker but some of this stuff is a stretch, and none of it is really new. I am glad he is making this doc, though, to make people think.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:22 pm to olemc999
The WTC Tower 7 was imploded. Larry Silverstein, the WTC real estate developer and property manager, even admitted in a TV interview that #7 was "Pulled" due to the damage caused by the collapse of the North Tower. Sen. John Kerry, when questioned, also admitted it was taken down. The cherry on the cake was the live BBC News report from NYC, claiming Tower 7 had collapsed. However, in the live shot with the reporter, Tower 7 is clearly seen still standing in the background. How can a news agency report a building has fallen 26 minutes before its actual collapse?
The destruction of that building was planned well in advance of the events on that day. To "Take Down" a building of that size would have required weeks of demolition preparation. This one event is the most obvious connection to a US Gov involvement in what happened on 9-11-01. CIA, DoD, Secret Service and Office of Emergency Mgt all with offices in Tower 7 the day it collapsed. Its demise was an attempt to slow the initial Federal response and investigation of what happened. There is no doubt in my mind and no other rational conclusion to explain what happened to Tower 7.
Silverstein Interview.
LINK
BBC Report
YouTube
CodeX 911 Documentary released this Sept.
YouTube
The destruction of that building was planned well in advance of the events on that day. To "Take Down" a building of that size would have required weeks of demolition preparation. This one event is the most obvious connection to a US Gov involvement in what happened on 9-11-01. CIA, DoD, Secret Service and Office of Emergency Mgt all with offices in Tower 7 the day it collapsed. Its demise was an attempt to slow the initial Federal response and investigation of what happened. There is no doubt in my mind and no other rational conclusion to explain what happened to Tower 7.
Silverstein Interview.
LINK
BBC Report
YouTube
CodeX 911 Documentary released this Sept.
YouTube
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:25 pm to olemc999
Hold on let get my tinfoil hat ready
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:35 pm to Tall Tiger
quote:
WTC 7 was structurally compromised when the North Tower fell into it, gashing it down the middle (likely caused by the antenna) and was otherwise engulfed in flames all day. You can find photos of all of this if you look. That it collapsed was hardly a surprise, at least to me. It was also totally evacuated when it fell, so if loss of lives was the objective of the attacks, any purported WTC 7 plot did not succeed. I love Tucker but some of this stuff is a stretch, and none of it is really new. I am glad he is making this doc, though, to make people think.
No it wasn’t lol. Building 7 wasn’t even next to the World Trade Center towers. All three buildings came straight down. Not only that, an antenna wouldn’t structurally damage another high rise.
Nothing in his series has been tin foil, he is just going through the facts. Most we know already so far.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:36 pm to olemc999
I hope Tucker gets into the Pentagon stuff. That's where things really get crazy.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:40 pm to olemc999
Pearl Harbor, Oct 6, 9/11, The USS Maine, (*Butler, PA.) All things that happened that led to war. Not saying that the governments did it themselves. Just that they ignored the signs in order to allow it to happen for their own purpose.
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:45 pm to NOBigEZ
If by "pulled" Silverstein meant the NYFD did not fight the fire in WTC 7 and allowed it to burn that afternoon, that was a correct statement and not surprising. The fire suppression system had lost its water supply and there was no one in the building to save because it was evacuated.
Tucker's newest video even concedes that in order to wire WTC 7 in advance, that would have been impossible to do without public detection because it would have required opening up walls and ceilings and cutting beams.
What keeps getting forgotten is that the fires did not take these buildings down alone, making the comparisons with other high rise fires inapplicable. The trade center buildings were already severely weakened by impact damage, and the fires were a compounding / contributing cause. In the case of WTC 7, it was damaged by the impact of the North Tower coming down upon it, gashing it down the middle. In the case of the North and South Towers, large portions of the internal structural cores and exterior load bearing walls were immediately obliterated by the impact of the two planes.
Tucker's newest video even concedes that in order to wire WTC 7 in advance, that would have been impossible to do without public detection because it would have required opening up walls and ceilings and cutting beams.
What keeps getting forgotten is that the fires did not take these buildings down alone, making the comparisons with other high rise fires inapplicable. The trade center buildings were already severely weakened by impact damage, and the fires were a compounding / contributing cause. In the case of WTC 7, it was damaged by the impact of the North Tower coming down upon it, gashing it down the middle. In the case of the North and South Towers, large portions of the internal structural cores and exterior load bearing walls were immediately obliterated by the impact of the two planes.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:54 pm to Tall Tiger
"Pulled" is a term used in the Demolition Industry to describe a deliberate collapse of a structure during demolition.
Thermal expansion from the fires could not have caused the beams to move off their seats because every beam in that building was held in place on its seat by two side plates.
Thermal expansion from the fires could not have caused the beams to move off their seats because every beam in that building was held in place on its seat by two side plates.
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:04 pm to GumboPot
Tower 7? That’s interesting, I’ll say that.
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:21 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
I hope Tucker gets into the Pentagon stuff. That's where things really get crazy.
Hopefully. Only one episode left.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:24 pm to Tall Tiger
quote:
WTC 7 was structurally compromised when the North Tower fell into it, gashing it down the middle (likely caused by the antenna) and was otherwise engulfed in flames all day. You can find photos of all of this if you look. That it collapsed was hardly a surprise, at least to me. It was also totally evacuated when it fell, so if loss of lives was the objective of the attacks, any purported WTC 7 plot did not succeed. I love Tucker but some of this stuff is a stretch, and none of it is really new. I am glad he is making this doc, though, to make people think.
PhD structural engineer from the University of Alaska disagrees with you.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:32 pm to olemc999
Posted on 10/14/25 at 6:37 pm to olemc999
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:26 pm to olemc999
Stahpp!!
This is WTC7 on fire as seen from Barctay St
This is the gash in WTC7 following the antennae from WTC1 ripping it open
>
This is 130 Liberty showing a simlar gap after WTC2 fell into it. However, 130 Liberty never caught fire.
Tucker needs clicks. Thats all
This is WTC7 on fire as seen from Barctay St
This is the gash in WTC7 following the antennae from WTC1 ripping it open
> This is 130 Liberty showing a simlar gap after WTC2 fell into it. However, 130 Liberty never caught fire.
Tucker needs clicks. Thats all
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:59 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I've been watching and I don't believe nothing new has been revealed that has not been covered the last 24 years. However I'm happy Tucker is doing it because he is placing all the unanswered questions (that will probably never get answered), government failures, inconsistencies into one well told and formulated documentary. Plus he is focusing on the real inconsistencies and not getting bogged down in crap theories like CGI.
The problem with conspiracies is the wrong info like tower 7 being demolished and it leads to people saying planes didn’t even crash into buildings.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 8:05 pm to olemc999
I think one of the biggest question regarding 9/11 is the lack of video evidence of an airliner hitting the Pentagon building.
I've searched YouTube a few times over the years for video of the jet hitting the Pentagon and I've yet to see a vid clip that shows a recognizable jet slamming into the Pentagon. There are surveillance cameras all over the Pentagon itself and on many of the buildings around the vicinity of the Pentagon and there isn't one fricking video of a jet coming into to view and hitting the Pentagon?
I've searched YouTube a few times over the years for video of the jet hitting the Pentagon and I've yet to see a vid clip that shows a recognizable jet slamming into the Pentagon. There are surveillance cameras all over the Pentagon itself and on many of the buildings around the vicinity of the Pentagon and there isn't one fricking video of a jet coming into to view and hitting the Pentagon?
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News