- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The internet has essentially split reality
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:39 pm
note to mods on placement in the OT: Posted this here instead of the poli board because it’s only tangentially about Trump, not about him directly, or any specific political event or policies. It’s meant to be a discussion about perception and how identical information can produce opposite interpretations. It might be too close to home with a lot of folks on the poli board to allow calm discussion of what I’m hoping to explore so I'd be grateful if you left it here.
This screenshot was posted in response to claims that the swamp isn’t being drained, and it highlights something deeper than irony. It shows how the same headlines can tell two entirely different stories depending on which world you live in.
To someone on one side, that thread list looks like progress: corruption exposed, the swamp drained, institutions finally being held accountable. To someone on the other, it looks like the opposite, a political figure using power to settle personal scores. This isn't an endorsement of either view and arguing for either one is irrelevant to the premise and not the purpose of this discussion.
Both groups are watching the same events, but their interpretations are filtered through separate media worlds. The fragmentation of information over the last few decades made these views self-reinforcing. The internet has effectively built parallel realities, with millions interpreting the same facts in mutually exclusive ways. It’s a study in perception.
And the cycle isn’t just self-sustaining anymore; it’s accelerating. Outrage drives clicks, clicks feed algorithms, and the machine keeps speeding up. Each side’s identity now depends on how much it hates the other. I’d like to think people will tire of it, but I doubt it. The divide isn’t merely political, it’s psychological. Every attempt to bridge it only deepens mistrust, because when you believe everyone who disagrees with you is evil, there’s no room left to see anything but malice in those who try to meet you halfway.
Curious what others think about this: is this divide still bridgeable, or are we already too deep into our separate realities? What would it take to rebuild even a basic level of shared trust, or does that idea sound naive at this point? Am I completely off base?
This screenshot was posted in response to claims that the swamp isn’t being drained, and it highlights something deeper than irony. It shows how the same headlines can tell two entirely different stories depending on which world you live in.
To someone on one side, that thread list looks like progress: corruption exposed, the swamp drained, institutions finally being held accountable. To someone on the other, it looks like the opposite, a political figure using power to settle personal scores. This isn't an endorsement of either view and arguing for either one is irrelevant to the premise and not the purpose of this discussion.
Both groups are watching the same events, but their interpretations are filtered through separate media worlds. The fragmentation of information over the last few decades made these views self-reinforcing. The internet has effectively built parallel realities, with millions interpreting the same facts in mutually exclusive ways. It’s a study in perception.
And the cycle isn’t just self-sustaining anymore; it’s accelerating. Outrage drives clicks, clicks feed algorithms, and the machine keeps speeding up. Each side’s identity now depends on how much it hates the other. I’d like to think people will tire of it, but I doubt it. The divide isn’t merely political, it’s psychological. Every attempt to bridge it only deepens mistrust, because when you believe everyone who disagrees with you is evil, there’s no room left to see anything but malice in those who try to meet you halfway.
Curious what others think about this: is this divide still bridgeable, or are we already too deep into our separate realities? What would it take to rebuild even a basic level of shared trust, or does that idea sound naive at this point? Am I completely off base?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:42 pm to northshorebamaman
Nice post. Agree with you. Social media only reinforces tribal politics.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:46 pm to northshorebamaman
It’s tough, because both sides want to argue about the ‘facts’, but nobody can agree on what the ‘facts’ actually are. We live in a world full of confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance, mostly with people on both sides who can’t identify when they are experiencing life through those prejudiced lenses.
Edit; most interesting to me is the effect evolutionary biology has on our perceptions of why we do things. Tribal politics have adaptive reasons, but unfortunately, the complicated nature of modern society allows these otherwise selective processes to be misapplied in modern discourse and behavior.
Edit; most interesting to me is the effect evolutionary biology has on our perceptions of why we do things. Tribal politics have adaptive reasons, but unfortunately, the complicated nature of modern society allows these otherwise selective processes to be misapplied in modern discourse and behavior.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:50 pm to northshorebamaman
The internet has commoditized divisiveness. They make more money when we are tribal and hate each other.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:51 pm to TigerReich
quote:Exactly. And I'm not fooling myself into believing I'm immune to it either. It's become increasingly difficult to find the "truth" about anything for everyone.
It’s tough, because both sides want to argue about the ‘facts’, but nobody can agree on what the ‘facts’ actually are. We live in a world full of confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance, mostly with people on both sides who can’t identify when they are experiencing life through those prejudiced lenses.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:56 pm to northshorebamaman
Too few take the time to objectively educate themselves and make informed decisions or evidence supported opinions. The wisdom to do so is typically isolated in the minority who resolve themselves to issues more immediately relevant to themselves, but unfortunately, it’s nothing new in human history.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 7:56 pm to northshorebamaman
OP discovers confirmation bias
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:02 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:Sure, but that’s kind of the entry-level observation. The point is how confirmation bias has become a multi-billion industry more akin to "bias weaponization."
OP discovers confirmation bias
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:06 pm to northshorebamaman
The internet gave every retard who would be LOL @ and silenced IRL the ability to go be retarded in an echo chamber and have other retards agree with them.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:10 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Exactly. And I'm not fooling myself into believing I'm immune to it either. It's become increasingly difficult to find the "truth" about anything for everyone.
Go read Matt Taibbis books. All of them. He talks a lot about the post fact era, and was doing it back before Obama ever left office. This has been building and building since 9/11.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:11 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
Go read Matt Taibbis books. All of them. He talks a lot about the post fact era, and was doing it back before Obama ever left office.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:21 pm to northshorebamaman
Can’t disagree tbh. I’ve largely tuned out of following most political happenings, other than major events that come up in everyday life. I’m likely more in the dark now, but also a bit happier. 
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:25 pm to northshorebamaman
Two things can be true at the same time. Donald and crew can be draining the parts of the swamp they want drained whilst at the same time he and his family/associates are grifting like hell to make every penny they possibly can off of their positions.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:27 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
It's become increasingly difficult to find the "truth" about anything for everyone.
The truth doesn't matter. All that matters is what you can convince enough people to believe.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:32 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:They can but that's not the intended subject of the thread, nor is Trump. As I said before, the screenshot is only intended to demonstrate the phenomenon I described, not to discuss the specific topics listed.
Two things can be true at the same time. Donald and crew can be draining the parts of the swamp they want drained whilst at the same time he and his family/associates are grifting like hell to make every penny they possibly can off of their positions.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:33 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:The post isn’t about Trump or defending either side. It’s about perception. The same events look like justice or corruption depending on which media ecosystem you live in. Each side’s proof of integrity has become the other’s proof of guilt. The internet turned confirmation bias into parallel realities where people interpret identical facts in completely opposite ways. Outrage keeps the system running, algorithms reward division, and identity now depends on how much each side hates the other. The result isn’t just political polarization anymore but psychological separation that makes genuine communication almost impossible.
Cliff’s?
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:39 pm to northshorebamaman
AI is only going to make this worse and speed things up.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:42 pm to northshorebamaman
As someone who has been accused of being a political board regular, y’all worry about the political board way too much
I will say the introduction of that board seemed to immediately raise the average age of the board by 15 years
I will say the introduction of that board seemed to immediately raise the average age of the board by 15 years
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:43 pm to Sun God
quote:
As someone who has been accused of being a political board regular, y’all worry about the political board way too much I will say the introduction of that board seemingly immediately raised the average age of the board by 15 years
The Politard board is a black eye on human civilization.
Popular
Back to top


33







