- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tip of the day: Let Grok look over any legal forms before signing
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:20 pm
11
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:22 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
the who thing
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:25 pm to hawgfaninc
Important to feed a lot of your personal details to AI
No way that could go bad for you in the future.
No way that could go bad for you in the future.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:27 pm to hawgfaninc
Better Call Saul
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:27 pm to hawgfaninc
Sure. And then deal with the chaos and confusion for all the things it gets wrong....
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:28 pm to hawgfaninc
Wonder how soon AI will replace paralegals.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 6:28 pm to hawgfaninc
I had a moment to today. I had prepared some information about international cybersecurity regulations and sent it to marketing. They asked me to make it sound less AI (which to them means dry and not salesy.) It sucked because I actually prepared it myself this time.
Can anyone guess what I did to get a thumbs up?
Can anyone guess what I did to get a thumbs up?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:28 pm to shutterspeed
I thought it already was?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:30 pm to hawgfaninc
How would ChatGPT do with legal docs vs grok.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:34 pm to hawgfaninc
You bring a lot of useless shite from Twitter to here
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:36 pm to hawgfaninc
Hate to tell you but courts are sanctioning attorneys for relying on AI in their pleadings that ended up being completely wrong.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:40 pm to hawgfaninc
I think OP is saying just have it do a last check for things worth looking further into instead of relying on it 100% you damn retards
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:43 pm to dstone12
Much better IMO grok is wrong all the time because it uses random info from reddit and twitter in addition to normal sources
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:48 pm to TigerMan327
If you aren't using at least 2 to check each other, you're risking error even with your own QA. I messed with these a lot before using them for any sort of production. Paid versions are mostly legit, but they still make errors.
AI prompting will be a college course very soon.
AI prompting will be a college course very soon.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 7:49 pm to hawgfaninc
if you do this you are completely retarded
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:37 pm to dstone12
I’ve had GPT look over legal documents for the past couple of years for small stuff that doesn’t really doesn’t require an attorney, more or less confirms or fives feedback on my take on it. It does fine until it literally hallucinates and starts making shite up to sound right. It can be incredibly wrong and give totally made up answers that sound good. Totally unreliable. For me at least, it’s gotten really bad.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:42 pm to Nephropidae
quote:
gotten really bad.
The problem with AI is that it learns from the information it has available. Which is being introduced to the internet by idiots. So eventually AI will be a dumbass too, well certain forms of it. AI for engineering and IT where you're giving it all the parameters is very useful.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:44 pm to Nephropidae
At some point, though, AI will have an encyclopedic knowledge of every law, every case, every appeal, every outcome for every state, district, municipal and federal decision. It will still need to be double checked, but the more and more it gets refined the more close it becomes to being able to offer solid legal advice.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:29 pm to HubbaBubba
I understand that. And for now, even with the updated versions, (possibly due to other inputs in its reasoning), it’s literally resorted to making shite up to sound good. Doesn’t even follow ordinary prompts. Not every time. Still get good responses… but once in a while it will complete ignore every input and file you have provided, and just make stuff up to sound good. It’s completely unreliable.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:45 pm to TigerMan327
quote:
Much better IMO grok is wrong all the time because it uses random info from reddit and twitter in addition to normal sources
Ummmm they both use the same sources with different weighting. Most of their sources are slanted and then they create stuff out of thin air when dumbfounded
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News