- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Solid take on how to discipline judges - house majority to impeach
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:28 am
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:28 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. There is a misunderstanding when it comes to impeachment of judges. You only need a simple majority in the house to impeach any judge.
Once impeached, it goes to the senate where you need 67 votes to remove them.
In other words, the House can impeach every one of these leftist loons tomorrow of they wanted to.
By doing so, these judges will have to defend their ruling before the senate and the people. Granted most won't be removed, but the process will be its own punishment, and it will stop most of these crazy rulings.
Get these corrupt senators on record.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 11:30 am
14
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:31 am to prplngldtigr
quote:
Get these corrupt senators on record.
They are on record... nothing changes.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:32 am to SallysHuman
Sadly, you are not wrong.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:32 am to prplngldtigr
Something something shine light, scatter roaches.
If our politicians had any backbone they would have done this a while ago.
If our politicians had any backbone they would have done this a while ago.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:33 am to SallysHuman
They have to spend money on legal fees. Democrats love using this technique on their enemies.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:35 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
They have to spend money on legal fees. Democrats love using this technique on their enemies.
They'll crowdfund... this shite is intractable.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:43 am to prplngldtigr
quote:
Get these corrupt senators on record
Name even 5 dem Senators that would vote to impeach a prog judge?
Pocahontas
Sanders
Blumenthal
Booker
Schiff
Schumer
They dont care about honest and the voters will never hold them accountable.
I bet a few RINOs woukd never as well due to weakness.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:49 am to prplngldtigr
Yes, because the politicization of the impeachment process is a good thing!
It was garbage when they did it to Trump. It will be garbage if they do it to judges.
And it had no effect on Trump. He was emboldened and empowered afterward.
And it will have no effect on these judges. If anything it will backfire.
But I guess it will look good on social media.
It was garbage when they did it to Trump. It will be garbage if they do it to judges.
And it had no effect on Trump. He was emboldened and empowered afterward.
And it will have no effect on these judges. If anything it will backfire.
But I guess it will look good on social media.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:53 am to prplngldtigr
I really like this idea, republicans don’t have the sack to do it though
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:39 pm to prplngldtigr
The senate cannot act on a house impeachment until the GD House votes to impeach these clearly biased, political, and in some cases incompetent judges.
Mike Johnson, WTF are you waiting for?
And oh by the way Michael, how about teeing up legislation to codify Trump’s numerous executive orders? Unless of course you are part of the team and plan to want to see all that Trump is doing to go away like a fart in the wind after Trump is gone.
Mike Johnson, WTF are you waiting for?
And oh by the way Michael, how about teeing up legislation to codify Trump’s numerous executive orders? Unless of course you are part of the team and plan to want to see all that Trump is doing to go away like a fart in the wind after Trump is gone.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:42 pm to prplngldtigr
Waste of time. No judge will be removed and they know it.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:44 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
There is a misunderstanding when it comes to impeachment of judges. You only need a simple majority in the house to impeach any judge.
Once impeached, it goes to the senate where you need 67 votes to remove them.
In other words, the House can impeach every one of these leftist loons tomorrow of they wanted to.
By doing so, these judges will have to defend their ruling before the senate and the people. Granted most won't be removed, but the process will be its own punishment, and it will stop most of these crazy rulings.
Get these corrupt senators on record.
While they are testifying in the Senate, they are temporarily out of commission.
Make them squirm and justify their rulings.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:48 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
these judges will have to defend their ruling before the senate and the people
They defend their rulings in the public record already, dipshit. Quit your whining.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:03 pm to prplngldtigr
It is an interesting question as to whether U.S. District Court and Circuit Court judges are "civil officers" subject to the Constitutional requirements of impeachment.
Historical practice says they are. But impeachment seems logically to be a limitation on Executive Power and maybe the Supreme Court. But district and circuit court judges were created by Congress. Seems plausible that a simple majority would suffice for removal if Congress desired.
Historical practice says they are. But impeachment seems logically to be a limitation on Executive Power and maybe the Supreme Court. But district and circuit court judges were created by Congress. Seems plausible that a simple majority would suffice for removal if Congress desired.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:07 pm to prplngldtigr
I believe a judge will be brought in before congress no idea who but they are on a very slippery slope here
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:27 pm to prplngldtigr
Because as soon as the Dems get majority they will do the same. Trump appointees in the long run will out number the Lib judges
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:53 pm to BHTiger
quote:
Name even 5 dem Senators that would vote to impeach a prog judge?
Pocahontas
Sanders
Blumenthal
Booker
Schiff
Schumer
Well, none of them would vote to impeach because the Senate doesn't impeach.
This board continues to mix up the two.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:04 pm to prplngldtigr
Once the House files the impeachment charge, is the Judge removed from thee bench until after the Senate adjudicates?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:39 pm to prplngldtigr
Here it is. The Senate needs to return to the states.
Its the only way to hold them accountable.
It was designed that way for a reason.
Local people elect state reps and senators. Thus they are more accountable. In turn, the legislative branch appoints the senators to go and represent the state gov at a federal level.
By removing that, we the people were screwed
Why? Because the smaller districts can not over come a large city. But in the legislature the smaller areas have a stronger voice.
Its the only way to hold them accountable.
It was designed that way for a reason.
Local people elect state reps and senators. Thus they are more accountable. In turn, the legislative branch appoints the senators to go and represent the state gov at a federal level.
By removing that, we the people were screwed
Why? Because the smaller districts can not over come a large city. But in the legislature the smaller areas have a stronger voice.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 4:40 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News