- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump has officially petitioned the SCOTUS to allow him to END birthright citizenship
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:18 am
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:18 am
23
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:50 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:58 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Good move by the Don.
6-3 incoming. Well with Roberts it may be 5-4.
6-3 incoming. Well with Roberts it may be 5-4.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:00 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I fricking voted for this
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:14 am to hogcard1964
quote:
6-3 incoming. Well with Roberts it may be 5-4.
Can't wait to read the dissent from Justice Wise Latina and Justice DEI.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:15 am to TygerTyger
This will be so fricking huge if this happens.
I get irrationally mad when I hear an illegal popping out a kid that’s now a “citizen” and gets full benefits of the US.
We cannot do that anywhere else in the world.
I get irrationally mad when I hear an illegal popping out a kid that’s now a “citizen” and gets full benefits of the US.
We cannot do that anywhere else in the world.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:18 am to TygerTyger
quote:Extremely
How stupid are you?
It’s an alter too
This post was edited on 9/27/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:19 am to Passing Wind
quote:
we all agree. You are
Uh, no.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:20 am to dalefla
quote:
The key term being here "legally". Our founders were a moral group with little foresight of how immoral many Americans and people in general would become.
What do our founders have to do with the 14th Amendment?
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Trump is 100% correct. Anyone who disagrees is a fricking retard.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:35 am to the808bass
quote:
Trump is 100% correct. Anyone who disagrees is a fricking retard.
Sneak across the line and shite out a US citizen!
Sounds exactly like what the founders, who only allowed white male property owners to vote, would implement.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:36 am to Robin Masters
Exactly.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:36 am to the808bass
quote:
Anyone who disagrees is a fricking retard.
Look up
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:36 am to SlowFlowPro
Without the Constitution there is no 14th amendment you moron.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:46 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Sounds exactly like what the founders, who only allowed white male property owners to vote, would implement.
What do the founders have to do with anything in this discussion?
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:48 am to dalefla
quote:
Without the Constitution there is no 14th amendment you moron.
A cope the level of which we have never seen before
The founders crafted the Constitution with the ability to amend it, which makes their opinions pre-Amendment worthless on the matter.
Bringing up the founders is an argument for emotional, non-intelligent/logical types. Hence why I called the X poster a retard.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Are you asserting the founding documents and ideas of the country are irrelevant to this question?
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:51 am to 14&Counting
quote:
Can't wait to read the dissent from Justice Wise Latina and Justice DEI.
Hell, those two probably think borders are unconstitutional.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:53 am to the808bass
quote:
Are you asserting the founding documents and ideas of the country are irrelevant to this question?
When the sole discussion is the 14th Amendment? Yes.
Well, technically, the 14th is a part of the founding documents (as an amendment, it's still considered part of the whole), so if that's your gotcha attempt, I see it.
The 14A controlling the issue means whatever conflict(s) existing in the versions of the Constitution pre-14A (which I don't believe there are any as BRC wasn't referenced, as it couldn't jive with the legal slavery at the time) lost any relevance or authority once the 14A was passed, as it supersedes any such conflict entirely.
That's the point of the Amendment process.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
The intent behind that section of the 14th was to address the rights of freed slaves and the children of slaves to become US citizens. The country wasn’t facing a massive illegal immigration crisis during the reconstruction period when this was voted on.
This should be addressed by the Supreme Court
This should be addressed by the Supreme Court
Page 1 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News