Did Charlie Kirk really say anything that bad or untrue?

That truth to a Democrat is like salt to a slug.

I didn't read or listen to enough of Charlie Kirk to have an opinion about what he said. All I can say is that no one, no matter what side of the aisle, deserves to be assassinated for their political beliefs just because you disagree with them. He seemed like a really good, God-fearing, family man.

quote:

---

Did Charlie Kirk really say anything that bad or untrue?

---

He was taken out of context, or edited, to prove a leftist talking point. It's really twisted how easily people fall for that crap.

The only things Kirk said that I disagreed with was his stance on abortion where he said his 8you would have a baby if raped. That's a tad extreme, IMHO. But it is his opinion, and that's OK. The other issue I disagree with is his stance on tariffs. I simply disagree. Everything else he talked about was right on.

Wait until MIlo returns.

The only one that "looks bad" is him blowing up at a wanna be journalist who's name is Cenk Uygur. The clip is Charlie blowing up after Cenk keeps poking at him from off camera during an on-stage discussion with two others.

The left claims he's lashing out at an oriental person calling them and "chink". Reality is he's lashing out Cenk.

They also take the "black pilots" comment completely out of context. In the clip, he's discussing a major airline CEO saying their primary focus for hiring pilots going forward is going to be diversity. Charlie, in so many words, is saying he doesn't want to worry that if he sees a black pilot in the cockpit that the person was a DEI hire and not the most qualified pilot available.

The left wanted him dead because he was so effective in getting people to vote against them. If Charlie said the exact same things he did over the last 2 years but Kamala Harris was our President right now, he would be alive.

quote:

---

Will he did have a few controversial opinions.
The comment that black women steal jobs because they can't think or something along those lines.
The comment about black airline pilots might not be qualified.
or "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s".
I can see people considering those to be raciest like comments.

---

Only a mental midget that took MSMs 20 second sound blurb would think that….and I guess that would be you.

quote:

---

The few clips i've seen are him stating facts in a calm and respectful manner. The only controversial stance ive heard from him was that trans people are mentally ill, which most people agree with anyway. Not sure why he is getting reported as a racist, propaganda nazi. Am i missing something?

---

The Charlie you've seen is what we've known. 99%+

It won't matter.

To the progressive, they will seize on the one or two 'questionable' or 'titillating' moments in his very, public life. Because no one is perfect, they will promote these, until the end of time.

Remember, since the devastating event first occurred, more effort has been directed [world-wide] to 'digging up dirt on Charlie Kirk' than was probably put into the vice-presidential candidate research for Kamala.

They have nothing... nothing but useful idiots who continue to out themselves, committing Seppuku for their cause.

What they are left with is almost insignificant.

For instance, Wikipedia (who I have a love/hate relationship with) -- love the technical, crowdsourced writing / Hate the liberal bias in anything remotely political) stated something to the effect of:

"Charlie Kirk supported funding to raise bail for Paul Pelosi's attacker, who he called - a true patriot"

Really, I don't remember it but perhaps he did. The left LOVE to keep references like this alive.

quote:

---

Will he did have a few controversial opinions.
The comment that black women steal jobs because they can't think or something along those lines.
The comment about black airline pilots might not be qualified.
or "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s".
I can see people considering those to be raciest like comments.


I can tell by the accuracy "or something along those lines" in your posts that you are clearly well-versed in his statements and not at all taking them out of context

---

One of the problems is that the msm makes it tough to find context. They selectively edit out explanations and focus on statements that are provocative. With the Civil Rights Act, I could not find the context, only the original statement of the "huge mistake" along with interpretations of him believing it became a tool for DEI and racism in a broader sense. Anyone have a link to him adding context to this statement? Obviously a guy who hosts a black leadership conference and provides scholarships to blacks to get there does not believe that blacks should not have equal rights, but I would like to see the video with the context behind his statement. I found one with a female asking him about his statement, but it was a gotcha statement on YouTube where they cut him off on a short after he affirmed what he said.

quote:

---

I can tell by the accuracy "or something along those lines" in your posts that you are clearly well-versed in his statements and not at all taking them out of context

---

I'm as well-versed on Charlie Kirk as I care to be, never hated the guy but didn't care enough to make his opinions my guiding light in life.