- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Acreboy alter is now posting on the Poliboard defending raping underage girls
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:03 pm
Just wanted to link this poster called rocksteady who registered on 9/11 2013 about two years after Acreboy was caught trying to have sex with a 15 year old girl, and here was rocksteady’s response to Donald Trump apparently defending people who rape 16 year olds: TD
And here’s another gold one from him that only a pedophile would say: TD
That’s got to be the most morally disgusting post in the history of this site. Literally defending raping teenagers as if it’s no big deal. Now maybe it’s Acreboy and maybe it’s not, but the fact is this person is almost certainly molesting and/or sexting with underage kids. The FBI should be watching him, but then again they’re defending dozens of other influential and powerful pedophiles.
quote:
Here what comes you fricking idiot? Facts? fricking 16 year olds is the same as fricking prepubescent children to you ?
You keep incorrectly using the word pedo and running around like a village idiot with a pitch fork. Your perspective is 100% wrong, so yeah, here comes proper perspective, for starters
Your OP was “prove me wrong” - you’ve been wrong and running around shrieking like a dumb fagot this entire time
And here’s another gold one from him that only a pedophile would say: TD
quote:
Men frick sexually mature young women, it’s quite possibly the oldest tale of all time.
That’s got to be the most morally disgusting post in the history of this site. Literally defending raping teenagers as if it’s no big deal. Now maybe it’s Acreboy and maybe it’s not, but the fact is this person is almost certainly molesting and/or sexting with underage kids. The FBI should be watching him, but then again they’re defending dozens of other influential and powerful pedophiles.
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 9:09 pm
16
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:09 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
That’s got to be the most morally disgusting post in the history of this site
Are you new here?
I didn’t read the whole thread, so maybe I missed the context, but it appears he was arguing over definitions of “pedo”
Which is a bit tone deaf, but not incorrect.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:10 pm to OMLandshark
Alright lets all log out for the night
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:11 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Just wanted to link this poster called rocksteady who registered on 9/11 2013
First mooslims flew 767s into the world trade center and now this
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:11 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
I didn’t read the whole thread, so maybe I missed the context, but it appears he was arguing over definitions of “pedo”
Would anyone who is not a pedo defend that? Would anyone who is not a pedo say the following sentence?
quote:
Men frick sexually mature young women, it’s quite possibly the oldest tale of all time.
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:11 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
That’s got to be the most morally disgusting post in the history of this site.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:12 pm to OMLandshark
He's going to creampie mmmmmmmmmmmmbeer's daughter right when Planned Parenthood everywhere is closing down
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:13 pm to stout
quote:
He's going to creampie mmmmmmmmmmmmbeer's daughter right when Planned Parenthood everywhere is closing down
Only post coming to mind that is equally as morally disgusting.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:15 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Would anyone who is not a pedo defend that?
I didn’t see him defend anything. I saw a “but akshually” which is dumb, but not disgusting.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:16 pm to OMLandshark
You strike me as someone who usually tends to care about actual definitions of things. I candidly don't care if a morally bankrupt perv/dirtbag is conflated with a pedophile in society/on the internet, but they're not the same thing and they present very different threats.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:18 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
You strike me as someone who usually tends to care about actual definitions of things. I candidly don't care if a morally bankrupt perv/dirtbag is conflated with a pedophile in society/on the internet, but they're not the same thing and they present very different threats
There are semantics people care about that reveals something about them.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:20 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Acreboy
Damn he's still out there statutory rapin'?
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:21 pm to stout
Who was the poster that photoshopped jizz all over the face of someone’s daughter years and years ago?
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:24 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
There are semantics people care about that reveals something about them.
I don’t personally care to differentiate between the two, because it’s not important to me. But there is a substantial difference.
Some people just like correct language.
And your histrionics on the topic say something about you.
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:24 pm to OMLandshark
Maybe in a "doth protest too much" kind of way
But look, if you're a dad of a 16 year old girl and a 7 year old girl the predators you're concerned with are wildly different. You can be equally concerned but still realize that. I imagine anyone who hunts or prosecutes such people for a living would say the same.
And this has actually been a thing in the Epstein/Trump saga when we talk about why the evidence may be a major challenge for the DOJ in determining whether videos, etc. constitute criminal activity.
But look, if you're a dad of a 16 year old girl and a 7 year old girl the predators you're concerned with are wildly different. You can be equally concerned but still realize that. I imagine anyone who hunts or prosecutes such people for a living would say the same.
And this has actually been a thing in the Epstein/Trump saga when we talk about why the evidence may be a major challenge for the DOJ in determining whether videos, etc. constitute criminal activity.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:28 pm to OMLandshark
you need to google the terms pedophile, hebephile, and ephebophile...each word refers to a very specific type of offender, and gives the age ranges of the children they prey upon...
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:31 pm to OMLandshark
OML is drunk even for OML
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:32 pm to pussywillows
quote:
you need to google the terms pedophile, hebephile, and ephebophile...each word refers to a very specific type of offender, and gives the age ranges of the children they prey upon...
I’m not getting into those fricked up semantics. Since the age of 17 I have not been attracted to a 15 year old and from the age of 19 haven’t been attracted to a 16 year old. My boner tends to mostly live by the equation half your age plus seven, although I’m getting a little older now and am beyond qualifying for a 22 year old where I actually start to find women attractive these days.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:33 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
There are semantics people care about that reveals something about them.
There is a lot of irony in this post
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:33 pm to hg
quote:
Who was the poster that photoshopped jizz all over the face of someone’s daughter years and years ago?
Was that just me?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News