- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

NCAA and timing (now vs pre-camp
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:12 pm
If this had been a ruling the NCAA made prior to camp, then the coaches could develop the defense with the knowledge that someone else would need to get the first reps in game one.
Having to shift your depth chart and potentially modifying your game plan for a missing starter literally 48 hours until kickoff is damaging, even if only in a small way
Don't think for one second the timing of this wasn't calculated. Someone had been sitting on that information for quite a while waiting to disseminate it at the right time. Due to the timing, the suspension should have been pushed until next week as to not have a disruption to a team that didn't even participate in a fight 7 months ago in another conference. But their incompetence is always on constant display so no one should be surprised
Having to shift your depth chart and potentially modifying your game plan for a missing starter literally 48 hours until kickoff is damaging, even if only in a small way
Don't think for one second the timing of this wasn't calculated. Someone had been sitting on that information for quite a while waiting to disseminate it at the right time. Due to the timing, the suspension should have been pushed until next week as to not have a disruption to a team that didn't even participate in a fight 7 months ago in another conference. But their incompetence is always on constant display so no one should be surprised
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:13 pm to Shaq4prez
Why didn’t LSU enquirer months ago? Only people to blame are inside the LSU football ops building.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:14 pm to LSUfonte
quote:
Why didn’t LSU enquirer months ago?
Valid
quote:
Only people to blame are inside the LSU football ops building.
Not the only, but yes they share blame
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:15 pm to Shaq4prez
quote:
Don't think for one second the timing of this wasn't calculated. Someone had been sitting on that information for quite a while waiting to disseminate it at the right time
It wasn’t a foregone conclusion that Clemson would get this ruling in their favor. The suspension was officially recorded as an unsportsmanlike penalty, which doesn’t have a carry-over suspension. The NCAA tripped over themselves, which is the only thing they’re good at.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:16 pm to misey94
Is it just me or are we always catching the brunt of some bizarre NCAA ruling that ultimately fricks us over?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:18 pm to LSUfonte
quote:
Why didn’t LSU enquirer months ago? Only people to blame are inside the LSU football ops building.
Why would LSU draw attention to something like that? Even if they knew about it the whole time, it changes nothing now.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:19 pm to LSUfonte
quote:
Why didn’t LSU enquirer months ago?
Perhaps but would it have been public record that a ruling was changed after a game in another conference? It's the Ncaa's responsibility to communicate penalties. The NCAA should have communicated this. It's not like this ruling was changed after fourth quarter of the Texas bowl
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:19 pm to LSUfonte
quote:Houston was given word that the penalty was upgraded post game.
Why didn’t LSU enquirer months ago? Only people to blame are inside the LSU football ops building.
If they didn't share that information with LSU, how is LSU supposed to know?
Why would LSU inquire if they were unaware of a highly unusual ruling?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:20 pm to Shaq4prez
quote:
Having shift your depth chart and potentially modifying your game plan for a missing starter literally 48 hours until kickoff is damaging
Every team is prepared for this because they all have to factor in that an injury can happen at any time.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:20 pm to Shaq4prez
That is on US—LSU. You have to be PROACTIVE when it comes to shite like this, not REACTIVE. I’m not sure whose purview it falls under, but this is on LSU, not Clemson, not the NCAA, not the BIG 12. LSU’s. We had the most to lose. We had the ONLY thing to lose. We should have fricking gotten ahead of it.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:22 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Not the only, but yes they share blame
Nah, they are the ONLY. We are the ONLY ones with anything to lose. On us. 100%.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:22 pm to Shaq4prez
quote:
The NCAA should have communicated this. It's not like this ruling was changed after fourth quarter of the Texas bowl
Yeah this seems like something the NCAA should do. The big 12 told Houston. The NCAA is supposed to approve and clear transfers right? Shouldn't they say "hey this guy is suspended"?
They do frick all else, seems like they could do this one.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:23 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
Nah, they are the ONLY. We are the ONLY ones with anything to lose. On us. 100%.
Why should LSU ask if a player at a different school has a penalty that'll carry over? He got ejected. How often do those penalties get changed after a game?
This is the kind of shite the NCAA should be doing
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:24 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
That is on US—LSU. You have to be PROACTIVE when it comes to shite like this, not REACTIVE. I’m not sure whose purview it falls under, but this is on LSU, not Clemson, not the NCAA, not the BIG 12. LSU’s. We had the most to lose. We had the ONLY thing to lose. We should have fricking gotten ahead of it.
What would that have changed? If a rule is broken, and nobody says a peep, you don’t go running around making sure everyone knows about it.
It’s a defensive back position where they’ve been rotating guys all camp who is out for one half of football. It’ll be ok.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:26 pm to Hot Carl
Agreed. Someone on our staff should be involved in this crap so we’re not blindsided. Players are being paid to play and the sport is constantly changing. We have to be on top of this.
I hope we use this to beat Clemsons arse.
I hope we use this to beat Clemsons arse.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:28 pm to Shaq4prez
Absolutely not. Sue the NCAA and play his arse. No appeal is necessary. frick the NCAA
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:29 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
Why should LSU ask if a player at a different school has a penalty that'll carry over? He got ejected. How often do those penalties get changed after a game?
Why should they? To prevent this from happening you dumb motherfricker.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:30 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
Why should they? To prevent this from happening you dumb motherfricker.
"Hey this guy got penalized and it carried no suspension. Did y'all happen to change that?"
Do you realize how fricking stupid that sounds?
Hell the NCAA CLEARED HIS TRANSFER. If he had a suspension shouldn't that be something they'd flag then?
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:32 pm to misey94
Year by year, the game is destroyed by these clowns.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 6:33 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
Why should they? To prevent this from happening you dumb motherfricker.
Prevent what from happening? You know for a fact lsu didn’t already know this was a possibility?
And let’s say for arguments sake they were blindsided by this news…are you suggesting that all preseason camp they should have not let the best safety take the number 1 reps because of a potential half of football he might miss? Seriously?
Popular
Back to top


6








