- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
RAS Scores
Posted on 8/28/25 at 11:03 am
Posted on 8/28/25 at 11:03 am
It seems our solid drafting has declined with the staff's reliance on RAS scores. Guys like Turner, Foskey and Penning were high RAS guys.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 11:22 am to saints5021
quote:
RAS guys.
If you were dating, and there was a RAS score for that "Potential mate"
Would it prove successful as well ?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 11:37 am to saints5021
There is a strong correlation to the high RAS scores and being a top performer in the league. And really, the draft is full of high RAS guys. I think the player evaluation portion of the scouting is what is really lacking
Posted on 8/28/25 at 11:57 am to GynoSandberg
Yeah it's the complete package of the evaluation that we are lacking on.
While RAS is great, it's only one part. Same with accolades such as awards and captaincy, as well as personality. We put HEAVY reliance on those 3 things, and often overlook production (but not always), competition level (far too often), level of surrounding teammates (far too often), and what is actually seen on tape (far too often).
You need to look at all of these things as a whole to get a complete picture. While RAS is great at determining if someone is athletic enough for the nfl, it doesn't tell you if they have the head for it, nor the technique. And just because someone has a great personality doesn't mean they will be a great player, and vice versa with some guys that may not be the best of character but are still great players (but there is a limit to how bad of a character you allow).
I feel like watching tape/technique is by far the biggest thing we miss on players, as it seems most of the ones that bust are raw prospects with great RAS and personality.
While RAS is great, it's only one part. Same with accolades such as awards and captaincy, as well as personality. We put HEAVY reliance on those 3 things, and often overlook production (but not always), competition level (far too often), level of surrounding teammates (far too often), and what is actually seen on tape (far too often).
You need to look at all of these things as a whole to get a complete picture. While RAS is great at determining if someone is athletic enough for the nfl, it doesn't tell you if they have the head for it, nor the technique. And just because someone has a great personality doesn't mean they will be a great player, and vice versa with some guys that may not be the best of character but are still great players (but there is a limit to how bad of a character you allow).
I feel like watching tape/technique is by far the biggest thing we miss on players, as it seems most of the ones that bust are raw prospects with great RAS and personality.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 12:14 pm to saints5021
You have to be able to identify "it".
Do they have it or not!
Do they have it or not!
Posted on 8/28/25 at 12:17 pm to saints5021
How many of you guys actually know what scouts do?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 12:20 pm to saints5021
It's when you can find the RAS players that are also intelligent. That's when you have something. I think Stutsman will be that for us. Isaac Teslaa for the Lions will be one to watch also.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 12:25 pm to saints5021
Don't take RAS guys from very small schools as much.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 12:54 pm to goatmilker
It seems after the 2017 Draft, the Saints became obsessed with RAS and prototype positional build. Perhaps that was the winning factor over traditional scouting, but no one can deny that we have had a huge bust rate with the high RAS players.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 1:03 pm to saints5021
quote:
but no one can deny that we have had a huge bust rate with the high RAS players.
Serious question, but can it be proven that the huge bust rate was due to high RAS scores; or is that simply part of the equation.
If they only drafted high RAS scores, then you could make a quick comparison of the hit/miss to see how those players drafted by the Saints did. However, you would also need to expand the population to see if other players with high RAS scored were more likely to bust than hit.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 1:10 pm to Snipe
quote:
How many of you guys actually know what scouts do?
If it’s our scouts, not much is the answer…
Posted on 8/28/25 at 1:13 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Dude, I am just a fan. All I know is that we have had a huge number of high draft picks that have not developed since this board started talking about it.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 1:54 pm to saints5021
quote:
It seems our solid drafting has declined with the staff's reliance on RAS scores. Guys like Turner, Foskey and Penning were high RAS guys.
Turns out that knowledge of the game and a deeper analysis of the play of the player is more important than numbers related to pure athleticism.
Imagine that.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 1:58 pm to saints5021
quote:
It seems after the 2017 Draft, the Saints became obsessed with RAS and prototype positional build
I do think it started that year too. One issue is guys like Davenport and Turner had high RAS but not standout production. Penning & Saldiveri were small school RAS guys. Ruiz was a RAS guy who was seemingly drafted off that without a specific position in mind
In the same breath, guys like Hendrickson, Kaden Ellis, Werner, Adebo were high RAS gems.
You have guys like AK, Ceedy Duce, Marcus Williams, Anzalone, Baun who weren’t RAS beast either. So in reality I think it’s been a bit of a mixed bag
Posted on 8/28/25 at 2:07 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:Notice when most of these were drafted. There was definitely a shift HARD into RAS shortly after (and by that I mean the next year on). It's not every player, but it's clear it is overvalued.
You have guys like AK, Ceedy Duce, Marcus Williams, Anzalone, Baun who weren’t RAS beast either. So in reality I think it’s been a bit of a mixed bag
I wonder how many "average" RAS players like those we passed on for small school or raw RAS standouts?
Tbh, I wonder if hitting on Hendrickson is to blame for that. Seems like we used it on him and hit gold, but then thought it would keep happening.
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 2:31 pm to bonethug0180
RAS wasn’t introduced until 2013, didn’t really hit mainstream for awhile. I think Onyemata was the first we heard of RAS linked to our draft picks. It would make sense leading into 2017
Posted on 8/28/25 at 2:42 pm to GynoSandberg
Ah yeah so maybe both us and GB started using it in 2016, since we both were keyed in on him, it worked, we did it with Trey 2017, it worked again, so we figured we were getting ahead of the game and leaned a bit too far into it.
Tbf Davenport, when healthy, also was another success case using it, but the injuries just derailed him so badly.
I think there is enough proof in the opposite direction that they should start to realize that they should lessen the weighting on it now, but still pay attention to it. Don't forget all the non elite RAS guys that have been successful for us.
Tbf Davenport, when healthy, also was another success case using it, but the injuries just derailed him so badly.
I think there is enough proof in the opposite direction that they should start to realize that they should lessen the weighting on it now, but still pay attention to it. Don't forget all the non elite RAS guys that have been successful for us.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 3:15 pm to saints5021
The personnel department hasnt perormed. Time for a change. Look at Denver,Green Bay, Philly, Baltimore-WE SUK! MAKE A CHANGE!
Posted on 8/28/25 at 5:12 pm to saints5021
For those who want to understand RAS more:
LINK
So in reality, even players that have low RAS are still players that played in the league and/or participated in the combine.
A low RAS score does NOT mean you cannot play in the nfl, it just means you have to have extremely good technique, knowledge, and a good head on your shoulders to overcome it.
Just because you draft a guy that gets a 5 does not mean he isn't good. On the contrary that is actually average athleticism for that player's position.
So hunting only elite athletes will cause you to miss many actual better players.
LINK
quote:
A RAS score stands for Relative Athletic Score, a metric developed by Kent Lee Platte to evaluate NFL prospects by combining physical measurements (height, weight, etc.) and athletic testing numbers (40-yard dash, vertical jump, etc.) into a single score on a 0-to-10 scale. This score ranks a player's athleticism against other players of the same position, using data from 1987 to the present. A higher RAS score indicates a more exceptional athlete relative to their position, and the scores are color-coded for quick, visual assessment.
So in reality, even players that have low RAS are still players that played in the league and/or participated in the combine.
A low RAS score does NOT mean you cannot play in the nfl, it just means you have to have extremely good technique, knowledge, and a good head on your shoulders to overcome it.
Just because you draft a guy that gets a 5 does not mean he isn't good. On the contrary that is actually average athleticism for that player's position.
So hunting only elite athletes will cause you to miss many actual better players.
Popular
Back to top


12







