- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Man charged with homicide after slipping abortion pills to girlfriend.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:21 am
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:21 am
12
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:28 am to Crimson Wraith
do it.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:28 am to Crimson Wraith
It is only a life if someone other than the mother chooses to kill it. Or something like that.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:33 am to Crimson Wraith
The hierarchy of victimization says the female will win in court.
And due to that:
The precedent is set for calling abortion murder.
The left is slowly killing itself.
And due to that:
The precedent is set for calling abortion murder.
The left is slowly killing itself.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:33 am to Crimson Wraith
I thought a fetus wasn't really a person, thus abortion wasn't really murder? 
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:34 am to Crimson Wraith
Allowing women to kill their babies but not men to kill their babies violates the equal protection clause.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:41 am to Crimson Wraith
Glad he was charged. Now there needs to be some consistency by charging anyone who prescribes such pills or participates in elective abortions.
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 8:41 am
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:43 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Glad he was charged. Now there needs to be some consistency by charging anyone who proscribes such pills or participates in elective abortions.
Or in this case whoever sold it to him on the black market
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:43 am to Crimson Wraith
But that would mean...
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:43 am to dstone12
quote:
The precedent is set for calling abortion murder.
The precedent has ALWAYS been there. If you kill a pregnant woman, you get charged with double homicide. It’s ALWAYS been there.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:54 am to Powerman
quote:Anyone who intentionally kills a child in the womb (the death of the child is the desired outcome) should be charged. Anyone who knowingly and willingly prescribes/provides pills or other methods intended to carry out an abortion should be charged as an accomplice at the very least.
Or in this case whoever sold it to him on the black market
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:59 am to Crimson Wraith
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:09 am to FooManChoo
If so then gun manufacturers will be charged in cases of gun homicides. There are some problems that can’t be fixed minus serious collateral damage. Think Humanity and the “second coming “.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:11 am to dstone12
Maybe but they aren’t eating away at themselves fast enough
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:15 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Anyone who intentionally kills a child in the womb (the death of the child is the desired outcome) should be charged. Anyone who knowingly and willingly prescribes/provides pills or other methods intended to carry out an abortion should be charged as an accomplice at the very least.
What about the pharma companies that developed these medications in the first place?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:16 am to RCDfan1950
quote:That doesn’t follow. Gun manufacturers make weapons that are used for all sorts of reasons, including good ones. If someone provides a weapon to someone who has expressed a desire to use that weapon for murder, then that would be a similar situation and I would say the one who provided the gun should be charged.
If so then gun manufacturers will be charged in cases of gun homicides. There are some problems that can’t be fixed minus serious collateral damage. Think Humanity and the “second coming “.
My statement was about anyone who knowingly and willfully provided the means or the actions to assist with or carry about an elective abortion should be charged. That doesn’t mean the pill manufacturer should be charged, necessarily, as there could be legitimate health reasons why a doctor might prescribe it, such as for Cushings.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:19 am to Powerman
quote:It depends on multiple factors. If they create a drug that cures or helps another disease but it is used in abortions, I don’t blame the drug manufacturer but the doctor who prescribed it for abortion.
What about the pharma companies that developed these medications in the first place?
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:22 am to Crimson Wraith
Woman does it, it’s pro choice. Man does the exact same thing, t’s murder. Gotcha.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 11:27 am to Harald Ekernson
quote:
Allowing women to kill their babies but not men to kill their babies violates the equal protection clause.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 1:52 pm to Crimson Wraith
All he did was exercise his "reproductive health" rights.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News