Started By
Message

USDA to no longer help fund solar & wind farms on productive farmland

Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:26 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27273 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:26 am
quote:

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has banned the use of farmland for the construction of solar installations, effective immediately.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced the decision on X, saying, “Millions of acres of prime farmland is left unusable so Green New Deal subsidized solar panels can be built. This destruction of our farms and prime soil is taking away the futures of the next generation of farmers and the future of our country.”

“Starting today, @USDA will no longer deploy programs to fund solar or wind projects on productive farmland, ending massive taxpayer handouts. Also ENDING the use of panels made by foreign adversaries like China.”

Building solar installations on farmland has become a popular practice in the U.S. and, more recently, in the UK as well, as in other parts of Europe. Solar developers can offer farmers more money to lease their land for solar than they would make from farming it, which has motivated many to accept such deals. Yet concern about this trend has been growing as well, since farmland is used to literally produce food, and replacing food production with electricity production has sparked concerns about food security.

Reuters reports that the Department of Agriculture had previously funded over $2 billion worth of wind and energy projects via its Rural Energy for America program. The publication also cited figures from 2020 as showing the amount of farmland “affected” by wind and solar stood at a total of 424,000 acres, which was less than 0.05% of the nation’s total farmland, which in turn stood at close to 900 million acres, again per Department of Agriculture data. However, chances are that the amount affected by wind and solar has grown since 2020, with the Biden administration’s complete support for all forms of alternative energy with a special focus on wind and solar.


LINK
Posted by spacecitydude
HTX
Member since Nov 2021
223 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:31 am to
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26383 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:31 am to
Thank God.

Covering valuable land with highly subsidized solar farms is just stupid. Solar belongs on top of buildings and parking decks to help build a decentralized grid and provide a boost during peak times.

It doesn't belong on the ground where cattle, crops, or housing should be.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
15823 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:36 am to
It should be banned completely. Solar and especially wind.

They want that fricking nonproductive ugly shite then they should lease property and stick their dumbass solar panels on the fricking roof. What’s wrong with parking garages and hospital roofs?

Why is someone always trying to frick with farmers and our food supply?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76485 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Solar belongs on top of buildings and parking decks to help build a decentralized grid and provide a boost during peak times.

Would like to hear a reason as to why we don’t do this.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
33968 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Solar belongs on top of buildings and parking decks to help build a decentralized grid and provide a boost during peak times.


quote:

Would like to hear a reason as to why we don’t do this.



Makes far too much sense
Posted by MrWhipple
West of the Mississippi
Member since Jun 2016
1138 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:43 am to
Solar has taken wintering ground from migrating birds (waterfowl). Rice fields converted to solar.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16472 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Rural Energy for America

Isn't a utility scale program.

Elimination will do nothing to impact solar and wind farm development.
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 9:48 am
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16472 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Would like to hear a reason as to why we don’t do this.

We do. Every day.
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
3527 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:47 am to
I'm good with cutting it out.

Traveling around, I'm seeing solar farms being constructed on what used to be bean, cotton, and corn crops.

That's not so bad now but within a few years when a new process becomes available, those solar panels are just going to be another messy graveyard of outdated technology. Then the owners will be looking for a government handout to clean it up so they can grow rice on it again.
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 9:54 am
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75814 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Makes far too much sense


A lot of big box stores and Amazon warehouses should double as solar farms.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
33968 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:52 am to
quote:

A lot of big box stores and Amazon warehouses should double as solar farms.



We have an absolute shite ton of distribution warehouses here in Houston that have some prime solar real estate.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75814 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Then the owners will be looking for a government handout to clean it up so they can grow rice on it again.


But also probably remediate whatever those things leach into the ground.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
60358 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:53 am to
This is a matter of semantics, but all farmland is “productive farmland. “ if it weren’t productive, it would have pine trees or houses on it.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26383 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Would like to hear a reason as to why we don’t do this.



It's happening but it's too slow.

Right now - the solar industry for smaller jobs like this is full of sketchy, distrustful fly by night companies. It's hard getting facts and people are reluctant to spend $$$ on something that may not work at all. If you are a homeowner, who do you trust for a proper install?

You want this to take off....we need better quality panels, better quality installers, and more reputable companies involved. I think Tesla's solar roof has a lot of potential.....
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 10:02 am
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17780 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:55 am to
Yet another thing that the trumpkins didn't care about until told to
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26383 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:55 am to
quote:

We have an absolute shite ton of distribution warehouses here in Houston that have some prime solar real estate.



100%.

We should also try to have "covered" parking with solar panel canopies providing shade and electricity.
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9866 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:56 am to
Wind farms are incredibly harmful to the environment. Should ban them outright.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75814 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Wind farms are incredibly harmful to the environment. Should ban them outright.


They're only harmful if you think killing animals and leaving a shite ton of non-recyclable waste is harmful.

ETA: I'm not against wind energy capture in general. I like the sculpture things they put in some cities that capture some wind energy, push it into the grid, and are aesthetically pleasing. It's super small scale, but as part of an all-encompassing strategy, they can help.
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 10:00 am
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26383 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Then the owners will be looking for a government handout to clean it up so they can grow rice on it again.


My parish makes the operates fund a decom plan....which I'm sure is total bullshite. In 25 years a brand new solar farm will not be worth operating. Figure it would take 10 years until someone pulls all of it out of there.

At that point who the hell knows what crap in those cracked and broken panels have leached into the groundwater.

Smaller projects are easier to manage, easier to cleanup, and easier to retrofit when the time comes. And it would help decentralize the grid. It should honestly be mandatory for these data centers that consume a giant amount of power.

Utility providers should seriously consider leasing space on the roof of big box stores, high school gyms, distribution centers, etc. It would at least help generate power for a small area if there's a disruption elsewhere in their network.
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 10:03 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram