- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump and Murdoch
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:41 pm
Trump just sued Rupert, along with the Wall Street Journal. I get why he sued the WSJ. But why Murdoch?
I am NOT a political junkie. But I thought those two would be aligned.
Can someone explain this to me?
I am NOT a political junkie. But I thought those two would be aligned.
Can someone explain this to me?
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:42 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
Murdoch has never liked Trump.
Trump should sue that Australian fricker

Trump should sue that Australian fricker

Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:43 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
No, but Barack Obama is in deep shite.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:06 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
Isn’t it the kids that are little shits.
Plus, remember when they called 2020
Plus, remember when they called 2020
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:36 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
He’s suing to posture and sound tough. It’s why he did all the goofy projecting (“powerhouse lawsuit”
)
You don’t have to like the WSJ but they’re not stupid. They didn’t run the story unless they knew on good authority it would hold up to legitimate legal scrutiny.
When MAGA realizes they have the goods they’ll quickly pivot hard to “who cares”. Which, to be fair, should be nobody (Dems included).
The whole Epstein thing is a catastrophe of his own making, but this letter thing is a small side show and isn’t ultimately what anyone really cares about. Client lists (if they exist) is what ppl want.
You don’t have to like the WSJ but they’re not stupid. They didn’t run the story unless they knew on good authority it would hold up to legitimate legal scrutiny.
When MAGA realizes they have the goods they’ll quickly pivot hard to “who cares”. Which, to be fair, should be nobody (Dems included).
The whole Epstein thing is a catastrophe of his own making, but this letter thing is a small side show and isn’t ultimately what anyone really cares about. Client lists (if they exist) is what ppl want.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:37 pm to mwade91383
What will you say when they pay Trump a few million for his library? LOL, will you come back?
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:38 pm to Sofaking2
Sure.
What will you say when he doesn’t?
What will you say when he doesn’t?
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:38 pm to mwade91383
WSJ as trustworthy and solid as CBS.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:42 pm to Jbird
WSJ’s parent company Dow Jones, earlier today: “We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.”
If you thought anything different, you’re listening to clowns.
If you thought anything different, you’re listening to clowns.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:44 pm to mwade91383
Oh noes they are fully behind a company they own.
fricking shocker!
fricking shocker!
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:45 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
Entire Murdoch family is slime. Pure trash.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:46 pm to mwade91383
Absolutely, but I’m not a liberal leftist so I have no issue admitting if I am wrong. Trump has a pretty good track record so far. Your leftists have been looking pretty stupid so far trashing Trump for these lawsuits, lol You will need some SFP level cope. LOL
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:47 pm to Jbird
Won’t be the last time you’re shocked by this story
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:48 pm to mwade91383
quote:
WSJ’s parent company Dow Jones, earlier today: “We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.”
If you thought anything different, you’re listening to clowns.
Just like Paramount was 100% behind CBS and 60 Minutes. I'm sure their wing of the library will be nice.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:49 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
I am NOT a political junkie. But I thought those two would be aligned.
IDK about them personally, but people forget how hard Fox personalities went on Trump in the 2016 primary.
It backfired, of course, because they were giving him more airtime than all the other candidates combined.
Paul Ryan is also on the Fox board now, and not a Trumper.
Lou Dobbs was probably the Fox personality closest to Trump, and Fox dumped him after the 2020 election.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:50 pm to mwade91383
I was blown away by CBS coughing up the dough.
Then cutting a fools throat and cancelling his shitty show.
Then cutting a fools throat and cancelling his shitty show.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:50 pm to SpartanSoul
Were they? Can you link me to that statement?
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:56 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Were they? Can you link me to that statement?
quote:
“The Interview was not doctored; and 60 MINUTES did not hide any part of the Vice President’s answer to the question at issue. 60 MINUTES fairly presented the Interview to inform the viewing audience, and not to mislead it. The lawsuit Trump has brought today against CBS is completely without merit and we will vigorously defend against it,” the spokesperson continued.
quote:
vigorously defend
https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/media/trump-cbs-lawsuit-harris-60-minutes-interview
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:59 pm to Jbird
quote:
I was blown away by CBS coughing up the dough.
Then cutting a fools throat and cancelling his shitty show.
Paramount who owns CBS is trying to sell itself in an $8bn merger with Skydance. Axing shitty programs and settling the Trumo suit is just business.
Popular
Back to top

10







