Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Chevron Closes Megadeal for Hess After Winning Exxon Arbitration

Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:10 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27179 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:10 am
quote:

An arbitration panel cleared the way for Chevron to complete its $53 billion purchase of Hess, dismissing Exxon Mobil’s claim that it had a contractual right to bid for Hess’s crown-jewel assets in Guyana.

The ruling handed down Friday from the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris resolves an often tense and long-running dispute between the two largest descendants of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil monopoly over one of the world’s most coveted oil projects. Chevron originally struck the deal for Hess in October 2023.

Exxon threw a wrench in Chevron’s plans last year when it asserted a right to pre-empt its rival’s bid for Hess’s 30% stake in Guyana’s prolific Stabroek offshore block. Chevron had argued a right-of-first-refusal on the Guyana project wouldn’t apply to the corporate takeover of Hess.

Exxon’s move to block the deal stunned the oil industry, which hadn’t seen titanic oil companies battle to these extremes since a court fight with Pennzoil forced Texaco into bankruptcy in the 1980s.

Just hours after Friday’s decision was announced, Chevron said it had closed its deal for Hess, and that it plans to nominate John Hess, the smaller company’s longtime chief executive, to its board. The Federal Trade Commission had set aside orders Thursday that had previously barred Hess from serving on Chevron’s board.

“It has been a long process, and it didn’t need to be,” Chevron CEO Mike Wirth said in an interview. “It’s unfortunate that Hess’s employees and shareholders were put through such an extended timeline. It should have been resolved quicker. The outcome was never in doubt.”

Exxon said that it disagreed with the ICC panel’s interpretation but respects the arbitration process. The company added that it had a duty to its investors to consider its pre-emption rights.


quote:

With a 45% stake in the Guyana project, Exxon operates vessels that are currently pumping about 650,000 barrels of oil a day. China’s Cnooc, which sided with Exxon in the dispute, has a 25% stake. The oil companies aim to produce 1.2 million barrels daily by 2027, turning the tiny South American country of 800,000 people into one of the world’s largest oil producers by capita.

The dispute hinged on the interpretation of several lines in a joint operating agreement signed more than a decade ago that governs the consortium. Hess had entered the partnership in 2014 when it acquired its stake from Shell. Some joint operating agreements allow existing partners to participate in ownership changes and pre-empt offers for ownership stakes with an offer of their own.


quote:

The arbitration was considered a must-win for Chevron. The Houston-based oil company is reshaping itself after a tough year. It is restructuring parts of its business and parting ways with some 8,000 workers by the end of next year, in an effort to trim costs. Chevron’s stock-market performance has lagged behind that of Exxon over the past few years.

Investors and analysts had said Chevron’s oil-and-gas portfolio needed a boost for it to have sufficient production growth after 2030. If the Hess deal had broken down, it would have had to seek another large acquisition target, they said.


LINK

This is HUGE for Chevron, and possibly for any BD/Land/Legal negotiating folks who were part of advising to pull the 53 Billion trigger on this acquisition and hoping to hang on to their jobs. The Guyana position was THE reason to buy Hess.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133003 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

parting ways with some 8,000 workers by the end of next year, in an effort to trim costs.



Amazing how it's always killing jobs and not minimally reducing the bonuses and golden parachutes of upper management
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37867 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:25 am to
Much better thsm the Andarko deal
Posted by Herschal
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2011
2100 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:46 am to
quote:

The dispute hinged on the interpretation of several lines in a joint operating agreement signed more than a decade ago that governs the consortium.


I'd like to take a look at this JOA and see the language. It should have been fairly obvious as to who had the rights.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47115 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:48 am to
quote:

turning the tiny South American country of 800,000 people into one of the world’s largest oil producers by capita.


Will be interesting to see if the government steals all the money or if the citizens get part of their resources
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
32588 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Amazing how it's always killing jobs and not minimally reducing the bonuses and golden parachutes of upper management


That’s the California inside of you speaking
Posted by Areddishfish
The Wild West
Member since Oct 2015
6423 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

the two largest descendants of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil monopoly


Just a casual reminder of how hilariously wealthy Rockefeller was.
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
9622 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:59 am to


Posted by tharre4
Member since Jan 2015
617 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:09 am to
quote:

quote:
parting ways with some 8,000 workers by the end of next year, in an effort to trim costs.



Amazing how it's always killing jobs and not minimally reducing the bonuses and golden parachutes of upper management


what it doesn't says is that those 8k domestic workers will be replaces by remote workers in India
Posted by ReedRothchild07
Member since Nov 2024
26 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:15 am to
I’d imagine the language was fairly obvious in Chevron’s favor, but if this was an unforeseen circumstance ten years ago, it was probably in broad enough terms Exxon had no choice but to challenge given the impact.
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
23044 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:17 am to
Imagine the kickbacks that went on to get that approved.
Posted by ReedRothchild07
Member since Nov 2024
26 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:21 am to
The only certainty with JOA’s is that lawyers representing both parties will make bank if there is a disagreement.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
8831 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:34 am to
Not a shocker. Chevron was going to win. Exxon was simply being dicks , like they always do .
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram