- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Diddy found GUILTY of transport for prostitution, NOT GUILTY on the more serious charges.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:34 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 7/2/25 at 9:40 am
34
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:36 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
My guess: Guilty on all counts
ETA: counts 2-5. Think the racketeering is meh.
ETA: counts 2-5. Think the racketeering is meh.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:36 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:37 pm to Jobin
He'll beat the Rico and go down on the rest.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:37 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
I think he walks
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:38 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
Apparently the judge has sent the jury back to continue deliberating count 1.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:40 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
go down on the rest.
ISWYDT
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:40 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
Should be not guilty, but he will be found guilty.
He is a POS though
He is a POS though
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:42 pm to Jobin
quote:
Guilty on all counts
Dude is a giant POS and into some of the weirdest shite, but I just don’t see how the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt, that he committed those crimes he is being charged.
They hit hard on a lot he did outside the actual charges, but from what I’ve read from courtroom reporters, there is a lot of doubt vs the actual statute.
It is weird they would be hung on the racketeering though, and find him not guilty on the rest.
Whole thing is crazy
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:51 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
The prosecution focused on the sex parties. I guess that got them headlines, but it was obvious he was leading a criminal enterprise. Racketeering should have been the focus.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:52 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:
but it was obvious he was leading a criminal enterprise.
Obvious to who? Care to elaborate?
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:53 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
Can you get baby oil from the prison commissary?
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:53 pm to Christopher Columbo
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:54 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
I think he walks.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:54 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:
but it was obvious he was leading a criminal enterprise
But the crimes were getting drugs for the orgies and bringing in stunt cocks for the orgies.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:56 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
They hit hard on a lot he did outside the actual charges, but from what I’ve read from courtroom reporters, there is a lot of doubt vs the actual statute
Obviously, I didn’t watch the whole thing. In fact, I just got blurbs here and there. However, from what I did hear, it sounds like all these women did everything they did completely voluntarily. and, they consented to everything. It was some sick shite, but he didn’t force anyone to do anything. These women just liked being around all that money and power - especially the money. And now that they’ve been discarded, they are pissed and want some sort of revenge.
I just couldn’t see how it was illegal. Sick, twisted, and demented? Absolutely.
In hindsight was it degrading, humiliating, and demeaning? No fricking doubt.
But it just seemed like it was completely consensual.
Again, I didn’t see all the testimony or any evidence. So maybe there’s something in there showing that he forced people to do this shite. But they seemed to be there voluntarily just because they wanted to live the high life using Diddy’s money. There's nothing illegal about that.
Having said all of that, obviously him dragging his girlfriend out in that hotel by her hair and punching her is a crime. Therefore, if it’s not subject to the statute of limitations, he should be tried for some sort of domestic abuse. But I don’t even think that should’ve been used during the trial for the rest of the charges. It seems to be more prejudicial than probative.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:56 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
It is weird they would be hung on the racketeering though, and find him not guilty on the rest.
Am I just dumb or didn't they return guilty on all those?
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:57 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
stunt cocks
Imma add that to my LinkedIn.
Thanks SF22!
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:57 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Dude is a giant POS and into some of the weirdest shite
So should he serve his time on ...
#1 Soccer Board
#2 Poli Board
#3 Food Board
#4 Other (specify)
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:57 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
Apparently the judge has sent the jury back to continue deliberating count 1.
Likely sent the jury back with an Allen aka dynamite charge to "force" them to reach a verdict OR deadlock on the remaining counts.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News