- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Creationism and Evolution Questions
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:20 pm
I have many questions. Two of my bigger ones are below. Please help me understand how you understand. I am fascinated by peoples’ different ways of thinking.
1. How do Creationists reconcile its incestuous design (brothers and sisters required to make babies to create the world’s population)?
2. How do Evolutionists rationalize the (incomprehensibly) the amazing design of life (when I think of all of the chemistry, physics and humanness in this system of life that enables me to post this and you to respond (from existence of photons and wavelengths of light to your occipital lobe of brain existing to accept it, ascribe meaning to it and your human body and experience to respond to it - I ask - just random chance, aye?). How dat is?
Share dat thinking on these ?s please.
Most appreciated.
1. How do Creationists reconcile its incestuous design (brothers and sisters required to make babies to create the world’s population)?
2. How do Evolutionists rationalize the (incomprehensibly) the amazing design of life (when I think of all of the chemistry, physics and humanness in this system of life that enables me to post this and you to respond (from existence of photons and wavelengths of light to your occipital lobe of brain existing to accept it, ascribe meaning to it and your human body and experience to respond to it - I ask - just random chance, aye?). How dat is?
Share dat thinking on these ?s please.
Most appreciated.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:23 pm to Artificial Ignorance
Both can be correct.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:24 pm to Artificial Ignorance
This thread will be a shitshow and I'm here for it.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:27 pm to Artificial Ignorance
I'm sure this thread won't go off the rails
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:28 pm to Artificial Ignorance
God created evolution. Next question...
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:35 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
How do Evolutionists rationalize the (incomprehensibly) the amazing design of life (when I think of all of the chemistry, physics and humanness in this system of life that enables me to post this and you to respond (from existence of photons and wavelengths of light to your occipital lobe of brain existing to accept it, ascribe meaning to it and your human body and experience to respond to it - I ask - just random chance, aye?). How dat is?
You raise good points, but the missing closed parenthesis in this paragraph is throwing me off.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:35 pm to Artificial Ignorance
If I'm correct, scripture does indicate multiple sons and daughters born to Adam and Eve. Their son Cain, was banished to Nod, where there were people. This was east of Eden. Incest was not forbidden until the time of Moses, so it was acceptable prior. How do I accept this?
I simply do.
I simply do.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:36 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
How do Evolutionists rationalize the (incomprehensibly) the amazing design of life (when I think of all of the chemistry, physics and humanness in this system of life that enables me to post this and you to respond (from existence of photons and wavelengths of light to your occipital lobe of brain existing to accept it, ascribe meaning to it and your human body and experience to respond to it - I ask - just random chance, aye?). How dat is?
Millions of years.
We’re amazed with ourselves at our level of understanding. But what the universe really is is beyond our comprehension. Amazing as we think we are, what else is out there that our primitive brain can’t reconcile?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:40 pm to BestBanker
quote:
If I'm correct, scripture does indicate multiple sons and daughters born to Adam and Eve. Their son Cain, was banished to Nod, where there were people. This was east of Eden. Incest was not forbidden until the time of Moses, so it was acceptable prior. How do I accept this?
I simply do
Adam and Eve didn't have the genetic defects we have today. There were several generations after the curse that didn't have the risk of genetic defects we have today.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:41 pm to Artificial Ignorance
If that’s a problem for you, you need to talk to some kind of pastor or priest and have them explain it.
If it’s not, then you can accept both to be true.
If it’s not, then you can accept both to be true.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:42 pm to nealnan8
quote:
God created evolution. Next question...
I don't have an issue with this stance
The young earth stuff is what is really nonsense
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:47 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
1. How do Creationists reconcile its incestuous design (brothers and sisters required to make babies to create the world’s population)?
This issue exists no matter how you believe we started.
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:51 pm to Powerman
quote:
I don't have an issue with this stance
So you've changed over the years?

Posted on 6/13/25 at 7:52 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
1. How do Creationists reconcile its incestuous design (brothers and sisters required to make babies to create the world’s population)?
What's to reconcile?
If we assume the Adam and Eve story is literal, and not allegorical, what is the point of your question?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:03 pm to brewhan davey
quote:
You raise good points, but the missing closed parenthesis in this paragraph is throwing me off.
Creationist answer: the wavelengths of light provided your life design (the eye) to capture dat light and occipital nerve to send chemical process to your brain’s occipital lobe to deconstruct that chemistry and other brain parts to re-construct it into chemistry that your human design ascribes meaning to. And your amygdala to get pissed off that a man made construct called a parentheses, that should have open and closed ends, but did not, creating the emotion that drove your response…and stop there…excluding all of the musculoskeletal, endocrine, cardio vascular, and central nervous system collective coordination to have you express your displeasure with my post. And she ate the apple part of course.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:06 pm to m2pro
quote:
what is the point of your question?
Dat a sister accepted sperm of her brother (repeat, rinse, repeat again and again) to create you (and me). Yikes.
Dat is the point of my question.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:08 pm to BestBanker
quote:
Incest was not forbidden until the time of Moses, so it was acceptable prior. How do I accept this? I simply do.
Should you? If qualified as forbidden (ever)…
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:10 pm to YouKnowImRight
quote:
Adam and Eve didn't have the genetic defects we have today. There were several generations after the curse that didn't have the risk of genetic defects we have today.
If point A leads to point B, there is a relationship. No genetic defects on one end of timeline leads to genetic defects on other end of timeline. Worthy of questioning, no?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:11 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Dat a sister accepted sperm of her brother (repeat, rinse, repeat again and again) to create you (and me). Yikes.
Dat is the point of my question.
You are not commonly accused of being too bright, are you?
Popular
Back to top
