- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Clinton Judge sides with Newsom. Orders Trump to Return Control of National Guard
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:04 pm
Frick him.
LINK
quote:
“At this early stage of the proceedings, the Court must determine whether the President followed the congressionally mandated procedure for his actions. He did not. His actions were illegal — both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,” the judge wrote.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 9:06 pm
21
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:05 pm to BCreed1
Already challenged after ruling. Trump admin on top of it.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:05 pm to BCreed1
POTUS needs to ignore this bullshite, no one made the judge CiC
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:06 pm to GeauxBurrow312
Exactly.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:08 pm to BCreed1
For fricks sake
I guess all we need in this country now is judicial branch
They seem to decide every damn thing
I guess all we need in this country now is judicial branch
They seem to decide every damn thing
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:08 pm to BCreed1
Then he is a domestic enemy and the National Guard is sworn to defend us against him.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:09 pm to momentoftruth87
The opinion was well-written. we’ll see.
SCOTUS will be hesitant to greenlight
military in the streets.
SCOTUS will be hesitant to greenlight
military in the streets.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:09 pm to VOR
What’s the point of having an executive then?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:09 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Clinton Judge sides with Newsom
This has every sign that this was just a political judgment. It will be dropped or reversed (if it hasn't already been already) very soon.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:10 pm to GeauxBurrow312
Seriously.. what the frick are they going to do if he tells these activist judges to frick off?
Not a damn thing
Not a damn thing
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:11 pm to VOR
quote:
SCOTUS will be hesitant to greenlight
military in the streets.
Who is responsible to protect federal personnel against harm if the state won't do it? Hesitant, my arse.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:11 pm to VOR
quote:
The opinion was well-written. we’ll see.
That doesnt make it right. There is precedent for Trump's actions. None for Breyer's.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:12 pm to BCreed1
We have a SCOTUS case on point saying this is a nonjusticiable case!
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:12 pm to VOR
quote:
The opinion was well-written. we’ll see.
SCOTUS will be hesitant to greenlight
military in the streets.
I'll say this, your consistent.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:14 pm to VOR
quote:
No justiciable controversy is presented in this case, as the relief sought by respondents, requiring initial judicial review and continuing judicial surveillance over the training, weaponry, and standing orders of the National Guard, embraces critical areas of responsibility vested by the Constitution, see Art. I, § 8, cl. 16, in the Legislative and Executive Branches of the Government. Pp. 413 U. S. 5-12.
How does our learned trial judge distinguish Gilligan v. Morgan?
Edit:
Answered my own question—the judge basically skips over the standing analysis. What a horrible opinion.
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:14 pm to VOR
quote:
SCOTUS will be hesitant to greenlight military in the streets.
Then SCOTUS will supporting terrorism.
You goose-steppers are a violent bunch that truly hate America.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:22 pm to VOR
quote:
The opinion was well-written
Not really
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:24 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Not only that the outcome was never in doubt with this judge.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:27 pm to BCreed1
tell that judge to eat shite and die!
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:27 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
The opinion is a joke. The founding fathers never imagined that lowly federal district court judges would someday be dictating control over military matters or the national guard.
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 9:28 pm
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News