Started By
Message
locked post

Nuclear Lobby Fights Back as GOP Slashes Clean Energy Incentives

Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:11 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27273 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:11 pm
quote:

Last week, Republican legislators caused an uproar in wind and solar circles by proposing what amounts to a decimation of subsidies for these industries—and EVs as well. But the lawmakers did not stop with wind and solar. They are cutting incentives for nuclear as well. The nuclear industry is up in arms. It has AI movers and shakers on its side.

Last Monday, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce proposed phasing out tax credits linked to climate policies stipulated in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. This, per the Committee, will raise some $6.5 billion. The House Ways and Means Committee also proposed phasing out various tax incentives, aiming to fuel the expansion of wind and solar energy, electric vehicles, and other transition technologies.

Naturally, wind and solar companies were less than happy to hear this, especially since they’d been lobbying legislators hard in the months since President Trump took office. The lobbying effort has focused on legislators representing districts that have been on the receiving end of IRA subsidies and on scare tactics about job losses and a worsened outlook for “American families”.

Nuclear has also joined the push against subsidy phaseout with its own lobbying effort. According to a Financial Times report from Sunday, the industry has been lobbying Congress to stop short of removing subsidies for new nuclear facilities, and it has been lobbying it hard. One nuclear tech firm, Oklo, linked financially to OpenAI’s Sam Altman, for instance, upped its spending on lobbying by 500% on the year to 424,000. Constellation Energy, Microsoft’s partner in Three Mile Island, spent more than $1.7 million on lobbying in the first quarter, a 17% annual increase, per the FT.



quote:

Data centers and artificial intelligence—this is what is driving the nuclear rush that has benefited from the IRA incentives that GOP legislators now want to remove, along with wind, solar, and EV subsidies. Artificial intelligence is pushing electricity demand higher, and the outlook for this demand is so unanimously bullish that the need for more generating capacity is taken for granted. The thing about nuclear is that it costs a pretty penny upfront, and it’s nice to have a part of that financial burden shouldered by a cooperative federal government.


quote:

The tax credits are also essential for large-scale new nuclear because of the price tag it tends to come with—and Republicans in the Senate know it.

This is the good news for the nuclear industry: Senate legislators who don’t mind slashing subsidies for wind and solar do mind slashing them for nuclear and some have already indicated the authors of the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” would have to make some changes if they want it to pass the upper house of Congress.

North Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, for instance, has an idea of removing only the subsidies for wind and solar but not for nuclear.


quote:

Indeed, businesses relying on federal subsidies tend to get stuck in ruts. Look no further than wind and solar for evidence of this. These industries are a lot more active in the lobbying push right now because they know they will not survive for long without subsidies—and they have long forgotten how to compete on the free market. The nuclear industry, hopefully, has a better memory about that.


LINK
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76485 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

North Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, for instance, has an idea of removing only the subsidies for wind and solar but not for nuclear.
Scruffy is ok with that.

Wind and solar can’t hold a radioactive candle to nuclear.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:26 pm
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
86251 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

instance, upped its spending on lobbying by 500% on the year to 424,000.
Posted by nerd guy
Grapevine
Member since Dec 2008
13681 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:22 pm to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112154 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

quote:
North Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, for instance, has an idea of removing only the subsidies for wind and solar but not for nuclear.
Scruffy is ok with that


As is udtiger.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27273 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

As is udtiger.


As is ragincajun03.

The approval of us three together should ignite a re-write of this bill tonight. Thank you for being true movers and shakers.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35751 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

Scruffy is ok with that. Wind and solar can’t hold a radioactive candle to nuclear


Agreed. There should also be a subclassification of green energy options: green reliable and inexpensive (nuclear) and green unreliable and very expensive (wind, solar).
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:32 pm
Posted by Brightside Bengal
New Metairie
Member since Sep 2007
3943 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:34 pm to
This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16495 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:35 pm to
They’re all, except 25D individual solar tax credit, going to be kept in but in accelerated phase outs. That’s still a death sentence for nuclear unfortunately unless there a safe harbor provision
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:44 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76485 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.
100%
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28077 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.


Need the current generation of old timers to die off, they remember 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl and its scary to them.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16495 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

Need the current generation of old timers to die off, they remember 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl and its scary to them.

It’s usually local politicians, lawyers, judges, etc that are pissed they aren’t getting the lease or easements. Normal people can’t put up a fight.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31302 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:42 pm to
Nuclear is what we should be pushing to make cheaper.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28077 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:44 pm to
quote:


Nuclear is what we should be pushing to make cheaper.


I think most people know this is the way to go, but good luck finding a place to put the reactors.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71321 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Data centers and artificial intelligence—this is what is driving the nuclear rush that has benefited from the IRA incentives that GOP legislators now want to remove,

Cool. Let those frickers pay for their own energy needs and stop expecting the fricking taxpayer to subside the rapid growth of AI. They want it? They can pay for it.

ETA: I was told by someone here a while ago that the taxpayer wasn't footing the infrastructure bill for these tech giants and their energy needs.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:52 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170477 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

There should also be a subclassification of green energy options: green reliable and inexpensive (nuclear) and green unreliable and very expensive (wind, solar).

One of the myths about nuclear is that it's cheap

It's reliable as you correctly stated but it's not cheap

And wind and solar are no longer as expensive as most people think. They're just not as reliable.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35751 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.


That’s intentional. Progressives hate nuclear because it solves the problem of clean energy too well. They need to push the “hard” solutions because it takes longer and allows them to use it as a Trojan horse for their other social ideology.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28077 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

One of the myths about nuclear is that it's cheap


Eh, initial cost is staggering. Steady state is actually pretty cheap compared to other sources of energy.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
9565 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:10 pm to
easy fix, just simplify the beauracratic work necessary and save every one a ton of money
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58277 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:38 pm to
Baton rouge has one.....so does new Orleans.... Seems people here accept it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram