Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Lets talk fracking!

Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:00 am
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2488 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:00 am
Its a topic i have extensive knowledge on.

1) to lift oil requires pressure within a reservoir.
2) to have oil to lift the reservoir requires a mobility pathway to the well.

An oil (or gas) well is drilled at approximately
1,100 - 16,500 ft depending on application.

The average ground water well in the U.S. is drilled to somewhere between 100 and 800 ft depending upon the basin.

Speaking in hypotheticals, let us pretend I request a frack on a 2,000 ft (3/8 of a mile) deep vertical well.

Let us pretend that I put enough sand, under enough pressure, to fracture not only the matrix i am producing but its cap rock, and 1,200 feet of the ground above it.

Let us pretend this causes a direct pathway for gas under pressure to eventually reach someone’s drinking water.

Let us pretend that my fracture is solely responsible for this pathway. (No one abandoned an old, shitty well nearby and did a bad cement job).

Let us (not) pretend that someone makes a documentary about fracking, in which, a drunken, schizo PA citizen lights his tap water on fire.

Let us (not) pretend that this becomes a national issue for the next 18 years.

Now - if I fractured that well. And caused or (not) cause all of that would i remain viable as an engineer or producer?



Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:10 am to
You mean liable, not viable, right? Yes you would be liable. But if you screwed up my water resources on my land the least I’m worried about is the natural gas.

But this is an extremely rare situation you are laying out here.
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2488 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:12 am to
No viable. Would i be working if i fractured 1,200 feet above my producing wellhead.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
89739 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:13 am to
SWD wells are far more dangerous and detrimental to the environment than fracking could ever be
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2488 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:13 am to
Its a fricking impossible situation and that is the entire point.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
9561 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:14 am to
way to much pretending taking place
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2488 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:16 am to
Ok lets simplify it. If frac pop balloon - no oil come.
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
9265 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Its a fricking impossible situation and that is the entire point.


In order to make a point it helps to make sense. No one can make sense of that mess in your OP

Looks like you’re drunk as shite, and that’s ok
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2488 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:22 am to
Ah thats fair.

Cheers.

Anyways cant believ that dumbshit is still even on anyones radar as an argument.

Oil reservoir deep deep below water. Cant make oil if balloon pop. Oil go to water, oil not come through pipe.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
18916 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 3:53 am to
quote:

Canada_Baw
Is there a reciprocal tariff on message board posts?
quote:

Let us (not) pretend that someone makes a documentary about fracking, in which, a drunken, schizo PA citizen lights his tap water on fire.
In many places this water contamination occurs near historic oil seeps (was common in parts of PA) and coal seams [methane] (still common in parts of PA) but as you directly are addressing frac'g occurred below that.

It's either an indirect link or a false cause-result relationship.

I'm convinced the rest are due to poor surface and intermediary casing jobs and the gas migration into freshwater reservoir rock is during the production phase over time.
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
10751 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 4:19 am to
quote:

Let us pretend that my fracture is solely responsible for this pathway. (No one abandoned an old, shitty well nearby and did a bad cement job).

Let us (not) pretend that someone makes a documentary about fracking, in which, a drunken, schizo PA citizen lights his tap water on fire.


In the Haynesville you wouldn't have any pipes for water to flow through from your water well to your house if fracking was responsible for the gas in your faucet. The pressure would rupture the PVC immediately because it is in the thousands of PSI.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
7928 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 6:19 am to
quote:

Canada_Baw


Thanks for the thread, something different.
Posted by FLTech
Member since Sep 2017
24763 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 7:50 am to
Let’s pretend nothing in your post happens. Let’s just pretend
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23353 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 7:51 am to
Most of the perceived outrage is related to the increased activity that came from horizontal drilling. I would guess most of that is typically close to a mile below the surface at minimum (typically more); therefore, I wouldn’t even bring up vertical wells or disposal wells with this topic as they are totally different businesses/activities.

Your post did come across as a drunk post.
This post was edited on 5/4/25 at 8:00 am
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26257 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 7:57 am to
quote:

In order to make a point it helps to make sense. No one can make sense of that mess in your OP


It made perfect sense to me. Puzzled at the downvotes on the OP.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 8:01 am to
gotcha? That what you looking for

why do you sky screamers always look at the outliner hypotheticals in order to fear monger?

Oh, and you are a troll
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2488 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 8:28 am to
Let me attempt to clarify. I was drunk and i was laying out the hypothetical in complete mockery of the ridiculousness of the argument against fracking.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
32667 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 8:41 am to
Fracking sucks. We have plenty enough deep well oil not to need to invest in such a shitty inefficient process that destroys the land and creates tons of waste
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45719 posts
Posted on 5/4/25 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Ah thats fair.

Cheers.

Anyways cant believ that dumbshit is still even on anyones radar as an argument.

Oil reservoir deep deep below water. Cant make oil if balloon pop. Oil go to water, oil not come through pipe.


Trying to decide if I'm gonna upvote or downvote for your attempts at appropriating native American speech cadence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram