- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Colorado drillers must recycle frac water starting in 2026 under first-in-the-nation rule
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:52 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:52 am
quote:
To reduce the need for fresh fracking water, the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission, on April 8 issued first-in-the-nation regulations requiring 4% of the water from oil and gas production to be recycled starting in 2026 and rising to as much as 35% by 2038.
The amount of water used for fracking — or hydrofracturing — in Colorado is minor, averaging 1.7% of the state’s total water consumption between 2011 and 2020.
“Conservation in the oil and gas industry doesn’t have as big an impact as a similar amount of conservation from the agricultural community,” ECMC Commissioner John Messner told The Colorado Sun. “That’s your biggest water user in the state.”
quote:
The water that comes back out of a well, known as produced water, is a mixture of the water that went down and water that was in the rock formation — often saltwater from prehistoric seas. It is also mixed with oil, mud and sand.
Industry executives say one challenge is the scale of infrastructure that will be needed to cope with recycling produced water. A second problem is the fact that on the Front Range only a fraction of the water that goes down the hole comes back up.
“This makes it difficult to source sufficient volumes of produced water to recycle for the completion of a new well,” Seth Gordon, an engineer for Chevron U.S.A. Inc., said in commission testimony.
quote:
The regulations provide that when recycling begins in 2026, operators only have to use 2% recycled water the first year and then 4% during the next three years. In 2030, the target will be raised to 10%.
The new rules zero in on the Denver-Julesburg or DJ Basin, which consumes 90% of the freshwater used in fracking in Colorado, but recycles less than 1% of its produced water.
quote:
By contrast, the Western Slope’s Piceance Basin uses less than 1% of the freshwater and recycles 92% of its produced water.
There are several reasons there has been so little recycling on the Front Range. One is geology. The amount of water in rock strata varies from basin to basin. In the DJ Basin only 30% to 40% of the fracking water sent down a well comes back up.
“We get about eight barrels of oil for every barrel of water in the DJ,” said Grant Tupper, a business development director for water recycler Select Water Solutions. In Texas’ Permian Basin, he said, there are approximately eight barrels of water for every barrel of oil.
quote:
In other basins, those large amounts of produced water are waste that must be dealt with. In the Piceance, Colorado’s largest water-producing basin, it has led to an extensive network of pipelines and recycling facilities.
“Not having to deal with that produced water certainly creates better economics for operators (in the DJ) than it does in other areas of the country,” Messner said. As a result, there is little recycling infrastructure on the Front Range.
The DJ Basin has the fewest pipelines for carrying produced water and as a result the basin is more dependent on trucks for hauling produced and recycled water, according to a consortium report.
LINK /
Baws…if only we could build a huge arse pipeline to send that Permian saltwater up to Colorado for them to have more than enough to use.
Gravity would be a son of a bitch. Get to work, you geek engineers.

Might not be long before Texas and New Mexico implement something like this. Especially New Mexico.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 7:55 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:54 am to ragincajun03
Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:58 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Might not be long before Texas and New Mexico implement something like this
With the takeover of the state legislature, it wouldn't surprise me. Abbott would veto it however.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:59 am to turnpiketiger
quote:
Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?
CO bends over backwards for their ski resorts. I thought I was going to live the rest of my life there, but they just can't stop with stupid laws. Literally was paying 10 cents a goddamn shopping bag for the homeless.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:02 am to turnpiketiger
quote:
Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?
You think they are using tap water to make snow?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:18 am to idlewatcher
quote:
With the takeover of the state legislature, it wouldn't surprise me. Abbott would veto it however.
The more seismic activity out there in West TX, it may be tough to avoid. TX Railroad Commission has already curtailed injection rates for permits in some regions, and flat out hasn’t approved any more in others.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:20 am to Jcorye1
quote:
CO bends over backwards for their ski resorts. I thought I was going to live the rest of my life there, but they just can't stop with stupid laws. Literally was paying 10 cents a goddamn shopping bag for the homeless.
If I were going to live in one of those mountain west states I’d probably go with Utah. You still get skiing and pretty much the same stuff Colorado offers but without the liberal political nonsense.
In fact Utah is almost too conservative. Total polar opposite. I’d even consider northern New Mexico. Taos is spectacular and you’re not far from Denver for big city amenities
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:21 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Baws…if only we could build a huge arse pipeline to send that Permian saltwater up to Colorado for them to have more than enough to use.
Sometime soon, EPA is going to open up the O&G wastewater ELGs (Subpart E) to expand the allowable discharge of treated produced water nation wide.
Not a matter of if but when.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:23 am to turnpiketiger
quote:
Utah
Sidebar, but is polygamy really still a thing there?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:26 am to idlewatcher
quote:
With the takeover of the state legislature, it wouldn't surprise me. Abbott would veto it however.
Wtf are you talking about

Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:27 am to ragincajun03
I'm okay with taking measures to make fracking as environmentally healthy as possible.
I see no problem with this.
I see no problem with this.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:36 am to turnpiketiger
My wife and I are relatively sure we'll end up back in Mountain time, so it'll be whatever state we can buy land and doesn't hate guns.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:38 am to turnpiketiger
quote:
Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?

Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:39 am to N2cars
quote:
Sidebar, but is polygamy really still a thing there?
Not trying to be a prick but please tell me you’re joking. Surely people don’t actually still think that’s a legit legal thing in Utah.
It was a huge ordeal for a long time many years ago then the state of Utah finally put their foot down and the LDS church ended it officially. There are still some small groups who left the LDS Church to form their own branch so they could retain their multiple 12 year old wives but I don’t think that’s technically legal it’s some loophole people are exploiting. By people I mean very very few people.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:42 am to N2cars
quote:
Sidebar, but is polygamy really still a thing there?
Are there polygamists here in Utah. Short answer, yes.
But in the 25 years I've lived here, I can count on 1 hand the number of times I've seen them.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:49 am to turnpiketiger
No, obviously I realize it wasn't/isn't widespread, but I thought there may be small communities where it still might be a thing.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:09 am to Jcorye1
quote:
My wife and I are relatively sure we'll end up back in Mountain time, so it'll be whatever state we can buy land and doesn't hate guns.
Wyoming is your best option for affordable land and gun loving.
I always thought southern Wyoming like Laramie or Cheyenne would be nice. I want to be away from super populated areas but still relatively close to a city like Denver. Like if I needed to go to the airport I don’t want to drive 6 hours. Southern Wyoming would mean we could easily take day trips to Denver metro and go back home to our gun loving affordable homestead.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:36 am to turnpiketiger
assuming you don't want to reside in UT (though I would) instead of Cheyenne/Laramie, look at Evanston WY and go to SLC when you need big city stuff - same distance and you're not giving revenue to a communist state like commirado
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 9:38 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:40 am to i am dan
quote:Especially considering the massive fresh water shortage that most western states have been experiencing for years. The reservoirs are low and the Colorado River doesn’t even drain into the ocean.
I'm okay with taking measures to make fracking as environmentally healthy as possible. I see no problem with this.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:42 am to Don Quixote
quote:
instead of Cheyenne/Laramie, look at Evanston WY and go to SLC when you need big city stuff - same distance and you're not giving revenue to a communist state like commirado
Evanston looks a little deserted/rugged compared to Cheyenne. At least Cheyenne has plenty right there in town where you don’t have to leave town for everything. Evanston doesn’t really have anything. At that point you might as well just live in Utah closer to SLC
Popular
Back to top
