Started By
Message

Colorado drillers must recycle frac water starting in 2026 under first-in-the-nation rule

Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:52 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24809 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:52 am
quote:

To reduce the need for fresh fracking water, the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission, on April 8 issued first-in-the-nation regulations requiring 4% of the water from oil and gas production to be recycled starting in 2026 and rising to as much as 35% by 2038.

The amount of water used for fracking — or hydrofracturing — in Colorado is minor, averaging 1.7% of the state’s total water consumption between 2011 and 2020.

“Conservation in the oil and gas industry doesn’t have as big an impact as a similar amount of conservation from the agricultural community,” ECMC Commissioner John Messner told The Colorado Sun. “That’s your biggest water user in the state.”


quote:

The water that comes back out of a well, known as produced water, is a mixture of the water that went down and water that was in the rock formation — often saltwater from prehistoric seas. It is also mixed with oil, mud and sand.

Industry executives say one challenge is the scale of infrastructure that will be needed to cope with recycling produced water. A second problem is the fact that on the Front Range only a fraction of the water that goes down the hole comes back up.

“This makes it difficult to source sufficient volumes of produced water to recycle for the completion of a new well,” Seth Gordon, an engineer for Chevron U.S.A. Inc., said in commission testimony.


quote:

The regulations provide that when recycling begins in 2026, operators only have to use 2% recycled water the first year and then 4% during the next three years. In 2030, the target will be raised to 10%.

The new rules zero in on the Denver-Julesburg or DJ Basin, which consumes 90% of the freshwater used in fracking in Colorado, but recycles less than 1% of its produced water.


quote:

By contrast, the Western Slope’s Piceance Basin uses less than 1% of the freshwater and recycles 92% of its produced water.

There are several reasons there has been so little recycling on the Front Range. One is geology. The amount of water in rock strata varies from basin to basin. In the DJ Basin only 30% to 40% of the fracking water sent down a well comes back up.

“We get about eight barrels of oil for every barrel of water in the DJ,” said Grant Tupper, a business development director for water recycler Select Water Solutions. In Texas’ Permian Basin, he said, there are approximately eight barrels of water for every barrel of oil
.


quote:

In other basins, those large amounts of produced water are waste that must be dealt with. In the Piceance, Colorado’s largest water-producing basin, it has led to an extensive network of pipelines and recycling facilities.

“Not having to deal with that produced water certainly creates better economics for operators (in the DJ) than it does in other areas of the country,” Messner said. As a result, there is little recycling infrastructure on the Front Range.

The DJ Basin has the fewest pipelines for carrying produced water and as a result the basin is more dependent on trucks for hauling produced and recycled water, according to a consortium report.


LINK /

Baws…if only we could build a huge arse pipeline to send that Permian saltwater up to Colorado for them to have more than enough to use.

Gravity would be a son of a bitch. Get to work, you geek engineers.

Might not be long before Texas and New Mexico implement something like this. Especially New Mexico.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 7:55 am
Posted by turnpiketiger
Lone Star State
Member since May 2020
11034 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:54 am to
Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
86430 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Might not be long before Texas and New Mexico implement something like this


With the takeover of the state legislature, it wouldn't surprise me. Abbott would veto it however.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
74929 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?


CO bends over backwards for their ski resorts. I thought I was going to live the rest of my life there, but they just can't stop with stupid laws. Literally was paying 10 cents a goddamn shopping bag for the homeless.
Posted by idontyield
Tunnel Trash
Member since Jun 2022
490 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?


You think they are using tap water to make snow?
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24809 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:18 am to
quote:

With the takeover of the state legislature, it wouldn't surprise me. Abbott would veto it however.


The more seismic activity out there in West TX, it may be tough to avoid. TX Railroad Commission has already curtailed injection rates for permits in some regions, and flat out hasn’t approved any more in others.
Posted by turnpiketiger
Lone Star State
Member since May 2020
11034 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:20 am to
quote:

CO bends over backwards for their ski resorts. I thought I was going to live the rest of my life there, but they just can't stop with stupid laws. Literally was paying 10 cents a goddamn shopping bag for the homeless.


If I were going to live in one of those mountain west states I’d probably go with Utah. You still get skiing and pretty much the same stuff Colorado offers but without the liberal political nonsense.

In fact Utah is almost too conservative. Total polar opposite. I’d even consider northern New Mexico. Taos is spectacular and you’re not far from Denver for big city amenities
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
15988 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Baws…if only we could build a huge arse pipeline to send that Permian saltwater up to Colorado for them to have more than enough to use.

Sometime soon, EPA is going to open up the O&G wastewater ELGs (Subpart E) to expand the allowable discharge of treated produced water nation wide.

Not a matter of if but when.

This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 12:36 pm
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34097 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Utah


Sidebar, but is polygamy really still a thing there?
Posted by FutureCorridor49
US 90
Member since May 2023
538 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

With the takeover of the state legislature, it wouldn't surprise me. Abbott would veto it however.


Wtf are you talking about
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
28172 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:27 am to
I'm okay with taking measures to make fracking as environmentally healthy as possible.

I see no problem with this.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
74929 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:36 am to
My wife and I are relatively sure we'll end up back in Mountain time, so it'll be whatever state we can buy land and doesn't hate guns.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28924 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Do these ski resorts also have to recycle their water?


Posted by turnpiketiger
Lone Star State
Member since May 2020
11034 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Sidebar, but is polygamy really still a thing there?


Not trying to be a prick but please tell me you’re joking. Surely people don’t actually still think that’s a legit legal thing in Utah.

It was a huge ordeal for a long time many years ago then the state of Utah finally put their foot down and the LDS church ended it officially. There are still some small groups who left the LDS Church to form their own branch so they could retain their multiple 12 year old wives but I don’t think that’s technically legal it’s some loophole people are exploiting. By people I mean very very few people.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28924 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Sidebar, but is polygamy really still a thing there?


Are there polygamists here in Utah. Short answer, yes.

But in the 25 years I've lived here, I can count on 1 hand the number of times I've seen them.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34097 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 8:49 am to
No, obviously I realize it wasn't/isn't widespread, but I thought there may be small communities where it still might be a thing.
Posted by turnpiketiger
Lone Star State
Member since May 2020
11034 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:09 am to
quote:

My wife and I are relatively sure we'll end up back in Mountain time, so it'll be whatever state we can buy land and doesn't hate guns.


Wyoming is your best option for affordable land and gun loving.

I always thought southern Wyoming like Laramie or Cheyenne would be nice. I want to be away from super populated areas but still relatively close to a city like Denver. Like if I needed to go to the airport I don’t want to drive 6 hours. Southern Wyoming would mean we could easily take day trips to Denver metro and go back home to our gun loving affordable homestead.
Posted by Don Quixote
Member since May 2023
3318 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:36 am to
assuming you don't want to reside in UT (though I would) instead of Cheyenne/Laramie, look at Evanston WY and go to SLC when you need big city stuff - same distance and you're not giving revenue to a communist state like commirado
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 9:38 am
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35228 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:40 am to
quote:

I'm okay with taking measures to make fracking as environmentally healthy as possible. I see no problem with this.
Especially considering the massive fresh water shortage that most western states have been experiencing for years. The reservoirs are low and the Colorado River doesn’t even drain into the ocean.
Posted by turnpiketiger
Lone Star State
Member since May 2020
11034 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

instead of Cheyenne/Laramie, look at Evanston WY and go to SLC when you need big city stuff - same distance and you're not giving revenue to a communist state like commirado


Evanston looks a little deserted/rugged compared to Cheyenne. At least Cheyenne has plenty right there in town where you don’t have to leave town for everything. Evanston doesn’t really have anything. At that point you might as well just live in Utah closer to SLC
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram