- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Starmer told UK must repeal hate speech laws or lose Trump trade deal
Posted on 4/19/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 1:00 pm
‘Good chance’ of agreement, says JD Vance – but a source close to the administration says his concerns over Britain’s hate speech laws ‘are still a red line’
Sir Keir Starmer must embrace Donald Trump’s agenda by repealing hate speech laws in order to get a trade deal over the line, a Washington source has told The Independent.
The warning came after the US vice-president suggested a UK-US agreement may be close, with the White House “working very hard” on it.
He told UnHerd: “I think there’s a good chance that, yes, we’ll come to a great agreement that’s in the best interest of both countries.”
Mr Vance’s recent speech to the right-wing Heritage Foundation think tank was cited as an example of his views on Western culture and free speech being linked to securing an agreement.
“No free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that,” the Washington source said.
Sir Keir Starmer must embrace Donald Trump’s agenda by repealing hate speech laws in order to get a trade deal over the line, a Washington source has told The Independent.
The warning came after the US vice-president suggested a UK-US agreement may be close, with the White House “working very hard” on it.
He told UnHerd: “I think there’s a good chance that, yes, we’ll come to a great agreement that’s in the best interest of both countries.”
Mr Vance’s recent speech to the right-wing Heritage Foundation think tank was cited as an example of his views on Western culture and free speech being linked to securing an agreement.
“No free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that,” the Washington source said.
9
Posted on 4/19/25 at 1:05 pm to FriendofBaruch
Vance is doing the Lord's work on this issue. Nobody should be imprisoned or have a criminal record for saying something offensive or iconoclastic.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 1:07 pm to FriendofBaruch
Here we go again using access to our markets for political purposes.
This is what got us into this mess.
This is what got us into this mess.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 1:56 pm to Bengalbio
quote:
Here we go again using access to our markets for political purposes.
Is why everything is gay/tranny in the first place. ESG
No one wanted it in the first place, we forced it and need to fix it
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 3:49 pm to FriendofBaruch
"Washington source" lol
Posted on 4/19/25 at 3:52 pm to Bengalbio
quote:
Here we go again using access to our markets for political purposes.
We are trying to save western civilization
Don’t like it then move to China
Posted on 4/19/25 at 3:58 pm to Bengalbio
quote:
Bengalbio
Stalin would label you a useful idiot.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 4:24 pm to Bengalbio
quote:
Here we go again using access to our markets for political purposes.
China makes any business that wants access to their market give them their fricking blueprints.
You don’t think this is standard procedure?
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 4:40 pm to FriendofBaruch
Why do we care about their free speech laws?
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:27 am to mule74
quote:Have you noticed that many of the movements and political environs of Europe migrate here along with Alejandro Mayorkas migrant attacks?
Why do we care about their free speech laws?
UK doing criminalizing of speech is too much too close to us.
Hell I still want the Dutch farmers to defeat the WEF disease under which Europe is plagued
The totalitarian aspects of the European criminals known as WEF should be stopped by all earthlings - it is that important
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:30 am to Bengalbio
quote:
Here we go again using access to our markets for political purposes.
Just what this board needs is another groomer that wants to silence the enemy.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:33 am to FriendofBaruch
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:35 am to FriendofBaruch
I don’t get it.
WTF does speech laws have to do with a trade agreement?
WTF does speech laws have to do with a trade agreement?
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:37 am to Bengalbio
quote:
This is what got us into this mess
What mess???
Shaking up our trading partners and realigning trade and geopolitical issues to be more advantageous to America???
That's not a mess, that's change for the better.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:42 am to AGGIES
quote:
I don’t get it.
WTF does speech laws have to do with a trade agreement?
You wouldn't get it.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:43 am to AGGIES
quote:
I don’t get it.
WTF does speech laws have to do with a trade agreement?
Trump and Bessent have stated repeatedly that geopolitical issues would be part of the trade negotiations. I don't know if you voted for Trump, but I did and trust him to do what he promised.
America First. As far as how he accomplishes this, that's on Trump.
If I thought I could do better, I would've ran for president. I don't, so I voted for the person I believed could.
If a person voted for Trump, they should let the man do his job. If it doesn't work out, then we can bitch.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:49 am to FriendofBaruch
Our NATO membership should hinge of freedoms as well.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:50 am to FriendofBaruch
A "source close to the administration says"... yeah, you can usually throw this garbage out right here... No trade deal is going to be affected by this bullshite...
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:52 am to AGGIES
quote:
I don’t get it.
WTF does speech laws have to do with a trade agreement?
Well, if you don't get it, then nobody is going to be able to explain it to you because it's self explanatory and in the simplest of terms.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 10:54 am to SoWhat
quote:
NATO membership should hinge of freedoms as well.
Yes sir. If not, then wtf are we doing?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News