- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Injunctions issued by District Courts under each POTUS since W
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:51 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:51 am
Straight from liberal-leaning ChatGPT which clearly sees a trend
11
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:59 am to stout
Past statistics should not be used as proof and is not reflective in jurisdictional matters".
~SFP
~SFP
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:00 am to stout
Seems "lawfarish" to me. What say you SFP?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:02 am to stout
These numbers also reflect the disregard by the executive branch of the proper scope and limits of executive power.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:02 am to stout
I wonder if Eurocat will post in this thread? Doubt it.
Also, funny how non-lawyers recognize what lawfare is, but that idiot from Lake Charles is clueless (or simply lying, which is actually the case).
Also, funny how non-lawyers recognize what lawfare is, but that idiot from Lake Charles is clueless (or simply lying, which is actually the case).
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:02 am to TBoy
You cannot be serious.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:03 am to stout
The entire system has been gamed to have a left-wing bent.
It is only coincidental that it being that way increases lawyer fees.
It is only coincidental that it being that way increases lawyer fees.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:04 am to TBoy
quote:
These numbers also reflect the disregard by the executive branch of the proper scope and limits of executive power.
Does the POTUS have the right to direct ICE to remove Venezuelan gangs who are here illegally?
Asking since that is the flavor of the week you Dems are using to say that the POTUS is overstepping the limits of the executive branch
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:05 am to TBoy
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:09 am to TigerMyth36
TBOY seems retarded...he has to be...
Any human with a functioning brain can see the discrepancy in the rate of injunctions.
DEMS don't care...I'd encourage my fellow humans with brains to not get too stressed out.
It's been this way for decades...DEMS ARE ALL RETARDED.
Any human with a functioning brain can see the discrepancy in the rate of injunctions.
DEMS don't care...I'd encourage my fellow humans with brains to not get too stressed out.
It's been this way for decades...DEMS ARE ALL RETARDED.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:17 am to stout
quote:
Does the POTUS have the right to direct ICE to remove Venezuelan gangs who are here illegally?
Of course it does. As you know (but are apparently programed to omit from your public statements) the issue is not removal and deportation. The issue is using, for the first time, the 1798 Alien Exclusion Act. The Trump administration could have deported the gang members using the ordinary law, but that would have requires a likely very short deportation hearing where the government would have had to show that the deportees are not on legal status. Instead, Trump (unlike any other president in history) claimed that due process is suspended under a 1798 law that applies during time of war. We are not at war.
The court hearings and temporary injunction for such an action were a certainty. The Trump administration knows that we are not at war. The Trump administration knows (as do you) that due process is not suspended. We are not at war. Special war powers are not available. The ordinary law is not suspended.
That's the issue, and you know it. But please, continue pretending that you don't.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:19 am to stout
Lawfare is real
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:25 am to TBoy
quote:You should be evicted. I’m sure there will be plenty support in this case.
These numbers also reflect the disregard by the executive branch of the proper scope and limits of executive power.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:26 am to stout
Obviously is the judicial branch stepping way outside of their bounds... These judges need to have consequences for their actions...
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:28 am to TBoy
So you're saying using an existing law as precidence is illegal ... why?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:29 am to hogcard1964
quote:
Past statistics should not be used as proof and is not reflective in jurisdictional matters". The Judge is judging by merits only and does not have a daughter that gets pay days from illegal drug lords. He was a FISA court Judge and has an impeccable, spotless bio. He works at homeless missions on the weekends.
~SFP-Esquire
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:30 am to Warboo
quote:
Seems "lawfarish" to me. What say you SFP?
You'd have to get into subjective evaluation of each EO and how norm-defying or presumed illegal and compare to the injunctions.
The subjective nature of the initial evaluation would never lead to any consensus one way or the other.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 9:31 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You forgot to sign off on the latest crock of shite.
The subjective nature of the initial valuation would never lead to any consensus one way or the other. SFP-Esquire
Do another one. So I can quote you twice. Make it bigly big with bigly words.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:36 am to stout
OMB is a felon and rapist. He is lawless thus the issues with the legal system.
- VOR
- VOR
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:36 am to TBoy
quote:
We are not at war.
We had an "insurrection" without firearms,
It seems to be the case that we are also having a "war" without firearms.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News