- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge Boasberg, ordered Trump DOJ provide the court with more info in writing by Noon
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:49 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:49 am
quote:Can the esteemed poli board lawyers, or anyone--Please provide in writing how is it that the "ACLU "----or "Democracy Forward," was elected to run foreign and or domestic policy via a corrupt DC Judge?
Judge Boasberg, in response, ordered the Justice Department to provide the court with more information in writing by Tuesday at noon.
In granting the emergency order Saturday Boasberg sided with the plaintiffs – Democracy Forward and the ACLU – who had argued that the deportations would likely pose imminent and "irreparable" harm to the migrants under the time proposed.
Judge Boasberg also ordered the Trump administration Saturday to immediately halt any planned deportations, and to notify their clients that "any plane containing these folks that is going to take off or is in the air needs to be returned to the United States," he said.
But the decision apparently came too late to stop a plane filled with more than 200 migrants who were deported to El Salvador.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News in an interview that a plane carrying hundreds of migrants, including more than 130 persons removed under the Alien Enemies Act, had already "left U.S. airspace" by the time the order was handed down.
She also suggested the order itself was not "lawful" and noted the Trump administration's intent to appeal.
In response, the ACLU asked the court to order the government to submit declarations, under oath, that the planes had indeed taken off after the court's order.
"Whether or not the planes had cleared U.S. territory, the U.S. retained custody at least until the planes landed and the individuals were turned over to foreign governments," the ACLU said in their filing.
Judge Boasberg, an Obama appointee, at times appeared slightly incredulous that the Trump administration chose to move forward with the deportation of hundreds of migrants to El Salvador, pressing lawyers for the Justice Department over whether they believed there were better options than to comply with the decision he handed down Saturday.
"Isn’t then the better course, to return the planes to the United States and figure out what to do, than to say, ‘We don’t care, we’ll do what we want?'" he asked.
LINK
TIA. Please include the history of "Democracy Forward" and who runs them.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 7:56 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:50 am to cajunangelle
Still waiting for the judge to prove he has standing!
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:53 am to cajunangelle
Hank and SFP support gang importation. Nothing more, nothing less
They will try to look smart and talk case law, but this is all that it boils down to. Its sad
They will try to look smart and talk case law, but this is all that it boils down to. Its sad
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:54 am to dakarx
I want to know if Judge Boasberg automatically signed off on whatever the ACLU and Democracy Forward requested in their filing without question?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:55 am to DawgCountry
quote:
Hank and SFP support gang importation.
We need addresses, Thanks in advance. T. Homan, Border Czar
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:55 am to cajunangelle
Just hand him a document calling for him to recuse himself from this case. With documentation of his daughters agency.
Force his involvement into question, and have it moved up to whatever is his appeals process for him to stay on.
Force his involvement into question, and have it moved up to whatever is his appeals process for him to stay on.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:57 am to cajunangelle
quote:
the deportations would likely pose imminent and "irreparable" harm to the migrants
Let's hope so.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:00 am to LSUROXS
Democracy Forward will ask you for money if you go to their web site.
They are a non-profit. With the breaking news headline on their site that they won in playing President.
A non-profit advertising that they DISRUPT https://democracyforward.org/about/
They are a non-profit. With the breaking news headline on their site that they won in playing President.
A non-profit advertising that they DISRUPT https://democracyforward.org/about/
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 8:03 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:03 am to cajunangelle
This is all about reasons for impeachment
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:09 am to Kolbysfan
An impeachment would fail. The big question is Chief Justice Roberts and this Judge.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:13 am to cajunangelle
Boasberg has done a good job at identifying himself as an enemy of the state
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:16 am to dakarx
quote:
Still waiting for the judge to prove he has standing!
The judge or parties?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:16 am to DawgCountry
quote:
Hank and SFP support gang importation. Nothing more, nothing less
No. I support the Constitution and its limitations on government action and following the rule of law.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:20 am to Kolbysfan
It’s part of their lawfare coup. These judges are more dangerous than any foreign adversary.
Trump needs to get more aggressive with them. They should be under investigation, audited, every dirty trick in the book is valid to get rid of these swamp creatures
Trump needs to get more aggressive with them. They should be under investigation, audited, every dirty trick in the book is valid to get rid of these swamp creatures
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:20 am to SlowFlowPro
Is 'Democracy Forward' and the 'ACLU 'running geopolitics and national security-a job clearly given to the CIC- Constitutional?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. I support the Constitution and its limitations on government action and following the rule of law.

Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:21 am to SlowFlowPro
thanks for proving my point. nice work 

Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:22 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Is 'Democracy Forward' and the 'ACLU 'running geopolitics and national security-a job clearly given to the CIC- Constitutional?
They aren't "running geopolitics and national security"
They're filing lawsuits alleging the admin didn't follow the law/Constitution. Due to the novel applications of statutory law by the admin, and the admin possibly ignoring court orders, we're in pretty new territory here.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:23 am to DawgCountry
quote:
thanks for proving my point.
No. You're just acting irrationally. I explained this in the sister thread
quote:
When courts are discussing the limits of governmental power, the underlying case/merits often include bad people. That's why the merits are irrelevant to the legal discussion unfolding (despite this being impossible for certain people to separate due to emotions and partisan-based programming).
If you support Constitutional law and restricting the power of government, you're going to end up relying on cases with very bad people.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 8:24 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:23 am to dakarx
quote:
Still waiting for the judge to prove he has standing!
Jurisdiction.
Parties have to show standing.
Courts must have jurisdiction.
Popular
Back to top
