Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Are today's HVAC units bigger to the same size units of the past?

Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:08 pm
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49190 posts
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:08 pm
My HVAC contractor told me that a 4 ton today is almost equivalent to a 5 ton from 10-15 years ago, a 3 ton is equivalent to a 4 ton from years ago, and so on.

Is there any truth to this? I can't find any real info on the internet to back this up. Having issues right now with a system that's less than a year old and I'm thinking they installed the wrong sized unit without sizing my house properly.
Posted by tdme
Member since Jan 2022
278 posts
Posted on 2/26/25 at 4:08 pm to
Do you larger in physical size or in their ability to cool down the inside of your house?


I don't have exact measurements, but it is true the the new units are larger in physical size.
I have two units. One is an older 2 ton unit and a new 2.5 ton unit. The new 2.5 ton is much bigger than the old 2 ton unit.

The new units are larger to help with the higher efficiency requirements.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 4:10 pm
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49190 posts
Posted on 2/26/25 at 5:37 pm to
I mean in the ability to cool.

Like a home that required a 4 ton unit before would be able to go with a 3 or 3.5 ton now.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
60587 posts
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:06 pm to
No….a “ton” of cooling capacity is defined as a unit that can remove 12,000 btu/per hour from the structure. I don’t believe this definition has changed.

Units have absolutely become more effecient, however rating is the same as it has always been.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49190 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 6:46 am to
Ok so either I misunderstood what he was saying or he’s full of shite.
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
17128 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

My HVAC contractor told me that a 4 ton today is almost equivalent to a 5 ton from 10-15 years ago, a 3 ton is equivalent to a 4 ton from years ago, and so on.


He was likely talking about how efficient they are…meaning how much electricity they use. Not about how much cooling capacity they have. As another poster stated above, a ton of cooling capacity is a ton of cooling capacity, period.
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
61888 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

I'm thinking they installed the wrong sized unit without sizing my house properly.


How old is the house? How many sq ft?
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
42600 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 7:15 am to
quote:

My HVAC contractor told me that a 4 ton today is almost equivalent to a 5 ton from 10-15 years ago
A ton of cooling capacity is still a ton of cooling capacity. To my knowledge, not a whole lot has changed in the last 10-15 years. Units may have gotten slightly more efficient, but I am not sure about that.

quote:

Having issues right now with a system that's less than a year old and I'm thinking they installed the wrong sized unit without sizing my house properly.



What issues are you having?

Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
23393 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 7:15 am to
quote:

He was likely talking about how efficient they are…


Which realistically means they could potentially cool more space right? If a new unit is 21 seer and an old unit is 14 seer, would the new unit technically not be able to cool more space? It could cool the same space more efficiently, sure. But does that also not mean it could cool a larger space with the same efficiency?

In my unprofessional observation, a lot of new units have larger more powerful blowers to move the air more efficiently. More air in less time, equates to some improved efficiency. This isn’t always more efficient, as units on the lower end of the size needed then run less often and therefore less humidity is removed. Therefore you have to actually change the blower settings to run the unit more often than is optimal to remove the heat in order to remove enough moisture.
This post was edited on 2/28/25 at 7:19 am
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
12194 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 9:11 am to
quote:

He was likely talking about how efficient they are…


Agreed if this is what he’s referencing. Replaced an R22 reciprocating compressor unit a new R410 scroll compressor unit (Rheem 14 seer) and it pulls 1/2 the current of the old one. The old one regularly pulled around 15-18A depending on temperature outside. The new one usually stays below 10A but typically runs around 8.5A. Amazing leap in efficiency.

I also agree with a previous poster who said new units are larger. I imagine the newer ones have a lot more surface area on the coils to transfer heat better.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
51354 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Ok so either I misunderstood what he was saying or he’s full of shite.


It is possible he is referring to houses are much tighter than previous builds, which often leads to people buying too large of an HVAC compared to the past. The old rule of a 1 ton per 500sqFT does not really hold up anymore in a tightly build house.
Posted by White Bear
AT WORK
Member since Jul 2014
17255 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 10:22 am to
If hvac prices keep climbing you should be able to live in the hvac system before long.
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
17128 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Which realistically means they could potentially cool more space right? If a new unit is 21 seer and an old unit is 14 seer, would the new unit technically not be able to cool more space?


Nope. SEER rating measures how much electricity is used while the unit is running, not how much cooling capacity the unit has while it’s running.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram