- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Was Reuters paid millions of dollars by US gov for “large scale social deception"?
Posted on 2/12/25 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 2/12/25 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 2/12/25 at 10:54 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
total panic mode!


Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:11 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Screwed by our own government...let me see if I can find my "shocked face"
And oh, if you have to deceive people you're just selling bullshite.
And oh, if you have to deceive people you're just selling bullshite.
This post was edited on 2/12/25 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:12 pm to Delusional
Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:12 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
They would say it was a defense against large scale social deception.
We know what happened. Just lies upon lies.
We know what happened. Just lies upon lies.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:12 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:16 pm to the808bass
Would love to hear the rationale behind paying a news org for that
Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:18 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Our tax dollars funded the global media response to the Covid virus, that our tax dollars paid to produce.
Fauci was doing Nazi level stuff, and he is the ultimate government employee “double dipper”. Meaning he had multiple income sources besides his government salary that would not be present without his position in government.
Your US Congress held real jobs, way back in the day. DC was not a permanent thing.
Fauci was doing Nazi level stuff, and he is the ultimate government employee “double dipper”. Meaning he had multiple income sources besides his government salary that would not be present without his position in government.
Your US Congress held real jobs, way back in the day. DC was not a permanent thing.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:20 pm to Delusional
Posted on 2/13/25 at 3:38 am to LSUFAITHFUL2
2018 huh.
so faggiehank, vor and decatur can't even spin this as 'i'm sure this was fighting against covid misinformation'.
what happened in 2018?
oh yeah, dems took control of congress.
so faggiehank, vor and decatur can't even spin this as 'i'm sure this was fighting against covid misinformation'.
what happened in 2018?
oh yeah, dems took control of congress.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 3:48 am to LSUFAITHFUL2
quote:
Straight from US Govt Spending database
Wonder what the executive compensation portion was all about. All of the 5 officers got roughly 500k each.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 3:52 am to idlewatcher
quote:bonuses for a job WELL DONE
Wonder what the executive compensation portion was all about. All of the 5 officers got roughly 500k each.

Posted on 2/13/25 at 3:56 am to LSUFAITHFUL2
quote:
Straight from US Govt Spending database
quote:
DARPA is soliciting innovative research proposals in the area of automated defense against social engineering attacks.
I'm not saying they're innocent, but immediately jumping to assume this is nefarious is probably foolish.
At the same time, have to wonder why Reuters is involved in this process.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 3:59 am to jmcwhrter
quote:you mean like shutting down discussion of covid starting in a lab or ivermectin being effective at treating covid?
DARPA is soliciting innovative research proposals in the area of automated defense against social engineering attacks.
kinda like that?
interesting this took place 2 years before COVID

This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 3:59 am
Posted on 2/13/25 at 4:02 am to CAD703X
quote:
you mean like shutting down discussion of covid starting in a lab or ivermectin being effective at treating covid?
kinda like that?
interesting this took place 2 years before COVID
No argument here.. Just wondering why Reuters?
Posted on 2/13/25 at 4:45 am to jmcwhrter
quote:
'm not saying they're innocent, but immediately jumping to assume this is nefarious is probably foolish. At the same time, have to wonder why Reuters is involved in this process.
Did you have some mocktails or something?
Money. That’s why Reuters is involved, they want money.
It’s a bunch of beggars out there.
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 4:46 am
Posted on 2/13/25 at 4:51 am to jmcwhrter
quote:
No argument here.. Just wondering why Reuters?
You can't just pocket $10,000,000.00 you have to "wash" it some first.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:01 am to DMAN1968
Where are the Congressional hearings?
Popular
Back to top
