- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Spring baseball cumulative stats
Posted on 2/3/25 at 10:55 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 10:55 am
I compiled these from Scuba's recaps. Excuse me if there are slight mistakes, but overall gives us a good idea of how everyone's doing.
Batters sorted by OPS:
Pitchers sorted by WHIP:
Thoughts:
- Curiel is living up to the hype. He looks like he's gonna be a pain for opposing pitchers during his time here.
- Reaves has had a nice spring
- Priester
- Braswell needs to pick it up, not too worried about him though.
- Anderson appears to be that dude, building off a great fall
- Eyanson
- Mayers shows off his great stuff at times but crumbles when things start going badly (Hurd anyone?). Let's see if the staff can take advantage of the stuff he has.
Batters sorted by OPS:
Pitchers sorted by WHIP:
Thoughts:
- Curiel is living up to the hype. He looks like he's gonna be a pain for opposing pitchers during his time here.
- Reaves has had a nice spring
- Priester
- Braswell needs to pick it up, not too worried about him though.
- Anderson appears to be that dude, building off a great fall
- Eyanson
- Mayers shows off his great stuff at times but crumbles when things start going badly (Hurd anyone?). Let's see if the staff can take advantage of the stuff he has.
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 11:28 am
11
Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:14 am to bradygolf98
What did we do before OPS?
take me back
take me back
Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:15 am to bradygolf98
Good stuff.
Check your ERA formula. It is off.
Check your ERA formula. It is off.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:16 am to jodyHighroller
To be honest, the only reason it's sorted by OPS is because it was the furthest right column and was easiest to sort it that way 
After putting all the stats together I was too lazy to move the columns around because I liked the order.
After putting all the stats together I was too lazy to move the columns around because I liked the order. Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:19 am to BayTiger13
Thanks, forgot to multiply by 9. That might help.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:22 am to bradygolf98
Not trying to be the math nazi here but it is technically still slightly off being you are using the innings pitched in decimal form. 5.2 IP is not the same as
5 2/3 IP. Either have to use fraction form for the IP or use .333333 for 1/3 and .666666666 for 2/3 IP.
I do like the batters sorted by OPS. My opinion it is the most important stat of a hitter.
5 2/3 IP. Either have to use fraction form for the IP or use .333333 for 1/3 and .666666666 for 2/3 IP.
I do like the batters sorted by OPS. My opinion it is the most important stat of a hitter.
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 11:23 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:46 am to jodyHighroller
OPS is much more representative and effective measure
Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:55 am to bradygolf98
Reaves has looked really good, he's challenging for the top LHH DH spot and even 1st team 2B with Dickinson struggling. Started with the 1s yesterday.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 11:56 am to bradygolf98
Thank you sir
Posted on 2/3/25 at 12:11 pm to North Dallas Tiger
looks like Beck will definitely get some time on the mound and as a two way player
Posted on 2/3/25 at 12:27 pm to bradygolf98
Thank you for doing this. Were the innings that began with a runner on base factored in to the ERA?
Posted on 2/3/25 at 12:52 pm to Gnash
I didn't go to all of the games and just went off Scuba's recaps so I don't know exactly what innings had runners starting on base.
In the MLB with the "ghost runners" they do not count that runner in the pitchers ERA. If I had to guess, Scuba did not count them into his earned runs, but he would have to confirm.
In the MLB with the "ghost runners" they do not count that runner in the pitchers ERA. If I had to guess, Scuba did not count them into his earned runs, but he would have to confirm.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:27 pm to Gnash
I ignore the runners on base to start an inning as much as possible. Example: Two runners on and batter grounds out, advancing the runners. I score as a fielder's choice and an out for the batter. Example two: two runners on and the batter flies out, advancing the runners. I score the batter flies out, no sacf. I reaize this skews the stats but it is the best way I have found to be consistant with my scoring I wish Coach Johnson would play the scrimmages more like a real game than creating so many situations but, he has his reasons and I'm not going to suggest he changes anything.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:51 pm to bradygolf98
Have really high hopes for Anderson and Eyanson
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:09 pm to bradygolf98
I can already see Cowan throwing 6 scoreless in an SECT game at 1am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 6:29 pm to bradygolf98
Nice job compiling...you beat BayTiger to the punch.
Mayers is very much like Hurd. This past weekend he was lights out in his first inning. Then he got the first two outs of the next inning if I recall correctly and then walked 3 consecutive batters after losing the zone.
Hurd is an excellent comparison for Mayers. Stuff is so good he can load the bases and find a way out of it, but he will make you pull your hair out. He's just not consistently around the zone.
Mayers is very much like Hurd. This past weekend he was lights out in his first inning. Then he got the first two outs of the next inning if I recall correctly and then walked 3 consecutive batters after losing the zone.
Hurd is an excellent comparison for Mayers. Stuff is so good he can load the bases and find a way out of it, but he will make you pull your hair out. He's just not consistently around the zone.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 6:38 pm to bradygolf98
Curiel will go down as a top 10 Tiger great…and that’s saying a lot
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:10 pm to bradygolf98
What’s up with Shores? I know he has ground to makeup following tj, but damn thought we’d see a little more than his spring performance
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:17 pm to bradygolf98
Also want to point out that Scuba accidentally left off this past weekend's outing for Dorsey. At least it wasn't there initially. So if Scuba didn't go back and add it then Dorsey's numbers aren't accurate.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:28 pm to Tjcajun
quote:
What’s up with Shores? I know he has ground to makeup following tj, but damn thought we’d see a little more than his spring performance
fun to look at but there is no worthwhile sample size to draw from here
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News