Started By
Message
locked post

Any news of LSU Coaching changes?

Posted on 12/26/24 at 10:22 am
Posted by TigerPlate
North Dallas
Member since Dec 2023
498 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 10:22 am
Any word on LSU coaching changes? Seems like this time of year there are assistant coaches moving on to coordinator positions or head coach positions. Curious if that is a possibility or are we maintaining the status quo.
Guessing the OC position is the one that might have some possible movement.
Posted by iamandykeim
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
3660 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 10:27 am to
BK usually doesn't do anything regarding staffing until mid-January
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115573 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 10:28 am to
TE coach position is open but not a whole lotta smoke around it.

Pretty quiet coaching changes season this year in general. Think the NIL atmosphere has made schools reevaluate the recent tradition of “pay for the best coaches and get the best roster”

Paying 2 mil to poach a high valued assistant is 2 mil you could just put towards your roster

Could eat these words but I think we’re gonna have a lot less of an active coaching carousel in this era as it currently is constructed
Posted by Holy Bull
Member since Dec 2024
136 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 12:51 pm to
Who’s the new OC gonna be?
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
25593 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Who’s the new OC gonna be?



Did we fire/demote our current OC?
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34068 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Could eat these words but I think we’re gonna have a lot less of an active coaching carousel in this era as it currently is constructed


I agree. You are already seeing some coaches (including BK) "donate" some of their salary back to the school/athletic dept which is kind of a end-around to make sure there are enough funds to pay an ever increasing NIL bill.

Schools are already hitting up donors for ever increasing amounts to fund rosters. Those are the same people who (in part) fund the coaching salaries. Their willingness to continue to give and give might run a little drive if you are asking them to pay more and more for players and ALSO fund buyouts (for firing coaches) and huge amounts to pay for new coaches. The NFL, with its billions in revenue and structured revenue sharing, salary cap, etc, only has 9 HCs who currently make more than $9M annually. College football has 9 as well, but with less annual revenues and no limit on what the players can be paid.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55608 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 5:53 pm to
Billy Gonzales
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
66564 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Who’s the new OC gonna be?


I think we stick with Sloan
Posted by TigerPlate
North Dallas
Member since Dec 2023
498 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 7:53 am to
thanks you are right. I had forgotten about the timing in all this.
Seems like I remember him sitting down with the whole staff and evaluating and grading all of them
Posted by Magnus
San Diego
Member since Sep 2019
1931 posts
Posted on 12/30/24 at 3:59 pm to
really gonna stick with sloan? all the new weapons coming in i'm worried he'll be clueless again
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
40111 posts
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Think the NIL atmosphere has made schools reevaluate the recent tradition of “pay for the best coaches and get the best roster”

Paying 2 mil to poach a high valued assistant is 2 mil you could just put towards your roster

Could eat these words but I think we’re gonna have a lot less of an active coaching carousel in this era as it currently is constructed


The people that coaches hire to get them more money are skilled professionals.

The people that players hire to get them NIL deals are ungifted amateurs.

If anything, the current state of NIL will make coaching more cutthroat.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115573 posts
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

If anything, the current state of NIL will make coaching more cutthroat.


Not sure what you’re defining as cutthroat here but I’m simply making a guess based on the changing economics in the sport

Players previously were a very static and renewable resource that was heavily impacted by location, program history and other predetermined factors, with the biggest impact to improving the roster was through making direct investment into the coaching staffs. Getting that signature on signing day typically meant you had that player for atleast 3 seasons unless you decided otherwise to kick them off. And if they did transfer, it was off to FCS or JUCO to never be heard from again

Naturally the market incentivizes the schools (boasters and decision makers at each college) to seek out having the top of the line in all of those predetermined categories AND coaching staffs. This would then increase the overall appeal to recruits overall and eventually and ideally you get a championship level team. SEC had money to burn so it was a space race to the best facilities, the best perks, and most of all the best coaches. Coaches thus had all the leverage in the world to flirt with every job to get an ever increasing pay raise year over year


With the unrestricted movement of the portal, players are allowed to reset to find their highest market bidder each year. So the equation is much more direct and the price tag is listed front and center. Teams simply buy the roster they can afford each season with a little bit of high school recruiting thrown in for old times sake. So the incentives have changed. Now sure the best DC in the country would be a good pitch for recruiting, but is it beating the value of the dollars and cents that another team is writing for those players that that same buyout/high salary money could be going to?

But a mid major P5 or even G5 school may be find that high spend on assistants much more fruitful because of the development and growth of talent they can offer for rosters that would likely have less turnover outside of the players moving up each year

Again I’m just pissing in the wind making a guess based on the ever changing economics and dynamics of the sport. Could certainly still just be more money still spent on coaching as well, and to be clear I am not saying coaches will go broke. I just think it might level out more like the high school level where there’s a lower ceiling but the resources provided in NIL and elsewhere are the drivers of where the top coaches go.


We’ve already seen top coaches basically get leveraged into giving back large lump sums of their huge contracts to add to NIL. I may be wrong about my guess above, but it’s still clear the market dynamics have shifted dramatically for coaches with the current environment
This post was edited on 12/30/24 at 4:49 pm
Posted by Prosecuted Collins
The Farm
Member since Sep 2003
7205 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:29 pm to
Excellent, well thought out post.
Posted by uscpuke
Member since Jan 2004
6195 posts
Posted on 1/4/25 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Any news of LSU Coaching changes?
unfortunately looking like BK is going to be retained.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram