- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Jackson Arnold vs Michael Van Buren
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:51 am
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:51 am
I just realized something pretty wild. Jackson Arnold supposedly is getting something like $2.5-3M from Auburn for 1 year. I have no clue what LSU is giving MVB, but I’d guess it’s way below that. Their 2024 numbers are very similar:
Arnold:
10 Games
154/246 (62.6%)
1865 Total Yards
16 Total TDs
3 INTs
MVB:
10 Games
140/256 (54.7%)
1874 Total Yards
16 Total TDs
7 INTs
Did we get a complete steal?
ETA: I love that TN Tygah completed hijacked this thread
Arnold:
10 Games
154/246 (62.6%)
1865 Total Yards
16 Total TDs
3 INTs
MVB:
10 Games
140/256 (54.7%)
1874 Total Yards
16 Total TDs
7 INTs
Did we get a complete steal?
ETA: I love that TN Tygah completed hijacked this thread
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:53 am to iamandykeim
quote:
Michael Van Buren
Already said "AS OF TODAY" he will be the starter after Nuss leaves.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:54 am to iamandykeim
Games, Yards and TDs are similar. Arnold was much better in comp % and Ints, if you're just comparing numbers on paper.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:56 am to Lee Chatelain
quote:
Already said "AS OF TODAY" he will be the starter after Nuss leaves.
Why are people convinced that Nuss is guaranteed the starting job? He is not a great QB and refused to fix any issues over the season, and there were several that could’ve been implemented in a week.
By the end of the season he was still throwing the ball right into the opposing team’s hands for no reason.
And despite all the hate he got for not running the ball he never did it until a few times in the OU game. If he doesn’t approve he is not guaranteed shite. Especially if this Van Buren kid comes in with something to prove and works his arse off.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:56 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:Arnold is also a full year older
Arnold was much better in comp % and Ints, if you're just comparing numbers on paper.
okay apparently this isn't true my B
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 11:30 am
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:57 am to TN Tygah
quote:jesus christ
Why are people convinced that Nuss is guaranteed the starting job?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:59 am to TN Tygah
quote:
Why are people convinced that Nuss is guaranteed the starting job?
Maybe because in his first year as a starter he had one of the best seasons in school history?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:00 am to iamandykeim
That guy transferred to auburn? So Oklahoma lost Dillon Gabriel to Oregon because they wanted Arnold and they ended up with neither and a shite season
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:00 am to iamandykeim
quote:
Arnold is also a full year older
They’re actually the same age
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:01 am to TN Tygah
quote:
Why are people convinced that Nuss is guaranteed the starting job?
Because he is, and should be. There is no one on the roster, including Van Buren that should start over Nuss next year.
quote:
By the end of the season he was still throwing the ball right into the opposing team’s hands for no reason.
Vandy: 28/37, 332 yds, 1 TD, 0 Int
OU: 22/31, 277 yds, 3 TD, 0 Int
WTF are you talking about?
quote:
If he doesn’t approve he is not guaranteed shite.
Huh?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:01 am to TN Tygah
quote:
Why are people convinced that Nuss is guaranteed the starting job?
The only way Nuss is not QB1 in week 1 is because he is sick, injured, or dead. You're setting yourself up for a huge disappointment if you think there will be a legitimate QB competition in the offseason. The only competition will be between Van Buren and Hurley for the backup spot.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:08 am to TigerGrad03
quote:Improve. He meant "improve". Not "approve".
Huh?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:11 am to TN Tygah
quote:
By the end of the season he was still throwing the ball right into the opposing team’s hands for no reason.
What is I told you that Van Buren did this at a higher rate than Nuss? What f I also told you that Van Buren had 3 interceptions in his last 3 games and Nuss had 0 interceptions in his last 3 games?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:13 am to iamandykeim
quote:
Arnold is also a full year older
OP should read "Their age-adjusted stats are very similar."
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:15 am to Yeti_Chaser
Oklahoma landed the #1 QB in the portal, John Mateer.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:31 am to TN Tygah
quote:
Why are people convinced that Nuss is guaranteed the starting job? He is not a great QB and refused to fix any issues over the season, and there were several that could’ve been implemented in a week.
Vegas just came out with odds giving him having a legitimate shot winning the Heisman trophy next year and you question why he's the starter?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:35 am to sunnydaze
quote:
They’re actually the same age
He might have meant college experience.
Van Buren in his first year..
Arnold in his second year.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:38 am to TN Tygah
quote:
Why are people convinced that Nuss is guaranteed the starting job? H
quote:
TN Tygah

Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:38 am to TN Tygah
This proves that being an idiot is terminal.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:51 am to LSBoosie
quote:
What is I told you that Van Buren did this at a higher rate than Nuss? What f I also told you that Van Buren had 3 interceptions in his last 3 games and Nuss had 0 interceptions in his last 3 games?
Another tidbit is that Van Buren had 7 INTs on the year as a true freshman with likely a less talented support cast around him.
Popular
Back to top

8





