Started By
Message
locked post

Root Cause Investigation - O Line

Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:27 pm
Posted by TooSober
AA Meeting
Member since Oct 2015
627 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:27 pm
In business or industry, when something does not go as planned, we do a root cause investigation. Surely some type of forensic study would be done to determine what happened to the expectation, partially fed to us by the coaches, that the O_line would be dominate this year.

Are experts (Pro O-line coaches, for example) brought in to critique coaching, techniques, scheme, etc??? What other deep dives would be done, and who would lead these? Please tell me something.





Posted by ImayGoLesMiles
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Feb 2015
13290 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

dominate


Dominant
Posted by The Real Keyser Soze
Downtown BR
Member since Jun 2009
1099 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:30 pm to
I like this idea but I think we'd find out that it's a combination of these factors as well as a few other things like RB patience, waiting for holes to open, etc.. Pass blocking seemed good for the most part, except when Nuss would start running backwards when pressure arrived.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
33977 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:35 pm to
The Center struggled and the approach to the running game was poor and predictable. Nussmeier was unwilling to be a factor in the running game approach, which helped make it easy to defend. Later in the season the interior pass-pro struggled because you had a below-average center playing along side a RS Freshmen LG making his first starts.

There's your root cause. No experts or expensive consultants needed. It's not rocket science. It's football.
Posted by TooSober
AA Meeting
Member since Oct 2015
627 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:41 pm to
As found in the Gospels... Blessed be the Spell Checkers, for they shall inherit the English Class
Posted by DamnStrong
NOLA Til I Die!
Member since Aug 2008
4902 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

As found in the Gospels... Blessed be the Spell Checkers, for they shall inherit the English Class

The guy that invented auto-correct just died.
May he rust in piss
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
10881 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:46 pm to
It'll be interesting to see what the pros think. If all 4 our our guys get drafted, you have to assume coaches and offense were the problem.
Posted by jtran1988
Corndog U
Member since Oct 2008
5627 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:46 pm to
There was a pass play where the center or guard blatantly allows a defender to blitz through to get to Nuss. Someone made a .gif of it.

That is your Root Cause Analysis.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 2:47 pm
Posted by TooSober
AA Meeting
Member since Oct 2015
627 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:47 pm to
Someone posted a run play of TDP from when he set the record in the single game rushing record in the 2021 Florida game... The blocking in that play was nothing like what I saw this year.... Saying "oh we had a bad center, there's your answer" does not cut it in the run game. For most of the year we had what we expected to be superior, experienced players. There are many reasons why we could not run from Game 1 on and no stone should be left unturned to find them.
Posted by TooSober
AA Meeting
Member since Oct 2015
627 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 2:49 pm to
Thread is on run game blocking... try to focus.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20064 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

The Center struggled and the approach to the running game was poor and predictable . . . There's your root cause. No experts or expensive consultants needed. It's not rocket science. It's football.


Why did the center struggle? Why was the approach poor and predictable? We have to ask our 5 whys.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22535 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Surely some type of forensic study would be done to determine what happened to the expectation


It was several factors mostly on the interior offensive line play. Some of it was poor technique & fundamentals. Guys not firing off the ball at the snap, bad footwork, poor hand placement at times, lineman being "too tall" while trying to make driving blocks.

Predictable run formations & personnel groupings tipped the defense off to it being a run play & to which gap.

Inexperience. Players like DJ Chester & Paul Mubenga simply lacked the experience & live game reps to consistently under their assignments especially in pass pro. Usually your better offensive line units in college football are upperclassmen across the board. When there's interior offensive line inexperience & a QB gets pressure right in his face almost immediately, there's going to be issues.

Injuries. Having Dellinger & Adams out during the meat part of the schedule played a major role in the offensive play. Their injuries just so happened to occur during the meat part of the SEC schedule.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 3:22 pm
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
24442 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:27 pm to
Good analysis BigBrod81
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22535 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:34 pm to
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
33977 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Someone posted a run play of TDP from when he set the record in the single game rushing record in the 2021 Florida game.


Your mention of the 2021 Florida game is ironically appropriate for this discussion. Before that game LSU had a pretty bad rushing offense. I think TDP was last in the SEC in yards per carry (or close to it). Vs. Florida they started to run more counters. Brought in a TE who could block. Instead of the zone scheme they ran in the "Joe Brady" offense with CEH, the realized TDP was a completely different back with different strengths and played to them. LSU adjusted their approach to fit the the strengths of their personnel and it paid dividends. TDP became a 1000 yard rusher that season

Sloan/BK never really adjusted their approach to the running game this year. They just, at times, lamented the fact Nuss wouldn't keep the ball on read-option type plays. We guys, I hate to break it to you. He's not Jayden Daniels. And if your QB is uncomfortable or unwilling to do something that is not his strong suit adjust to something that fits what your players do best
Posted by ramchallenge
Member since Nov 2009
3536 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:48 pm to
My root cause analysis as a former coach on the h.s. level indicates the center position is the key on the oline. He calls blocking schemes for the linemen, per each play. Physically, he must have leg strength and upper body strength, so as not to be pushed back into the QB and the backfield and thrust forward and push back defensive linemen.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
168569 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

The Center struggled and the approach to the running game was poor and predictable.


Yup. The whole interior was pretty meh.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
24482 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

The Center struggled and the approach to the running game was poor and predictable. Nussmeier was unwilling to be a factor in the running game approach, which helped make it easy to defend. Later in the season the interior pass-pro struggled because you had a below-average center playing along side a RS Freshmen LG making his first starts.

There's your root cause. No experts or expensive consultants needed. It's not rocket science. It's football.


I'll go ahead and call you an expert, because my replies to your observations are yes, yes, yes, and yes

And as you know already I'm sure, the coaches don't need to be told.

Unfortunately for us, we were seeing what was our best chance to succeed. Changes are necessary, and I think if Nuss comes out Game 1 at Clemson and shows the same grit and determination translated to running the ball when necessary, we will see the desired outcome.
Posted by Amused Lurker
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2015
2142 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:18 pm to
In your root cause, did you note that Caden Durham finished the year fifth in the SEC at 5.5 yards per carry and Josh Williams finished about 20th at 4.1 yards per carry? Did the O-Line decide to only block for Caden and not block for Josh? Why the difference?

Also, Caden Durham was the third leading RB in the SEC with 257 Receiving yards at nearly 10 yards per catch. Josh finished 4th at 247 yds.

Caden played through a foot injury this year which slowed him down during the back half of the year. The true root cause was Red Zone running and Caleb Jackson not developing. Holes were there based on Caden’s results, but neither Williams nor Jackson could find them at times.

As Kelly said, it’s all 11 players working together. Individual stats seem to confirm this. Why did Caden average 1.5 ypc more than Josh?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6477 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

RB patience, waiting for holes to open, etc.. Pass blocking seemed good for the most part

It didn’t matter who the back was, we haven’t been able to run the middle in ages & certainly not this year.

Durham does not have a vision problem, yet only successful runs all looked like some sort of stretch play.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram