Started By
Message
locked post

SEC babies whining about SOS and not playing OOC games is pathetic

Posted on 12/8/24 at 8:50 pm
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60681 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 8:50 pm
SEC SOS is mostly a big circle jerk. 8-9 team start of ranked then they play each other and get all these ranked wins. Most of them are not playing tough OOC games to begin with. Notice Bama is not pointing to 5-7 Wisconsin as a big win. Beat 1 of 2 6-6 team and Bama is in.

Ole Miss started the season with Furman Middle Tennessee Wake Forest and Ga Southern. After the brutal gauntlet it’s no wonder they were too worn down to play 4-8 Kentucky at home. Kentuckys other 3 wins were So Miss Ohio and Murray State

Are the SEC babies gonna cut the conference schedule to 6? After years and getting the benefit of every doubt poor Gumps can’t handle one going the other way.







Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 8:53 pm to
So what are you saying?

The SEC teams aren’t good and shouldn’t count as good wins?
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
68463 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:00 pm to
If a team is going to have to play 4-5 ranked teams in conference then the committee has shown they should not play a big OOC game, schedules like SMU get you in the playoffs playing zero ranked teams or even having a single quality win.

Bama, UGA, etc should be begging to only play the worst teams in conf and out of conference for a free ride to the playoffs.

SOS no longer matters, and since there is no system like basketball and baseball have you should play scrubs all year long now.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 9:01 pm
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28984 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Notice Bama is not pointing to 5-7 Wisconsin as a big win.


Believe it or not, a couple of them were last night
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119492 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:09 pm to
Know how you treat your fans? You ask them to donate for player’s salaries and cut one of the 9 games worth a shite on a 12 game schedule.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

SOS no longer matters

Well this is stupid lol
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29544 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:20 pm to
Member when you thought TCU was comparable to a top SEC team then 65-7 happened. I member.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36852 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Bama, UGA, etc should be begging to only play the worst teams in conf and out of conference for a free ride to the playoffs.


Where were Vanderbilt and Oklahoma in conference this year? Bama did play them…

…and it’s why they are out?

Bama doesn’t get their way one damn year, thanks to their own fault, and everyone loses their minds. It’s hilarious
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 10:32 pm
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
17094 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

If a team is going to have to play 4-5 ranked teams in conference then the committee has shown they should not play a big OOC game, schedules like SMU get you in the playoffs playing zero ranked teams or even having a single quality win


That's not true though. SOS does matter. But not losing games also matter. Why do you think 1-loss Indiana is at #10, below multiple 2-loss teams? It's due to their weaker SOS. Why do you think 2-loss UGA is over Boise and Arizona? It's due to their SOS.

When comparing 2 teams with equal number of losses, the team with a tougher SOS gets the nod. For teams with 1 more loss, the team with 1 more loss will usually still get the nod with a tougher SOS. However, when a team has 2 or more losses, having a tougher SOS will not make up the gap for losing 2 additional games.

In other words, if Bama does not lose to Oklahoma, they are almost undoubtedly in the playoffs. If Ole Miss doesn't lose to Florida, they're almost undoubtedly in the playoffs.

Despite what people say, the regular season most definitely still counts.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 9:30 pm
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
9089 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Where were Vanderbilt and Oklahoma on conference this year?


Oklahoma and Vanderbilt played the #4 and #8 strength of schedules.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Oklahoma and Vanderbilt played the #4 and #8 strength of schedules.

Lol you still crying about bama losing to two 6-6 teams?
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
78147 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:33 pm to
SOS is fugazi. All the sec teams are preseason ranked high and it inflates SOS.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

All the sec teams are preseason ranked high and it inflates SOS.

How do preseason rankings factor into current team evaluations?
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
78147 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:36 pm to
I’m talking about strength of schedule
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
9089 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Lol you still crying about bama losing to two 6-6 teams?


Maybe playing such difficult schedules helped contribute to their 6-6 record? Maybe?
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

All the sec teams are preseason ranked high and it inflates SOS.

Yea you’re talking about sos and how it relates to pre season rankings.

So I’ll ask again, how are pre season rankings linked to current team evaluations and sos?
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Maybe playing such difficult schedules helped contribute to their 6-6 record? Maybe?

Or they are just mediocre teams lol

What about the teams that had 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 sos? By your logic, those teams should also have records similar to 6-6.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
38309 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:43 pm to
Yeah, it’s been a shameful day for SEC media coverage

Bama didn’t lose tough OOC games, they lost two conference games to below average competition, one of them was a complete blowout

Add in another loss and that’s that.

Maybe a topic for another thread, but I’m not sure we have ample evidence that the SEC is even that good this season.
Posted by cascadia
Georgia
Member since Jan 2014
2514 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:48 pm to
They played some. Just doesn’t help when you lose them
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS (mountain time)
Member since Mar 2004
71947 posts
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

So what are you saying?

The SEC teams aren’t good and shouldn’t count as good wins?


Glad the committee saw through your bullshite for once
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram