Is this trade veto worthy?

Any future picks or anything? Keeper ability?

I’d probably like to know what they are thinking.

I hate when people veto. But the only real justification for that is if someone needs a WR THIS weekend.

Seems sketch by the last place team

Bowers just went through his bye and they held, do they have another TE 1?

I would have serious questions and better get some answers. That's some bullshite.

Does the last place team even have a shot at the playoffs? If not, they shouldn’t be trading.

They’re making their team significantly worse and I’m guessing Evans and Bowers are both upgrades for the first place teams.

As a league mate, I’d be pissed.

ETA: Looking further, this definitely needs to be put to a league vote. Last place team is basically roster dumping.

Evans >>> Waddle
Bowers >>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever waiver TE
Chargers D >>> Ravens D

i actually traded bowers away with andrews for two rbs in white and dowdle.

at first my league thought i was the questionable one trading away bowers, but rb was impossible to find. te is somewhat easy to replace streaming.

when they actually saw my team and the lack of rbs they understood it.

both white and dowdle did really well for me two weeks ago.

with that said, this trade here makes no sense. i also don't like the idea of vetoing unless it's really lopsided. this does seem questionable, but i guess they don't feel like they can wait on evans. that's a shame though. they should be able to pull more for him.

i tried to trade for evans this week in one league and the owner wanted my kyren williams. screw that.

Ravens D doesn't matter, QBs are a wash I think (unless Richardson is expected to start again?).... Waddle for bowers and Evans is straight up rape.

I am really trying to think outside the box here. Maybe he thinks Tyreek Hill will get shutdown making room for more Waddle targets. Maybe Tyreek could get surgery if they shut it down. And then he is also desperate for a WR now.

I would probably ask the guy in a chat setting about his thinking here.

I hate when trades are vetoed, but it is hard to justify that as anything but collusion.

quote:

---

last place team shouldn’t be trading at all unless there is a punishment for last place

---

Can’t force a team to give up if they are still alive to make the playoffs.

For this trade in particular, the owner needs to explain himself regarding the trade. This trade is lopsided and should be vetoed if they don’t have good reasoning.

Is the last place team mathematically eliminated from the playoff picture?