- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The more I listen to JD Vance the more comfortable I am with MAGA
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:05 am
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:05 am
post-DJT. I had my reservations but this is one smart, articulate, appropriately combative VP candidate
7
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:06 am to wfallstiger
JD will be president one day.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:07 am to oldskule
quote:
JD will be president one day.
I suppose he's young enough to change his public persona again and possibly win in 2036.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:08 am to wfallstiger
He puts MAGA into articulate form.
He explains it very well.
He explains it very well.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:09 am to wfallstiger
Vance is playing MAGA.
Thats not his roots
Thats not his roots
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
He came across as very likable on Theo’s pod last week
They just shot the shite for 90 minutes
It was like two buddies at a bar
They just shot the shite for 90 minutes
It was like two buddies at a bar
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:12 am to dallastiger55
I am going to listen to some of that and the Tim Dillon pod
JD has this weird over-practiced and annunciated delivery that is very practiced/fake (this seems more Silicon Valley not necessarily political. He went through IB/PE boot camp for sure). I'm curious how he comes off in those environments.
JD has this weird over-practiced and annunciated delivery that is very practiced/fake (this seems more Silicon Valley not necessarily political. He went through IB/PE boot camp for sure). I'm curious how he comes off in those environments.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:show me on the doll where weird Vance touched you
suppose he's young enough to change his public persona again and possibly win in 2036
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
suppose he's young enough to change his public persona again and possibly win in 2036.
He’ll beat Newsome in 28
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:15 am to RogerTheShrubber
Trumpist MAGA is not his roots.
American populism is his roots, pretty sure.
American populism is his roots, pretty sure.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:16 am to CAD703X
quote:
show me on the doll where weird Vance touched you
What you quoted is in no way critical of JD Vance (other than his shifting public political face, if you want to melt over that, but we have receipts)
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:18 am to Gifman
quote:
He’ll beat Newsome in 28
Newsome lost his shot, like RDS. He's likely dead nationally.
They're going to shift to being moderates and pick a popular moderate from a swing state in/close to the Rust Belt. Shapiro or Whitmer are the 2 frontrunners for this strategy. After the likely midterms swinging things for DEMs, there may be other options by 2028.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:20 am to the808bass
quote:
American populism is his roots, pretty sure.
Being a Rust Belt Republican, probably so..
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're going to shift to being moderates and pick a popular moderate from a swing state in/close to the Rust Belt. Shapiro or Whitmer are the 2 frontrunners for this strategy. After the likely midterms swinging things for DEMs, there may be other options by 2028.
I tend to agree, but then there’s Paul Manafort who thinks Trump winning weakens the D party and as a result the actual radicals seize control and he made a decent argument. So I guess we’ll see
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:28 am to SlowFlowPro
Your of awareness of the Democrat party is stunning. They may shift moderate but it won’t be in a four year span. The extremists in that party are too powerful and it would take a while to purge their influence.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:29 am to Gifman
quote:
They may shift moderate but it won’t be in a four year span.
Exactly.
But youre talking to the guy who claimed trannyism wasnt mainstream.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:29 am to OBReb6
quote:
Trump winning weakens the D party and as a result the actual radicals seize control
This could cause a civil war (that the far Left will lose) and cause the Blue wave of 2026 to not be fruitful, but it would end there.
The apparatus is already moving. The LAT/Wapo non-endorsements weren't random. CNN is openly moving to more moderate positions and sniping MSNBC. Hakeem Jefferies is smashing any talk of thwarting a peaceful transition of power to Trump.
The Far Left is going to be blamed for Trump winning, and rightfully so. That's why they picked Kamala. She was not chosen to win.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:30 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Exactly. But youre talking to the guy who claimed trannyism wasnt mainstream.
When a main pillar of the party is sex changes for kids, it’ll be a while until you return to “moderate”
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:30 am to Gifman
quote:
The extremists in that party are too powerful
They're really not.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:30 am to wfallstiger
do they think its just about Donald? Of course they do but they be wrong all the time.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News