- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Sweeping bill to overhaul Supreme Court would add six justices
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:11 am
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:11 am
quote:
The legislation by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is one of the most ambitious efforts to date to remake the Supreme Court following controversies over rulings and ethics.
A sweeping bill introduced by a Democratic senator Wednesday would greatly increase the size of the Supreme Court, make it harder for the justices to overturn laws, require justices to undergo audits and remove roadblocks for high court nominations.
The legislation by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is one of the most ambitious proposals to remake a high court that has suffered a sharp decline in its public approval after a string of contentious decisions and ethics scandals in recent years. It has little chance of passing at the moment, since Republicans have generally opposed efforts to overhaul the court.
Wyden, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said the goal of the bill is to restore public confidence in a battered institution. He said he hopes to get parts of the bill passed, even if the whole package is not embraced by lawmakers.
quote:
The bill’s most significant measure would increase the number of justices from nine to 15 over the course of 12 years. The staggered format over two or three administrations is aimed at diminishing the chance that one political party would pack the courts with its nominees.
During the rollout, each president would approve justices in the first and third year of their terms.
The bill would also require a ruling by two-thirds of the high court and the circuit courts of appeals, rather than a simple majority, to overturn a law passed by Congress. Wyden said the current court has been too quick to discard precedent and curtail rights by narrow majorities.
LINK
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:11 am to 4cubbies
Are you in favor of adding justices to the court yes or no?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:12 am to 4cubbies
I wonder how they are going to cheat this through.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:12 am to 4cubbies
Who de gonna git 2 vote 4 dat?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:13 am to tide06
i don't know. I haven't really thought about it.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:13 am to captainFid
quote:
Who de gonna git 2 vote 4 dat?
Congress.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:13 am to 4cubbies
Only an idiot would support this crap
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:13 am to 4cubbies
In other words, Democrats seeking to add more party seats to Politburo.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:15 am to 4cubbies
Harris is in favor.
Schumer is in favor.
You won’t commit to thinking it’s not a good idea to add justices at will?
How do you suspect that would play out long term?
Schumer is in favor.
You won’t commit to thinking it’s not a good idea to add justices at will?
How do you suspect that would play out long term?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:15 am to 4cubbies
quote:
the goal of the bill is to restore public confidence in a battered institution
Maybe he should work on restoring confidence in Congress?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:16 am to 4cubbies
quote:
controversies over rulings and ethics.
Lololololololololololololololol
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:16 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Only an idiot would support this crap
4chubbies
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:17 am to tide06
quote:
You won’t commit to thinking it’s not a good idea to add justices at will?
I honestly don't think much about federal politics. Sorry?
quote:
How do you suspect that would play out long term?
It's hard to imagine a bigger shitshow than what we already have, but anything is possible.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:17 am to 4cubbies
This would be the death blow to the USA.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:17 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I honestly don't think much about federal politics. Sorry?
You posted the thread.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:18 am to 4cubbies
quote:
i don't know. I haven't really thought about it.
Play pretend and say Trump is in the WH. Would you be for it?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:18 am to 4cubbies
quote:No. This effectively ends the court as an equal branch of government.
During the rollout, each president would approve justices in the first and third year of their terms.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:18 am to 4cubbies
quote:
It's hard to imagine a bigger shitshow than what we already have, but anything is possible.
Typical liberal
When you’re getting beat, just change the rules because you’re too much of a pussy to put in the effort to win
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:19 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I honestly don't think much about federal politics. Sorry?
You can understand my confusion when you’re posting about the topic on a political message board.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:19 am to 4cubbies
What I would love to see happen is for it to pass, then get challenged and go through the courts and then have the Supreme Court strike it down. Of course it would be for actual unconstitutionality of things within the bill, but the D's heads would explode. I love seeing that
Popular
Back to top

58












