- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Incompetence or intentional - where do you stand right now?
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:14 pm
Complete incompetent DEI buffoonery or planned top-down intentionally leaving an unsecured elevated position to give wide open crack to a shooter?
You don't have to be fully in one camp.
Incompetence vs. intentional
50/50
60/40
20/80
Etc.
Curious where most are at this point.
You don't have to be fully in one camp.
Incompetence vs. intentional
50/50
60/40
20/80
Etc.
Curious where most are at this point.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:16 pm to Smeg
incompetence for sure. DEI over time has led it to the intentional route when shite like this happens.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:16 pm to Smeg
Intentional. You cannot be in that role and be that incompetent.
Especially when the reason it wasn’t covered is an obvious lie.
Especially when the reason it wasn’t covered is an obvious lie.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:16 pm to Smeg
my vote is complete incompetence. Seeing the reaction after the shot confirmed for me the DEI SS had no clue what to do. Why would i think these same agents would no how to properly plan for the event beforehand
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:17 pm to Smeg
Intentional.... Using the incompetence part as the cover.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:17 pm to Smeg
35 incompetence / 65 intentional
The absurdity of the "roof was too sloped" explanation tipped me towards intentional.
The absurdity of the "roof was too sloped" explanation tipped me towards intentional.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:18 pm to Smeg
I’m leaning towards intentional
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:18 pm to Smeg
It was either the greatest most incompetent event in US political history or he had assistance.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:18 pm to Smeg
Intentional.
I believe Biden(democrats ) tried to take him out. It was the only thing left they hadn’t tried.
I believe Biden(democrats ) tried to take him out. It was the only thing left they hadn’t tried.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:19 pm to Smeg
Incompetence
But I wouldn't be surprised if some people at USSS would have liked for it to succeed, and I wouldn't be surprised if in some way that crept into the ineptitude that nearly allowed it to succeed
I would be surprised if someone involved in this detail intentionally allowed for or facilitated him getting in position to take the shot, but it definitely wouldn't be as shocking a revelation as it might have been 10-20 years ago.
But I wouldn't be surprised if some people at USSS would have liked for it to succeed, and I wouldn't be surprised if in some way that crept into the ineptitude that nearly allowed it to succeed
I would be surprised if someone involved in this detail intentionally allowed for or facilitated him getting in position to take the shot, but it definitely wouldn't be as shocking a revelation as it might have been 10-20 years ago.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:19 pm to Smeg
Incompetence 95%
Intentional 5%
This sounds counter-intuitive, but it seemed too blatant to be intentional to me.
Also, if it had been intentional I think the SS Director would have been part of the Fall Team. Instead, they're shielding her, which tells me that they are covering their own incompetence for putting her in that position to begin with.
Intentional 5%
This sounds counter-intuitive, but it seemed too blatant to be intentional to me.
Also, if it had been intentional I think the SS Director would have been part of the Fall Team. Instead, they're shielding her, which tells me that they are covering their own incompetence for putting her in that position to begin with.
This post was edited on 7/16/24 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:20 pm to Smeg
60/40 intentional.
We'll never know though because neither side wants to fight this fight.
We'll never know though because neither side wants to fight this fight.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:20 pm to Smeg
Incompetence.
Gross negligence is more accurate though.
Securing a roof from the inside? Wtf
Gross negligence is more accurate though.
Securing a roof from the inside? Wtf
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:21 pm to Smeg
quote:
Incompetence or intentional - where do you stand right now?
Intentionally incompetent. I give you, DEI

Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:21 pm to Smeg
It had to be planned in my opinion, nobody is that stupid.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:21 pm to Smeg
This one is tricky. If they intentionally left the roof unsecured then they knew for a fact that he was going to be up there shooting.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:22 pm to Smeg
Intentional is my guess
This post was edited on 7/16/24 at 12:23 pm
Popular
Back to top

94







