Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Vermont Revokes Couple’s Foster Care License Because of Their Christian Beliefs

Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:18 pm
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
18376 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:18 pm
LINK

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday on behalf of two Vermont families after the state revoked their foster-care licenses because of their religious beliefs.

Inspired by their faith, two couples wanted to help meet Vermont’s “desperate” need for foster families. Pastor Brian Wuoti and his wife, Katy, became foster parents in 2014 and successfully adopted two brothers from foster care. Pastor Bryan Gantt and his wife, Rebecca, became foster parents in 2016 and focused on caring for children born with drug dependencies or with fetal alcohol syndrome. The Gantts have since adopted three children.

Despite a track record of success and high praise from social workers who knew them, Vermont’s Department for Children and Families revoked their foster-care licenses after the couples expressed their religiously inspired and widely held belief that girls cannot become boys or vice versa.

As ADF attorneys explain in the lawsuit, Vermont would prefer children have no home than to place them with families with those religious beliefs. The state applies this policy categorically—prohibiting families with these views from caring for any child, even if the family sought to care for a relative, provide respite care for an infant for just one day, or care for a child who shared their faith.

“Vermont’s foster-care system is in crisis: There aren’t enough families to care for vulnerable kids and children born with drug dependencies have nowhere to call home. Yet Vermont is putting its ideological agenda ahead of the needs of these suffering kids,” said ADF Legal Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse. “The Wuoti and Gantt families have adopted five beautiful children between them, including children with special needs. Now Vermont says they’re unfit to parent any child because of their traditional religious beliefs about human sexuality. Vermont seems to care little about the needs of vulnerable children, much less the constitutional rights of its citizens. That’s why we’re suing them in federal court.”

Vermont’s foster-care system has more children in need than families willing to care for them. Vermont’s Department for Children and Families has even had to place some children with unlicensed families, hospitals, and police stations to fill the gap. Despite the Wuotis’ and Gantts’ well-established ability to care for children, the department revoked their foster-care licenses.

The Wuotis had received high praise from social workers who called them “amazing” and said they “probably could not hand pick a more wonderful foster family.” But Vermont revoked their license in 2022 after they expressed that they could not encourage a child to “transition.”

Department officials similarly praised the Gantts for their faithful service to children in foster care. In September 2023, department officials asked them to help in an emergency and adopt a baby about to be born to a homeless woman who was addicted to drugs. Officials said the Gantts were “the perfect home” and the department’s “first choice” for this baby. The Gantts told officials they would gladly take the child. They also expressed concern about the department’s policy requiring them to use inaccurate pronouns, take children to Pride parades, and encourage children to reject their bodies. The department immediately refused to let the Gantts adopt the baby in need and instead revoked their license.

...
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
1590 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:30 pm to
Yeah man. Those Christians are bad news. We’ve got to get rid of them, so we can finally achieve our utopian dreams of subjective truth and morality. What could go wrong?
Posted by TheBoo
South to Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
5329 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:32 pm to
Uhh Bill of Rights says hello??
Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
8403 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:38 pm to
I’m guessing they have the same policy for Muslims who are against transitioning kids.
Posted by TexasForever81
Member since Mar 2023
582 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:39 pm to
If they Both had dix there wouldn’t be a problem. Or if they both had on dresses.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57646 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:42 pm to
The state of Vermont's DCF is about to become intimately, one might even say "religiously", familiar with the First Amendment.
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6078 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:57 pm to
The couple just needs pride flags in the yard and a few trips to tranny book hour to clear this up.
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2143 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:13 pm to
Good news. We pesky Christians will soon be gone. They will have the paradise they deserve
Posted by OldFatDog
Member since Aug 2014
211 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:22 pm to
Or, Vermont family chooses not to foster/adopt because they state that they won’t unconditionally love children placed in their care.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
29094 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:25 pm to
What a load of BS.

Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
14325 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Or, Vermont family chooses not to foster/adopt because they state that they won’t unconditionally love children placed in their care.


None of that is inline with the reality articulated in the article
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8098 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Or, Vermont family chooses not to foster/adopt because they state that they won’t unconditionally love children placed in their care.


Believing a person’s sex at birth cannot and shouldn’t be changed doesn’t mean the parents didn’t “unconditionally” love the foster children.
Posted by OldFatDog
Member since Aug 2014
211 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:29 pm to
Yes. Yes it is.
Posted by OldFatDog
Member since Aug 2014
211 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:32 pm to
It literally means that they are putting conditions on their acceptance of the child.
This post was edited on 6/4/24 at 6:35 pm
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
29094 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:35 pm to
Old Fat Dog got bent out of shape yesterday because folks wouldn't call Jill Biden Dr.

Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6078 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

Or, Vermont family chooses not to foster/adopt because they state that they won’t unconditionally love children placed in their care.
You leftists are tiresome.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
16896 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:41 pm to
Gay parents are perfect parents for leftist. To dare bring up children with religious values and morality is beyond what is their acceptable goals
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram