Started By
Message

LSU/Tulane Professors present a proposed congressional map

Posted on 5/6/24 at 4:40 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
102082 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 4:40 pm
LINK

Shockingly, it actually makes sense and, for the most part, follows existing parish boundaries.

But, it doesn't guarantee a black district, so I am sure it's a no go because it is NOT race-based.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
11637 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 4:42 pm to
By guaranteeing a black district, how is that Constitutional? Has this "guarantee" ever been challenged?
This post was edited on 5/6/24 at 8:34 pm
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
52873 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

BATON ROUGE — A collection of four LSU and Tulane professors suggested a new congressional district map Monday that would serve as a compromise between a map created in 2022 and the proposed map that would give the state a second majority-Black district.

According to a court filing, the LSU-Tulane coalition's map would remedy multiple problems the proposed map has. The coalition's map — titled Amicus — includes two crossover districts based in New Orleans and Baton Rouge where Black voters have a fair opportunity to elect candidates.

However, the map proposed Monday has no majority-Black districts.

The filing also notes that the suggested map is not overly race-conscious.



The map is DOA. If there's even a hint it could get serious consideration, Gravy, the NAACP, etc. will be out in front of the cameras screaming about how it's going to allow blacks to be lynched in the streets.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
9971 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 5:09 pm to
This would create more competitive districts. Doubt any sitting members would want that.

As far as minority districts, it may not guarantee 2 dem seats but it gives you a shot at winning more than 2.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432038 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 5:11 pm to
Oh wow Calcasieu gets fricked in that map, as usual

It's getting time to admit that NLA should only get 1 district.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
70791 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 5:16 pm to
Can you post the image of the map?
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
20170 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 6:23 pm to

We all know the political stripe of university profs. They don’t have to provide a minority district to win.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
73140 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

LSU/Tulane


Friend,

What does Mother say about this map? It brings to mind Grandfather carrying me into the voting booth in the days of the old lever machines.
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
8584 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 3:55 pm to
They need to hand this over to the math nerds.

Seems like a computer could spit out an objective map based on location and population pretty easily.

Take the politician factor out of drawing lines.
Posted by FOBW
N.O.
Member since Sep 2016
344 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 5:17 pm to
Since we lost a seat, the only real question is how do you spli up north and central La. N.O., N.O. Suburbs, B.R., coastal, s.west, are naturally aligned, compact districts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram