- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
FTC just announces facially unconstitutional action
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:14 pm
Declares non-competition clauses/agreements illegal. As of right now, the government has just impaired millions of contracts, not even as the result of a fricking law passed by Congress.
Unconstitutional on its face.
Expect an injunction very soon.
Unconstitutional on its face.
Expect an injunction very soon.
This post was edited on 4/23/24 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:17 pm to udtiger
The overreaching administrative state marches on.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:25 pm to udtiger
How are private equity groups going to structure their deals with owners now? Or any buyouts for that matter.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:27 pm to udtiger
quote:
Declares non-competition clauses/agreements illegal. As of right now, the government has just impaired millions of contracts, not even as the result of a fricking law passed by Congress.
This is a state law issue. The states will just ignore this silliness.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:29 pm to udtiger
quote:
Declares non-competition clauses/agreements illegal.
![](https://media.tenor.com/ZttURy99Kn8AAAAM/good-great.gif)
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:29 pm to udtiger
quote:
Unconstitutional on its face.
I missed the part where this is in the Constitution.
Lawsuits will have to be filed for an injunction, right?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:34 pm to udtiger
quote:
Declares non-competition clauses/agreements illegal.
So now I can moonlight doing the same service with personal customers that I provide my employer with no consequences?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:38 pm to udtiger
I've refused every no-compete clause shoved in my face since 2005.
However,
The pussies that signed em should be forced to live by them, just like all you student-loan-ridden-tranny-studies-degree-genderfroot-grads.
FTC,
However,
The pussies that signed em should be forced to live by them, just like all you student-loan-ridden-tranny-studies-degree-genderfroot-grads.
FTC,
![](https://c.tenor.com/nEhFMtR35LQAAAAC/tenor.gif)
Posted on 4/23/24 at 4:34 pm to udtiger
We can not get CHEVRON over-turned soon enough.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 4:42 pm to udtiger
I have a few takes on this:
1. This is a clear overreach of the FTC’s authority. With that said, it could be argued that non-compete clauses which extend across state lines could be interpreted as impediments to interstate commerce. In which case, Congress could potentially legislate rules governing them.
2. The enforceability of a non-compete clause which is signed by an employee as a condition of employment should be zero, but this should be regulated at the state level.
3. Business owners should be allowed to negotiate enforceable non-compete clauses in agreements to sell land or businesses.
4. Businesses should be permitted to enforce contracts which bar former employees from soliciting clients with whom they worked at said business, but only for a designated time period. Personally, I would say no longer than 2 years, but I would leave it up to states to decide that.
5. Such a ban should not include agreements reached via collective bargaining.
6. This is nothing but a campaign hail mary to try and give Biden some pro-workers bulletin board material.
1. This is a clear overreach of the FTC’s authority. With that said, it could be argued that non-compete clauses which extend across state lines could be interpreted as impediments to interstate commerce. In which case, Congress could potentially legislate rules governing them.
2. The enforceability of a non-compete clause which is signed by an employee as a condition of employment should be zero, but this should be regulated at the state level.
3. Business owners should be allowed to negotiate enforceable non-compete clauses in agreements to sell land or businesses.
4. Businesses should be permitted to enforce contracts which bar former employees from soliciting clients with whom they worked at said business, but only for a designated time period. Personally, I would say no longer than 2 years, but I would leave it up to states to decide that.
5. Such a ban should not include agreements reached via collective bargaining.
6. This is nothing but a campaign hail mary to try and give Biden some pro-workers bulletin board material.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)