- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/25/24 at 2:46 pm to David_DJS
quote:
When did the California Republican primary become 50%+ vote receiver take all?
Oct
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:01 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Oct
So it wasn't when Gumbo posted in these threads about the "establishment" changing the Rep primary rules to favor DeSantis, only to learn it was actually Trump that got the establishment to change the rules to benefit him?
What were those changes if they weren't 50%+ vote receiver takes all?
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:10 pm to Jjdoc
Even never trumpers have to agree this is a win for all.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:11 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
The Harmeet Dhillon? The Harmeet Dhillon that got caught secretly trying to change the primary rules in Cali? From a winner-take-all election, to splitting the delegates for anyone getting 20% of the vote. Thankfully the rule didnt go into effect, and anyone getting 50% of the vote gets all the delegates instead
because the only way Trump could win is by winner take all? I mean.. it was so close! Why was Trump so scared? And yes, the Harmeet Dhillion who was about the only competent election fraud suits on Trump’s behalf. Perhaps you would have preferred Sydney Powell? quote:
So she was just going along with Ronmney-McDaniel in changing the winner take all rule, yet you think she would have been better for Trump?
You’re reliance on a single (made up, fake news, petty) issue is laughable
This post was edited on 3/25/24 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:15 pm to RollTide71
quote:Shame iddint?
Would that be the guy that DIDN'T win the primary?
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:30 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:Had he won, the Trump supporters would be supporting him and not constantly here whining, complaining and griping. Guess there is that.
Shame iddint?
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:36 pm to David_DJS
quote:
So it wasn't when Gumbo posted in these threads about the "establishment" changing the Rep primary rules to favor DeSantis, only to learn it was actually Trump that got the establishment to change the rules to benefit him?
What were those changes if they weren't 50%+ vote receiver takes all?
Youre an emotional wreck. I'll type s l o w l y, and number the steps. just for you
1) California was a winner take all state. So if you got 37% of the vote, and no one else was above that, you got all the delegates
2) Hammeet tried to change the rule to to anyone over 20% got a proportional share
3) Thats when the chatter on here started. And Trump wasnt in favor of the changing to the 20% rule. You just made that up
4) Hammeet lost
5) The committee then adopted a 50+% rule. Anyone above 50% gets them all. If no one gets there, then they share based on % of votes
6) Cali is no longer winner take all state. Which passed the RNC smell test
Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:52 pm to RollTide71
quote:
Had he won, the Trump supporters would be supporting him and not constantly here whining, complaining and griping. Guess there is that.
Trump won and the cult is here whining and complaining all the time. Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:11 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Youre an emotional wreck. I'll type s l o w l y, and number the steps. just for you
Emotional? What a weird response. Why would I be bothered about any of this?
quote:
1) California was a winner take all state. So if you got 37% of the vote, and no one else was above that, you got all the delegates
And my question was - when did it become winner take all? The reason I asked is I remembered Gumbo making a big deal about the change to the primary rules when he thought it was Dasantis pulling the strings of the establishment to favor him, when it was actually Trump.
Before Trump got the Cal Rep establishment to change the primary to 50%+ vote getter statewide wins all delegates, California awarded delegates on a district to district basis.
quote:
2) Hammeet tried to change the rule to to anyone over 20% got a proportional share
You’re talking about the response to what happened earlier in the year when Trump got the Republican establishment to change the rules. I’m talking about when Trump did that.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:31 pm to Jjdoc
She failed the party several times...it was time!
Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:59 pm to boomtown143
Good! Maybe the RNC can start doing some good. She ran straight to NBC!!! Enough said
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:19 pm to Jjdoc
Ronna forced out…….water is wet.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:25 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Trump won and the cult is here whining and complaining all the time.
They get upset if someone shares one of his own post on Truth. Which says something, I suppose.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:33 pm to Jjdoc
And just like that other RNC affirmative action hire, she runs her arse to MSNBC to cry. You suck lady. You should have never been hired.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 5:40 pm to Jjdoc
She failed in a high profile job. She should have been pushed out under the concept of performance = accountability.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 6:30 pm to weptiger
I will say that by making everyone who works at MSNBC swallow their tongues while having seizures about NBC hiring her she has done more for the Republican party in her one day of employment at NBC than she ever did as head of the RNC.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News