- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Blaze Journalist has now been taken into FBI custody for J6 reporting
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm giving you evidence/data points to support the defense.
No.
You're idiotically pointing to your supposed support of someone almost a decade ago as proof.
Things change.
People like you become increasingly more mentally ill.
If your defense against the charge of TDS is "I supported him 8 years ago", then I'm much, much, much better at rhetoric than you....that's pretty obvious to everyone.
1
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
He was a Democrat for most of his life for a reason. Just shows how far left the body politic has gone that Trump is considered a right winger cuz he ain’t
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'd imagine 99% (if not more) of people who have TDS, had it in 2016. By being outside of that population, it makes your claim much more difficult.
You really, really suck at this when you aren't cutting and pasting.
I'm not joking.
Outside of citing decided Law, you really, really suck at this.
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'd imagine 99% (if not more) of people who have TDS, had it in 2016.
Based on what?
You just pulled that out of your azz based on nothing but your personal bias.
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are you talking about summer of 2020, or J6?
You're talking about a bunch of traditional/MSM reporters around a group of irrational and violent rioters who specifically were targeting perceived enemies with violence.
quote:You get flak because you refuse to acknowledge thr disparate prosecution of people based on their ideology. I have no idea why that is. I refuse to believe you’re that obtuse. So I’ll let you tell us why if you want.
What does stating what happened on J6 have to do with leftism?
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:53 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
You're idiotically pointing to your supposed support of someone almost a decade ago as proof.
Proof? Your trying to correct my comment that it's "evidence/data points" by spinning that into "proof"?
That's a white flag.
Trump is whatever. He was ineffective and promoted Leftism, so my support of him (as a pol) subsided.
He's just a failed pol. I have no strong feelings about him whatsoever, which is why the "TDS" stuff is always so funny (and a clear sign of either stupidity or irrationality).
I dropped support of DeSantis about 100x faster than Trump
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You do know I was on here celebrating when he won in 2016, right?
You ever heard of a "divorce", chief?
Now I know being a pretend Lawyer and all this might be news to you, but people can start off happily married and over time grow to despise one another.
Your defense of "Durp durp 2016" is really, really, really fking stupid.
Like High School debate team fking stupid.\
PLEASE keep doubling down!!!
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:56 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
you refuse to acknowledge thr disparate prosecution of people based on their ideology
I don't engage in BLM-style arguments, correct.
I don't join the mob because the mob doesn't have the ability to comprehend what they're discussing, let alone how to fix it. Most of them seem to demand rage more than anything, regardless (which becomes hilarious when the underlying story as reported was misleading and created to specifically manufacture rage, the useful idiots).
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I have no strong feelings about Trump whatsoever
You are a gdmand liar....
PLEASE keep doubling down, you fking moron...
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The prosecutorial equivalent of “if you aren’t doing anything wrong, there’s no reason to fear the police searching you”.
If that is literally all that he did, well after the riots and violence, and he acted solely in his role as journo, then this case will be easy for him
Defending yourself in a federal case is all but impossible. You’re going against an entity with almost unlimited resources, and the ability to cost you incredible amounts of money just in responding and discovery.
I refuse to believe you don’t understand that.
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't join the mob because the mob doesn't have the ability to comprehend what they're discussing, let alone how to fix it.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE keep posting.....
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:57 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
The prosecutorial equivalent of “if you aren’t doing anything wrong, there’s no reason to fear the police searching you”.
Amazing that a Lawyer would take a position that so clearly shts on the Constitution....
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:58 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
You ever heard of a "divorce", chief?
quote:
but people can start off happily married and over time grow to despise one another.
Sure. Not all divorces require rage.
People often just drift apart or change, or to describe Trump, aren't the people they pretended to be prior to marriage.
Posted on 3/1/24 at 1:58 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
You are a gdmand liar....
Then post specific comments by me showing my strong feelings about Trump.
Posted on 3/1/24 at 2:00 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I refuse to believe you don’t understand that.
I do understand that. I posted a hypothetical based on an assumption. The indictment still hasn't been released to have a real discussion.
I made it clear earlier that the case can't be analyzed without knowing what the actual allegations entail.
See this is why I stay out of making judgments. Even a brief hypothetical gives the avenue to try to drag me into the mud, when my actual statement/position has already been made clear.
This post was edited on 3/1/24 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 3/1/24 at 2:01 pm to oogabooga68
Trump came on the scene almost a decade ago. He’s not even close to the same person he was then and we’re not living in close to the same country we were then either. We’ve had a lifetime of changes in not even ten years
This post was edited on 3/1/24 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 3/1/24 at 2:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Or are you upset that I said I haven't read the indictment to even analyze the veracity of the claim? I'm sure all of you guys raging have, right?
I’m not upset, nor have I raged in this thread. I’m more surprised, that you advocate for smaller government, less of a police state, and then, appear to have no concern for the current trajectory of this country.
Posted on 3/1/24 at 2:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Huh? Are you really going to argue the DOJ has been unbiased?
I don't engage in BLM-style arguments, correct.
quote:Im not suggesting g going along with the mob. But sometimes the mob is right.
I don't join the mob because the mob doesn't have the ability to comprehend what they're discussing, let alone how to fix it. Most of them seem to demand rage more than anything, regardless (which becomes hilarious when the underlying story as reported was misleading and created to specifically manufacture rage, the useful idiots).
This post was edited on 3/1/24 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 3/1/24 at 2:06 pm to AUCom96
quote:
This nation is governed by evil.
Yep. And they are essentially making any future reconciliation re political divisions...impossible. Their crimes are so egregious, minus 'Equal Justice' and serious prosecution with real punishments, upon what basis does any form of 'reconciliation' and return to faith in honest, future government to be had?
I think they know this. They want it to crash and burn. That is the end game. Not sure I want to hang for what is coming. Either way it'll be a slaughter of one side or the other. There is now middle ground. As of now anyway.
Posted on 3/1/24 at 2:09 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
I’m more surprised, that you advocate for smaller government, less of a police state, and then, appear to have no concern for the current trajectory of this country.
Decreasing the police state is not a to priority for Trumpkins. In fact, they want more criminal laws and harsher ones.
That's why I laugh at their hypocrisy when they melt down about their in-group facing the Police State they promote so much. They had the opportunity to admit their hypocrisy and reverse course, but instead have doubled down (on the out-group of course) while pretending their in-group is a special snowflake.
And I'll say this for about the 1000th time: me giving legal analysis of facts within our current legal framework is not giving an underlying opinion on the case at hand. That is particularly unacceptable to the people who value outrage as a currency. I haven't even been able to get to this point with this case, b/c the underlying indictment hasn't been posted for me to comment (and then get the disclaimer above).
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News