Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Exxon Sues Two ESG Investors

Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:14 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27613 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:14 am
quote:

Exxon Mobil is suing two sustainable investment firms in a bid to block them from putting forward a shareholder proposal that would commit the oil company to further curb its greenhouse-gas emissions and target its customers’ emissions.

In a federal lawsuit filed in Texas on Sunday, the Houston-based oil giant said investment firms Arjuna Capital and Follow This became Exxon shareholders only to put forward proposals that would “diminish the company’s existing business.”

Arjuna submitted a proposal in December asking shareholders to pass resolutions committing Exxon “to go beyond current plans, further accelerating the pace of emission reductions in the medium-term.” Follow This joined the proposal the following day, Exxon said. In a departure from Exxon’s current policy, they advise the oil company to target the emissions of its suppliers and customers in addition to its own.


“Defendants are asking Exxon Mobil to change its day-to-day business by altering the mix of—or even eliminating—certain of the products that it sells,” the oil company said in the lawsuit. Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”

Arjuna Capital and Follow This have put forward investor proposals for more than a decade at Exxon and other oil-and-gas companies.

“With this remarkable step, ExxonMobil clearly wants to prevent shareholders using their rights,” said Mark van Baal, founder of Follow This. “Apparently, the board fears shareholders will vote in favor of emissions reductions targets.”

Natasha Lamb, a managing partner of Arjuna Capital, said investors face economywide risks from climate change.


quote:

The lawsuit comes amid mounting political opposition to some investors’ recent emphasis on environmental, social and governance—or ESG—issues at public companies. Republican presidential candidates including Vivek Ramaswamy took shots at ESG investing on the campaign trail.

A growing number of business leaders are refraining from using the ESG acronym altogether in their public statements. On Wall Street, some firms are closing once-popular ESG funds as interest fades.


quote:

Last year, efforts by investors to push Exxon and Chevron on climate change fizzled out as shareholders struck down numerous proposals to cut greenhouse-gas emissions and report on climate benchmarks, among other initiatives. Almost all failed to garner more than 25% of the shareholder votes, and some received far less support than similar ones had the year before.


quote:

In 2021, Exxon lost a historic proxy fight against investment firm Engine No. 1, which urged the company to prepare for the energy transition and successfully placed three directors on Exxon’s board. In recent years, Exxon has launched a business to invest $20 billion through 2027 in carbon capture, lithium and other low-carbon technologies.

The new lawsuit highlights companies’ increasing use of courts—particularly in the conservative appeals circuit that includes Texas—to question federal regulators. Last month, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce won a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that struck down a recent SEC rule affecting stock buybacks. The Chamber sued alongside two Texas business groups to obtain standing in the jurisdiction.

Under normal circumstances, companies that want to exclude shareholder proposals from their proxy statements submit a request to the SEC. Exxon’s move is an unusual attempt to bypass that process as the SEC during the Biden administration has become less inclined to let companies block proposals.

In the lawsuit, Exxon said the shareholder proposal and proxy voting process has become “ripe for abuse by activists.”


LINK
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 8:18 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103153 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”


They aren’t wrong.

This would be like registered Democrats exerting control over the Republican platform.

Posted by MorningWood
On the coast of North Mexico
Member since May 2009
2787 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:23 am to
It’s crazy ordinary people’s 401ks and pension money is being weaponized like this and most don’t even know
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
13780 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”

Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53798 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:38 am to
I agree with the investors… this is precisely why you acquire that much critical mass of shares in a company, to influence what the company does and focuses on. The percentage the ESG investors own is important here. Is it like 0.1% that everyone should laugh at or is it 10-20% or more?

And being on a public stock exchange means you can’t control who buys in
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 8:40 am
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55427 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

This would be like registered Democrats exerting control over the Republican platform.


Uhhh...that is what you have now. RINOs everywhere.

The entire DC Uniparty is so far left, that Donald Trump is a "Republican". Trump is Anti-DC, but he is not a true Conservative at all.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16976 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”


I'm sure they're trying to do just that, but how do you combat something like this? Shareholders have certain rights, and it wouldn't be much different than the hostile takeovers or big activist investors you see trying to pull strings (Steve Ackman, Carl Ichan, etc.).
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53798 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:45 am to
quote:

but how do you combat something like this?


By buying out shares and taking the company private, though that probably doesn’t happen for 100 billion dollar oil companies
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37751 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Exxon said the shareholder proposal and proxy voting process has become “ripe for abuse by activists.”

Fact.
Posted by waiting4saturday
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
10949 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:54 am to
Good these fricking loons are more worried about destroying companies like XOM than completing their fiduciary requirements for investors.
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
17867 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 9:06 am to
The goal is to push for a world with social credit score for everybody. It’s essentially a ploy to exert complete control on the masses. These entities never gave a shite about the environment or the greater good.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25198 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 9:23 am to
Putin might find those firms to be interesting investments.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
7578 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Good these fricking loons are more worried about destroying companies like XOM than completing their fiduciary requirements for investors.


Are they fiduciaries or just "wealth managers" though. Big difference.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2274 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:40 am to
Actually that critical mass is very clearly spelled out in the bylaws. It wasn’t met. These ESG groups aren’t recognizing that and are correctly being sued for it. They aren’t being sued for their point of view or their objectives. They’re being sued for not following the rules.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
79337 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

agree with the investors… this is precisely why you acquire that much critical mass of shares in a company, to influence what the company does and focuses on. The percentage the ESG investors own is important here. Is it like 0.1% that everyone should laugh at or is it 10-20% or more?

And being on a public stock exchange means you can’t control who buys in


So it would be ok if fundies bought a pharmaceutical company just to take contraceptives off the market? Or did a hostile takeover of Nike in order to end Pride Month advertising or dump Kaep as a spokesperson?

You'd be reeeeeeeing about it and you would have a point.
Posted by AllDayEveryDay
Nawf Tejas
Member since Jun 2015
9478 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

In 2021, the SEC reversed a Trump-era policy that made it easier for public companies to reject shareholder proposals, which—though typically nonbinding—have long been a thorn in the side of executives. The guidance indicated that SEC staff would be more receptive to shareholder proposals regarding issues that have “a broad societal impact” and focus less on an issue’s relevance to a particular company.

SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda said the number of ESG shareholder proposals last year were up 52% from 2021.


Bidenomics baby!!

On a more serious note, these are proposals, so in effect, Exxon just has to not vote for them, correct? Is Exxon suing because they're tired of the bad PR, opportunity cost? Are they worried one or more will actually sneak through?
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53798 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

So it would be ok if fundies bought a pharmaceutical company just to take contraceptives off the market? Or did a hostile takeover of Nike in order to end Pride Month advertising or dump Kaep as a spokesperson? You'd be reeeeeeeing about it and you would have a point.


They would have to buy all of them… sometimes the world and consumers’ views change. The arc of the world is bending toward conservation
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 1:18 pm
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20580 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:29 pm to
Hell yea, frick those commies.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram