- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Exxon Sues Two ESG Investors
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:14 am
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:14 am
quote:
Exxon Mobil is suing two sustainable investment firms in a bid to block them from putting forward a shareholder proposal that would commit the oil company to further curb its greenhouse-gas emissions and target its customers’ emissions.
In a federal lawsuit filed in Texas on Sunday, the Houston-based oil giant said investment firms Arjuna Capital and Follow This became Exxon shareholders only to put forward proposals that would “diminish the company’s existing business.”
Arjuna submitted a proposal in December asking shareholders to pass resolutions committing Exxon “to go beyond current plans, further accelerating the pace of emission reductions in the medium-term.” Follow This joined the proposal the following day, Exxon said. In a departure from Exxon’s current policy, they advise the oil company to target the emissions of its suppliers and customers in addition to its own.
“Defendants are asking Exxon Mobil to change its day-to-day business by altering the mix of—or even eliminating—certain of the products that it sells,” the oil company said in the lawsuit. Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”
Arjuna Capital and Follow This have put forward investor proposals for more than a decade at Exxon and other oil-and-gas companies.
“With this remarkable step, ExxonMobil clearly wants to prevent shareholders using their rights,” said Mark van Baal, founder of Follow This. “Apparently, the board fears shareholders will vote in favor of emissions reductions targets.”
Natasha Lamb, a managing partner of Arjuna Capital, said investors face economywide risks from climate change.
quote:
The lawsuit comes amid mounting political opposition to some investors’ recent emphasis on environmental, social and governance—or ESG—issues at public companies. Republican presidential candidates including Vivek Ramaswamy took shots at ESG investing on the campaign trail.
A growing number of business leaders are refraining from using the ESG acronym altogether in their public statements. On Wall Street, some firms are closing once-popular ESG funds as interest fades.
quote:
Last year, efforts by investors to push Exxon and Chevron on climate change fizzled out as shareholders struck down numerous proposals to cut greenhouse-gas emissions and report on climate benchmarks, among other initiatives. Almost all failed to garner more than 25% of the shareholder votes, and some received far less support than similar ones had the year before.
quote:
In 2021, Exxon lost a historic proxy fight against investment firm Engine No. 1, which urged the company to prepare for the energy transition and successfully placed three directors on Exxon’s board. In recent years, Exxon has launched a business to invest $20 billion through 2027 in carbon capture, lithium and other low-carbon technologies.
The new lawsuit highlights companies’ increasing use of courts—particularly in the conservative appeals circuit that includes Texas—to question federal regulators. Last month, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce won a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that struck down a recent SEC rule affecting stock buybacks. The Chamber sued alongside two Texas business groups to obtain standing in the jurisdiction.
Under normal circumstances, companies that want to exclude shareholder proposals from their proxy statements submit a request to the SEC. Exxon’s move is an unusual attempt to bypass that process as the SEC during the Biden administration has become less inclined to let companies block proposals.
In the lawsuit, Exxon said the shareholder proposal and proxy voting process has become “ripe for abuse by activists.”
LINK
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 8:18 am
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:21 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”
They aren’t wrong.
This would be like registered Democrats exerting control over the Republican platform.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:23 am to ragincajun03
It’s crazy ordinary people’s 401ks and pension money is being weaponized like this and most don’t even know
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:33 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”

Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:38 am to ragincajun03
I agree with the investors… this is precisely why you acquire that much critical mass of shares in a company, to influence what the company does and focuses on. The percentage the ESG investors own is important here. Is it like 0.1% that everyone should laugh at or is it 10-20% or more?
And being on a public stock exchange means you can’t control who buys in
And being on a public stock exchange means you can’t control who buys in
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 8:40 am
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:42 am to teke184
quote:
This would be like registered Democrats exerting control over the Republican platform.
Uhhh...that is what you have now. RINOs everywhere.
The entire DC Uniparty is so far left, that Donald Trump is a "Republican". Trump is Anti-DC, but he is not a true Conservative at all.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:43 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Their goal, it alleged, is “to force Exxon Mobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely.”
I'm sure they're trying to do just that, but how do you combat something like this? Shareholders have certain rights, and it wouldn't be much different than the hostile takeovers or big activist investors you see trying to pull strings (Steve Ackman, Carl Ichan, etc.).
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:45 am to rintintin
quote:
but how do you combat something like this?
By buying out shares and taking the company private, though that probably doesn’t happen for 100 billion dollar oil companies
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:50 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Exxon said the shareholder proposal and proxy voting process has become “ripe for abuse by activists.”
Fact.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 8:54 am to ragincajun03
Good these fricking loons are more worried about destroying companies like XOM than completing their fiduciary requirements for investors.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 9:06 am to ragincajun03
The goal is to push for a world with social credit score for everybody. It’s essentially a ploy to exert complete control on the masses. These entities never gave a shite about the environment or the greater good.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 9:23 am to ragincajun03
Putin might find those firms to be interesting investments.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 9:35 am to waiting4saturday
quote:
Good these fricking loons are more worried about destroying companies like XOM than completing their fiduciary requirements for investors.
Are they fiduciaries or just "wealth managers" though. Big difference.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:40 am to chalmetteowl
Actually that critical mass is very clearly spelled out in the bylaws. It wasn’t met. These ESG groups aren’t recognizing that and are correctly being sued for it. They aren’t being sued for their point of view or their objectives. They’re being sued for not following the rules.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:49 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
agree with the investors… this is precisely why you acquire that much critical mass of shares in a company, to influence what the company does and focuses on. The percentage the ESG investors own is important here. Is it like 0.1% that everyone should laugh at or is it 10-20% or more?
And being on a public stock exchange means you can’t control who buys in
So it would be ok if fundies bought a pharmaceutical company just to take contraceptives off the market? Or did a hostile takeover of Nike in order to end Pride Month advertising or dump Kaep as a spokesperson?
You'd be reeeeeeeing about it and you would have a point.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:53 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
In 2021, the SEC reversed a Trump-era policy that made it easier for public companies to reject shareholder proposals, which—though typically nonbinding—have long been a thorn in the side of executives. The guidance indicated that SEC staff would be more receptive to shareholder proposals regarding issues that have “a broad societal impact” and focus less on an issue’s relevance to a particular company.
SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda said the number of ESG shareholder proposals last year were up 52% from 2021.
Bidenomics baby!!
On a more serious note, these are proposals, so in effect, Exxon just has to not vote for them, correct? Is Exxon suing because they're tired of the bad PR, opportunity cost? Are they worried one or more will actually sneak through?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:16 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
So it would be ok if fundies bought a pharmaceutical company just to take contraceptives off the market? Or did a hostile takeover of Nike in order to end Pride Month advertising or dump Kaep as a spokesperson? You'd be reeeeeeeing about it and you would have a point.
They would have to buy all of them… sometimes the world and consumers’ views change. The arc of the world is bending toward conservation
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:29 pm to ragincajun03
Hell yea, frick those commies.
Popular
Back to top
11












