- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The Globalist ‘Final Solution’
Posted on 12/22/23 at 9:24 am
Posted on 12/22/23 at 9:24 am
The Globalist ‘Final Solution’
As horrific as the Nazis were, today there is another group who seek a “final solution” even more terrifying: they want to eliminate over 7 billion people from the face of the Earth. In a 2017 interview, Dennis Meadows, co-author of the Club of Rome’s Limits to Growth, said the Earth’s population needs to be “brought back down to one billion.” The current global population is over 8 billion.
Their idea isn’t new; it reaches back over 200 years, to Thomas Malthus’s 1798 “Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society.” Malthus concluded that un-managed population growth would inevitably lead to a catastrophic societal collapse and advocated for limiting reproduction of “undesirables.”
--------------------------------------
But birth control and abortion are a long, slow process for eliminating what is now a 7-billion-people “excess” in the eyes of the de-population globalists. Mass starvation is faster and more effective, and Agenda 2030 will achieve that. Read it here, but look beyond the rhetoric to recognize what banning fossil fuels and fertilizers, restricting agricultural emissions, eliminating cattle, etc. will mean in practical terms.
LINK
As horrific as the Nazis were, today there is another group who seek a “final solution” even more terrifying: they want to eliminate over 7 billion people from the face of the Earth. In a 2017 interview, Dennis Meadows, co-author of the Club of Rome’s Limits to Growth, said the Earth’s population needs to be “brought back down to one billion.” The current global population is over 8 billion.
Their idea isn’t new; it reaches back over 200 years, to Thomas Malthus’s 1798 “Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society.” Malthus concluded that un-managed population growth would inevitably lead to a catastrophic societal collapse and advocated for limiting reproduction of “undesirables.”
--------------------------------------
But birth control and abortion are a long, slow process for eliminating what is now a 7-billion-people “excess” in the eyes of the de-population globalists. Mass starvation is faster and more effective, and Agenda 2030 will achieve that. Read it here, but look beyond the rhetoric to recognize what banning fossil fuels and fertilizers, restricting agricultural emissions, eliminating cattle, etc. will mean in practical terms.
LINK
Posted on 12/22/23 at 9:32 am to djmed
What I find odd is, these types of organizations don’t try to hide their plans about the future, but when you share their own words and goals with others, you are considered a conspiracy kook.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 10:36 am to djmed
This is actually old stuff. When I was young they were called ZPG...Zero Pop Growth. They were in favor of catastrophes, war, disease, abortion, etc. Anything that killed people was good, so funding of life saving ventures should be abolished.
We asked them: 'Then why don't you kill yourself?'
Their answer: 'We have to stay alive to spread the word.'
We asked them: 'Then why don't you kill yourself?'
Their answer: 'We have to stay alive to spread the word.'
Posted on 12/22/23 at 11:02 am to djmed
I don’t approve of the Globalist vision of a greatly reduced human population, but whoever wrote the nonsense in your OP is beclowning himself by comparing genocide with reducing birth rates.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 11:40 am to djmed
While I don't agree with the forced reduction of the population, we should stop paying undesirables to breed.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 11:43 am to Tantal
quote:Amen and quit feeding them too!
we should stop paying undesirables to breed.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 11:45 am to djmed
If they were capable of doing it they’d have done so already.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 11:57 am to Tantal
quote:
While I don't agree with the forced reduction of the population, we should stop paying undesirables to breed.
But they want them to have abortions...
And keep vote Democrat
Posted on 12/22/23 at 12:17 pm to davyjones
quote:
If they were capable of doing it they’d have done so already.
No doubt. But that doesn’t mean that they won’t be able to. It just means that they will, as soon as they are able. The boy who cried wolf- was eventually right.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 12:55 pm to davyjones
quote:
If they were capable of doing it they’d have done so already.
Things as big as eliminating 7 billion people need time to plan and implement
Posted on 12/23/23 at 10:05 am to Penrod
quote:
I don’t approve of the Globalist vision of a greatly reduced human population, but whoever wrote the nonsense in your OP is beclowning himself by comparing genocide with reducing birth rates.
penrod be a clown

Posted on 12/23/23 at 10:16 am to Penrod
quote:"reducing birth rates and then waiting centuries" for population reduction through a natural attritive order is one thing.
whoever wrote the nonsense in your OP is beclowning himself by comparing genocide with reducing birth rates.
setting about reducing that population over the course of just a decade or so CONFIRMS genocidal, criminal behaviors by many criminals.
This post was edited on 12/23/23 at 10:18 am
Posted on 12/23/23 at 10:24 am to djmed
Yet, none of those people think they should be the ones who die. A-holes.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 10:33 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
setting about reducing that population over the course of just a decade or so CONFIRMS genocidal, criminal behaviors by many criminals.
If they were killing folks or making folks sterile, then yes. But they aren’t, so no.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 11:38 am to Penrod
quote:
If they were killing folks or making folks sterile, then yes. But they aren’t, so no.
Abortion kills millions or children and the food we eat and products we consume are steadily dropping the sperm count. That’s not even mentioning the ways they are getting people not to produce like; pushing homosexuality and feminism.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 11:39 am to djmed
The club of rome was rebranded recently. They call it the world economic forum now.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 11:58 am to Penrod
quote:
If they were killing folks or making folks sterile, then yes. But they aren’t, so no.
vaccines and covid say otherwise
Posted on 12/23/23 at 12:01 pm to djmed
If all these types got together and Heaven’s Gated themselves I’d have a little respect for them.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 12:06 pm to djmed
I saw a Jeff Bezos interview the other night wanting to place space stations around the universe and it would support population of a trillion.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 12:08 pm to Diamondawg
quote:it's that travel time that is the barrier
I saw a Jeff Bezos interview the other night wanting to place space stations around the universe and it would support population of a trillion.
Popular
Back to top

12





