- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Life Insurance/ investment suggestions for my wife
Posted on 12/19/23 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 12/19/23 at 4:26 pm
My late 30s wife and I had a quick meeting with her FA today about her Single Premium Whole Life policy from 1985 with a current cash value of $132,000 and insurance value is about $400,000. At 80 (40 years ish), it will have a cash value of around $900,0000 and life insurance of about $1,300,000. Expenses are paid by the dividend automatically, so no cost to us.
At first glance, its great. Earning 5-6% dividend a year tax free with the life insurance bonus.
What I can't wrap my head around, is having $132,000 at under 40 tied up in a $400k life insurance policy? Am I crazy feeling this way?
I just have a hard time believing she is not better off getting a 30-40 year term policy and investing the $110,000 or so after taxes? If she died in the next 20 years, her current policy is worth under $700k and we could easily have $2.5-3 mil in a term policy + Investments.
Thoughts?
At first glance, its great. Earning 5-6% dividend a year tax free with the life insurance bonus.
What I can't wrap my head around, is having $132,000 at under 40 tied up in a $400k life insurance policy? Am I crazy feeling this way?
I just have a hard time believing she is not better off getting a 30-40 year term policy and investing the $110,000 or so after taxes? If she died in the next 20 years, her current policy is worth under $700k and we could easily have $2.5-3 mil in a term policy + Investments.
Thoughts?
Posted on 12/19/23 at 4:38 pm to baldona
If the dividends are paying the premiums I would let it sit.
Some people hate Whole Life, some people love it. You can borrow against the cash value if you want.
I have one as part of my portfolio but I'm self employed, mid 50's and max out my tax deferred accounts. It's not for everybody, trust me. Mine is pretty complex and includes short term, long term disabilities along with some other riders. Took a while to set up.
Some people hate Whole Life, some people love it. You can borrow against the cash value if you want.
I have one as part of my portfolio but I'm self employed, mid 50's and max out my tax deferred accounts. It's not for everybody, trust me. Mine is pretty complex and includes short term, long term disabilities along with some other riders. Took a while to set up.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 4:43 pm to baldona
Her FA is an insurance salesman.
You're correct. Are you saying you'll pay taxes on the cash value? Because more than likely you won't have taxes depending on how much you've put in.
Whole life versus term is a hot topic on here, but for normal citizens without generational wealth, it's best to go with the plan you've laid out.
quote:
I just have a hard time believing she is not better off getting a 30-40 year term policy and investing the $110,000 or so after taxes? If she died in the next 20 years, her current policy is worth under $700k and we could easily have $2.5-3 mil in a term policy + Investments.
You're correct. Are you saying you'll pay taxes on the cash value? Because more than likely you won't have taxes depending on how much you've put in.
Whole life versus term is a hot topic on here, but for normal citizens without generational wealth, it's best to go with the plan you've laid out.
This post was edited on 12/19/23 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 12/19/23 at 4:47 pm to XenScott
quote:
You can borrow against the cash value if you want.
And it ain’t for free. Salesman love to push this idea of “infinite banking” and then never explain what the interest rates would be once you borrow and how it’ll start killing the policy.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 4:47 pm to baldona
quote:IMO, you got the idea. Go with term when young. Wean that back as your assets grow. Self-insure when you're assets warrant it.
Thoughts?
Posted on 12/19/23 at 4:48 pm to REB BEER
quote:
Because more than likely you won't have taxes
He will pay taxes on the interest. He will have taxes.
OP should take any advice he gets with a grain of salt. No one has enough information about him to give advice.
This post was edited on 12/19/23 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 12/19/23 at 5:10 pm to baldona
What was the single premium if you don't mind me asking?
That would give you information on the tax liability if you surrender the policy.
You definitely should be able to outperform the life insurance "investment" if you prefer to assume risk in the market (even if you have a hefty haircut from uncle sam).
I presume her health is great (it is kind of a big deal if you are applying for a new policy).
That would give you information on the tax liability if you surrender the policy.
You definitely should be able to outperform the life insurance "investment" if you prefer to assume risk in the market (even if you have a hefty haircut from uncle sam).
I presume her health is great (it is kind of a big deal if you are applying for a new policy).
Posted on 12/19/23 at 5:44 pm to meansonny
quote:
What was the single premium if you don't mind me asking?
That would give you information on the tax liability if you surrender the policy.
I would also ask who took out the policy on his wife. Was it aparent?
Posted on 12/19/23 at 5:58 pm to La Place Mike
Im sure it was a parent or grandparent.
I don't think an underwriter would approve many other options.
I don't think an underwriter would approve many other options.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 6:43 pm to meansonny
quote:
Im sure it was a parent or grandparent.
If that is the case and I am thinking it is then the entire amount is taxable.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:01 pm to La Place Mike
Everything over the initial single payment.
Yes.
Yes.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:40 pm to La Place Mike
I missed the part about the single premium. Whatever he chooses, in the long run it’s probably best to take the cash value. Hopefully he’ll come back with more info.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 11:47 pm to baldona
We just cashed in 2 whole life contracts after about 25 years. I figured we were earning about 1% maybe a year. At the time in the early part of our marriage we thought we needed it for helping the surviving spouse with mortgage etc
25 years later we don’t need it and I’d rather invest the cash and use the premium amount we were paying to apply it to the mortgage
25 years later we don’t need it and I’d rather invest the cash and use the premium amount we were paying to apply it to the mortgage
Posted on 12/20/23 at 6:08 am to meansonny
quote:
What was the single premium if you don't mind me asking?
Yep Single Premium, paid for by her grandparents the year she was born. It was a great investment option at the time. $10,000 policy.
So value at $132,000 means after tax value of around $110,000.
I guess my issue comes from us having another life insurance for $1mil that’s less than $500/ year.
It’s hard for me to separate the cash value and insurance, and you only get one. The only time the insurance makes sense financially is if she lives to 80+, that just seems like a hell of a long time to keep $100k plus invested.
ETA: i say great investment, idk. If her grandparents buy a mutual fund that tracks the S&P in 1985 that same $10,000 is worth over $600,000 now. That’s the way I’m looking at this cash value. So it’s difficult for me to look any other way.
This post was edited on 12/20/23 at 6:18 am
Posted on 12/21/23 at 7:30 pm to Shepherd88
quote:
Salesman love to push this idea of “infinite banking” and then never explain what the interest rates would be once you borrow and how it’ll start killing the policy.
100% this
Posted on 12/22/23 at 6:29 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Salesman love to push this idea of “infinite banking” and then never explain what the interest rates would be once you borrow and how it’ll start killing the policy.
Then that "salesman" doesn't understand how the the Infinite Banking system works. There are only a hand full of companies that you should use if you want to set up the system without "killing" the policy. If you want to know how the system works read books by Nelson Nash. He started IBC.
Just so you know, and before someone says we found the IBC guy, I don't do the IBC system but I do know some guys that do and if you are curious as to what companies they use to set up IBC they use Ameritas, One America, and Penn Mutual to name a few.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 6:42 pm to La Place Mike
I’ll have to look more into IBC, the policy is with Northwestern Mutual so I’m assuming it would fit the requirements.
I was telling him I can’t wrap my head around having say $800,000 in her 70s and holding onto it for just $1.2 mil death benefit. That’s when he brought up the ability to ‘loan’ the money and at death it would be paid off and the remaining balance tax free.
I guess it makes sense when the interest rate ‘to yourself’ is lower than an interest rate outside of the loan. But if you are risking less cash/ capital growth, I just don’t see how that is ever worth it.
I was telling him I can’t wrap my head around having say $800,000 in her 70s and holding onto it for just $1.2 mil death benefit. That’s when he brought up the ability to ‘loan’ the money and at death it would be paid off and the remaining balance tax free.
I guess it makes sense when the interest rate ‘to yourself’ is lower than an interest rate outside of the loan. But if you are risking less cash/ capital growth, I just don’t see how that is ever worth it.
This post was edited on 12/22/23 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 12/22/23 at 8:21 pm to baldona
I want to be clear I am not advocating for IBC but Northwestern Mutual, while it is a good company, it is not a company that you would use for IBC because it's a direct-recognition company.
You may not think "just 1.2 million death benefit" will be worth it but whoever her beneficiary/beneficiaries are may think differently because you will more than likely be dead before she goes providing that she isn't significantly older than you.
quote:
I can’t wrap my head around having say $800,000 in her 70s and holding onto it for just $1.2 mil death benefit.
You may not think "just 1.2 million death benefit" will be worth it but whoever her beneficiary/beneficiaries are may think differently because you will more than likely be dead before she goes providing that she isn't significantly older than you.
This post was edited on 12/22/23 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 12/23/23 at 5:59 am to La Place Mike
Interesting, learned some new. I appreciate that. So this is what the Google said:
“Direct recognition is a method where a mutual insurance company has separate dividend rates for borrowed and unborrowed cash value. Non-Direct Recognition is a method where an insurance company credits all Whole Life policies with an equal dividend rate regardless if there is a loan outstanding.“
Yeah no way it ever makes sense to “loan money” from yourself if you are losing your dividend.
I’m not saying that $1.2 mil isn’t a lot, I’m saying that my wife is worth considerably more than that already and will continue to do so hopefully.
My thought process here is to do the following with the cash value of her insurance:
1.) ladder some extra term
2.) possibly buy a very small whole life policy of say $250,000 for nostalgia reasons for her grandfather
3.) invest the rest
By the time her term insurance is falls off each step of the ladder the invested portion should be worth more. At the end of the 30 years it’ll be worth more than the current policy ever would have been.
So unless there’s a good financial reason to keep the single premium policy (like IBC mentioned above (potentially)) I can’t see any reason to do so.
“Direct recognition is a method where a mutual insurance company has separate dividend rates for borrowed and unborrowed cash value. Non-Direct Recognition is a method where an insurance company credits all Whole Life policies with an equal dividend rate regardless if there is a loan outstanding.“
Yeah no way it ever makes sense to “loan money” from yourself if you are losing your dividend.
I’m not saying that $1.2 mil isn’t a lot, I’m saying that my wife is worth considerably more than that already and will continue to do so hopefully.
My thought process here is to do the following with the cash value of her insurance:
1.) ladder some extra term
2.) possibly buy a very small whole life policy of say $250,000 for nostalgia reasons for her grandfather
3.) invest the rest
By the time her term insurance is falls off each step of the ladder the invested portion should be worth more. At the end of the 30 years it’ll be worth more than the current policy ever would have been.
So unless there’s a good financial reason to keep the single premium policy (like IBC mentioned above (potentially)) I can’t see any reason to do so.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 6:24 am to baldona
You need to put that out of mind and site, let it do it's thing.
Concentrate on other investments
Concentrate on other investments
Popular
Back to top

7








