When in the history of sports does your current roster determine your standing?

I’ve yet to see standings based on a roster of players…….ever

Just use recruiting ratings and crown a champion every year, no games required

Bama had their shot at the playoffs and they blew it at home. That seems pretty simple

1973 Ohio State and Michigan tied, 10-10.

Both teams were 10-0-1.

The Big Ten ADs voted to send Ohio State to the Rose Bowl, in part because Michigan's QB broke his collar bone in The Game.

quote:

---

When in the history of sports does your current roster determine your standing?

---

Since the CFP was instituted in 2014

What else can I help answer?

quote:

---

When in the history of sports does your current roster determine your standing?

---

All the time in college sports.

quote:

---

Damone

---

quote:

---

Do you have any tickets?

---

I think he's got a couple in section C row 38 for Cheap Trick

What i don’t understand is this talk of who are the best four teams now. Was Alabama a good team last week when they barely beat a shitty auburn team? One great win makes them a complete juggernaut all of a sudden?

I forget what year, but I seem to recall a team in the NCAA basketball tournament lost a #1 seed because they lost their star player to injury. But they weren't excluded from the tourney, just seeded lower.

To the OP though, I agree, injuries shouldn't preclude you. FSU ran the table. I don't think they are one of the best teams, but what I think is irrelevant. I thought Oregon was going to take care of Washington last night too -