- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
BREAKING: Judge Cannon will delay DOJ's trial against Trump in seized documents case
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:10 pm
LINK
quote:
On Friday, Judge Aileen Cannon agreed to temporarily delay the trial brought forth by Biden’s Department of Justice against Donald Trump regarding alleged classified documents taken with Trump after the end of his presidency.
quote:
DOJ's Jay Bratt reportedly insisted during the hearing that Cannon should not delay the trial and that she should "should not let the DC trial drive the schedule here."
Trump attorney Todd Blanche argued that prosecutors need to be realistic about the case, as the classified documents can only be viewed in designated government rooms with heightened security.
"It has been extremely difficult to have access," he said.
Cannon at one point asked the DOJ to provide an example of a time it brought forth two criminal cases in a "compressed" schedule while calling for trial dates within less than 3 months; Cannon did not receive an answer.
11
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Oh wait, so they don't got him this time? Surely they'll get him next time though.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:12 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is the only case that has a slim chance and now it's pushed past the election.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:13 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Cannon did not receive an answer.
surprised they didn't just say "bbbbbut THIS is Different"
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:14 pm to Thundercles
This is actually the only case with even a shred of legitimacy, legally. The only one he should have any worry about.
That is not to say it IS legitimate, just to say the other cases seem to really stink much worse.
That is not to say it IS legitimate, just to say the other cases seem to really stink much worse.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:15 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Makes sense, as the Dems definitely shot their load so many of these. Dem/rino tears are gonna flow on this one. According to Ben Shapiro this seems to be the one that "gots him this time."
So no indication of how long it will be postponed or if there are rules around how far it can be, like up to 6 months increments at a time?
So no indication of how long it will be postponed or if there are rules around how far it can be, like up to 6 months increments at a time?
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:16 pm to TrueTiger
quote:Even more interesting if Trump wins. Can a president be prosecuted in court, if the proceeding began before he became president?
This is the only case that has a slim chance and now it's pushed past the election.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:18 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Even more interesting if Trump wins. Can a president be prosecuted in court, if the proceeding began before he became president?
I would so love for that to happen
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:21 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Even more interesting if Trump wins. Can a president be prosecuted in court, if the proceeding began before he became president?
Could his DOJ not just drop the whole case? But then we could have his nominee pull a sessions and promise not to and will special council it into eternity.
This post was edited on 11/3/23 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:21 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Even more interesting if Trump wins. Can a president be prosecuted in court, if the proceeding began before he became president?
Would have them really screaming if he is reelected and issues a pardon.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:22 pm to RealityWinsOut
quote:Ideally, yes. But Trump would have to appoint someone non-swampy.
Could his DOJ not just drop the whole case?
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:22 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
At last, a judge with some fairness. Anyone who can't recognize the communistic efforts of Biden trying to remove his chief political opponent needs to see a doctor to have their head removed from their arse.
It's sad and funny at the same time. Everyone with TDS thinking any of these attempts to "get Trump" would be different than the others is the funny part. The sad part is that it happened at all.
It's sad and funny at the same time. Everyone with TDS thinking any of these attempts to "get Trump" would be different than the others is the funny part. The sad part is that it happened at all.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:22 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Even more interesting if Trump wins. Can a president be prosecuted in court, if the proceeding began before he became president?
He would just pardon himself and shut the case down.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:22 pm to RealityWinsOut
It would be essentially deferred until he was no longer president, but picking it up again would be at a future atty general's discretion.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:26 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
So this is the source of that sound of reeeeeeing I heard?
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:32 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Even more interesting if Trump wins. Can a president be prosecuted in court, if the proceeding began before he became president?
I think the answer is no, and Trump wins, he can always just fire the special prosecutor and/or pardon himself.
The only hope the Dems have is to get him convicted before he is becomes the President again.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:41 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is an example of why Jack fired up his second case in DC. Trump ain't getting that kind of cooperation in DC and Jack gets everything he wants in DC.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:44 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
This is actually the only case with even a shred of legitimacy, legally. The only one he should have any worry about.
That is not to say it IS legitimate, just to say the other cases seem to really stink much worse.
Yes. It's not legitimate because no other former President, or hell VP, has ever been charged based on this but it is the only one with a shred of legitimacy because taking home classified documents is, on it's face, illegal.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:51 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
because taking home classified documents is, on it's face, illegal.
Not for the one person who has the ability to declass and thats The President.
Posted on 11/3/23 at 2:59 pm to TrueTiger
It’s not as if discovery stops or it’s stayed. If I’m Trump’s lawyers I’m conducting all my discovery there - bc you’ll get rulings that are sane
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News