- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jenna Ellis... Is she being truthful or is she panicking
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:44 pm
The left is ecstatic about Jenna Ellis, the former Jr. Trump attorney, outspoken Bible believing Christian comentator and adamant DeSantis supporter.
She basically testified that Trump attorneys tried to sell a false narrative to the Georgia state legislature in an effort to change the results.
Specifically she admitted to the following falsehoods:
1. Nearly 100000 mail in ballots were illegally cast
2. That 2500 felons illegally voted
3. That 60,000 underage people illegally voted.
4. That 10,000 dead people voted.
In her testimony she declared the above items to be
She spins it like this. She was a Jr. attorney victimized by seniors like Rudy Gulliani who put forth the falsehoods.
In a tearful summation she said "had she known then what she knows now" she would never have represented Donald Trump."
This was all pretty surprising to me because on her American Family Radio show she never indicated false information was passed along to legislators.
But now her testimony is being used to persuade other prosecutors in other states to bring similar cases.
And yet she seemed so Joan of Arcesque on the Radio defending American values and portraying herself as a constitutional scholar and not some wet behind the ears, gullible, Jr. attorney ripe for victimization.
She never mentioned falsehoods on the radio. She came across as a victim of unjust prosecution; an innocent victim cradled in the arms of and fortified
by the holy ghost himself
Yet now she is the leading witness for election integrity and a big time DeSantis cheerleader.
She gets off with a $5000 fine and continues to be a lawyer. Hopefully, she loses her reputation as a serious human being
Maybe I'm being unfair, but am I being over cynical in believing that none of the four points she testified to as being false have ever really been investigated adequately?
If she is representative of what we have out there fighting for our country, then we are freaking toast.
She basically testified that Trump attorneys tried to sell a false narrative to the Georgia state legislature in an effort to change the results.
Specifically she admitted to the following falsehoods:
1. Nearly 100000 mail in ballots were illegally cast
2. That 2500 felons illegally voted
3. That 60,000 underage people illegally voted.
4. That 10,000 dead people voted.
In her testimony she declared the above items to be
quote:presented to legislators.
false information
She spins it like this. She was a Jr. attorney victimized by seniors like Rudy Gulliani who put forth the falsehoods.
In a tearful summation she said "had she known then what she knows now" she would never have represented Donald Trump."
This was all pretty surprising to me because on her American Family Radio show she never indicated false information was passed along to legislators.
But now her testimony is being used to persuade other prosecutors in other states to bring similar cases.
And yet she seemed so Joan of Arcesque on the Radio defending American values and portraying herself as a constitutional scholar and not some wet behind the ears, gullible, Jr. attorney ripe for victimization.
She never mentioned falsehoods on the radio. She came across as a victim of unjust prosecution; an innocent victim cradled in the arms of and fortified
by the holy ghost himself
Yet now she is the leading witness for election integrity and a big time DeSantis cheerleader.
She gets off with a $5000 fine and continues to be a lawyer. Hopefully, she loses her reputation as a serious human being
Maybe I'm being unfair, but am I being over cynical in believing that none of the four points she testified to as being false have ever really been investigated adequately?
If she is representative of what we have out there fighting for our country, then we are freaking toast.
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:50 pm to RiverCityTider
They’re all rats. Maybe she should look at the media clips of her and how she benefited in her actions. Summarizes everyone who wants to work for trump.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:54 pm to RiverCityTider
#1. She shouldn't have made those claims if she didn't have proof.
#2. Trump has a bunch of grifters, hang arounds, and hangers on associated with him.
#2. Trump has a bunch of grifters, hang arounds, and hangers on associated with him.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:54 pm to momentoftruth87
I think she is disgusting, and I think she has actually convinced herself that the election was clean so as to self justify testifying to lies.
And she comes out unscathed, and still proselytizing as though courage and Christianity are mutually exclusive
And she comes out unscathed, and still proselytizing as though courage and Christianity are mutually exclusive
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:58 pm to L1C4
quote:
#1. She shouldn't have made those claims if she didn't have proof.
None of the claims made by the usual suspects the last few years are backed by “proof”. Lots of pseudo-science, “custom algorithms” and analysis of “what could have happened”
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:01 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
None of the claims made by the usual suspects the last few years are backed by “proof”. Lots of pseudo-science, “custom algorithms” and analysis of “what could have happened”
Mail in ballots happened.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:03 pm to OldManRiver
Mass mail in ballots are innately subject to fraud . It's self evident. That's why countries that take election integrity seriously don't allow it.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:04 pm to OldManRiver
quote:People who claim election-changing fraud have the onus on them to prove such. It would seem the enumerated claims in the OP would be pretty easy to verify. So why haven't they been?
None of the claims made by the usual suspects the last few years are backed by “proof”
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:05 pm to RiverCityTider
Rats off a sinking ship
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:05 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Mail in ballots happened.
Absolutely. I was referring more to the type of claims In this post and elsewhere “90k more people voted than live in x county!!!!”
Mail in ballots plus the absolute disregard for election rules in numerous states swung the last election, not whatever BS numbers Russell Ramsland and crew push out every few weeks
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:07 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
They’re all rats.
The best people.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:10 pm to OldManRiver
The point is there will never be an honest official effort to examine the accuracy of the four claims she declared false.
Her testimony makes truth irrelevant. She no longer has to pay for legal defense. She gets off. That's better than going bankrupt to prove a point.
Her testimony makes truth irrelevant. She no longer has to pay for legal defense. She gets off. That's better than going bankrupt to prove a point.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:13 pm to cwill
quote:
The best people.
I mean DeSantis went from debating to sending supplies to Israel pandering for votes. Seems like he has great people too.
Or maybe politics is full of scumbags who take advantage of others …
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:16 pm to RiverCityTider
I can’t decide between or
Why not both
This is as substantive a response to the claim as should be required. For real.
Why not both
This is as substantive a response to the claim as should be required. For real.
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:26 pm to RiverCityTider
She seems to be cashing in the female card.
"I'm just a girl, please don't hurt me!"
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:27 pm to RiverCityTider
She doesn't have a choice but to lie. They'll ruin her life if she doesn't fall in line. This isn't rocket science
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:30 pm to RiverCityTider
She is hoping to sink Don. Only way her boy Ron would ever have a chance in hell
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:31 pm to RiverCityTider
She's finally telling the truth.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:32 pm to SuperSaint
IIRC, she has nice, big tits.
That’s about all that I recall.
And that the 2020 election was most certainly stolen.
That’s about all that I recall.
And that the 2020 election was most certainly stolen.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News