- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Can a single leftist explain how multiculturalism is supposed to work?
Posted on 10/15/23 at 9:51 am
Posted on 10/15/23 at 9:51 am
I have never understood this concept. Is there a single example in recorded human civilization of a nation having multiple cultures, and not one dominant culture? (This is not to confuse with countries having smaller subcultures)
What is the explanation for why native citizens would want "multiculturalism" and what are the benefits it provides?
From my perspective, there will always be one dominant culture that wins out and will seek to dominate that culture. The current zeitgeist in America seems to be pushing a very gay, neo-liberal, marxist global culture that despises the traditional American Christian heritage. But there is no way for both of these cultures to coexist with eachother.
What is the explanation for why native citizens would want "multiculturalism" and what are the benefits it provides?
From my perspective, there will always be one dominant culture that wins out and will seek to dominate that culture. The current zeitgeist in America seems to be pushing a very gay, neo-liberal, marxist global culture that despises the traditional American Christian heritage. But there is no way for both of these cultures to coexist with eachother.
This post was edited on 10/15/23 at 9:52 am
Posted on 10/15/23 at 9:58 am to burger bearcat
quote:
neo-liberal, marxist global culture
How can something be “neo-liberal” and “Marxist”???
Posted on 10/15/23 at 9:59 am to burger bearcat
Guilt and a lack of self confidence.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:04 am to burger bearcat
Well, take India. They have a large Sikh population. But the Indians don't appreciate their cultural enrichment so a lot of Sikhs moved to Canada where they make their enrichment plans in peace.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:04 am to burger bearcat
quote:
What is the explanation for why native citizens would want "multiculturalism" and what are the benefits it provides?
Muh ethnic food
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:05 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
How can something be “neo-liberal” and “Marxist”???
Marxism is just the tool. No country has never really been truly Marxist or Communist. Its more of an idealogy that elites prescribe to the useful idiots to ultimately support the neo-liberal global order.
An example of this is CRT (which is a Marxist theory) being implemented by massive global corporations, who push this idealogy (which you would think would be antithesis to their vision), but do it to further take power.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:05 am to Zach
quote:
They have a large Sikh population
Most Ive met were good people.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:08 am to burger bearcat
Multiculturalism leads to poorer outcomes for society. If emerged as a political concept in the US only because minority groups, found it useful.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:10 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Can a single leftist explain how multiculturalism is supposed to work?
Magic.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:10 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
How can something be “neo-liberal” and “Marxist”???
Neo Libs use capitalist tools to achieve Marxist cultural and social goals. Its done through technocracy.
Even avowed commies finally realized Capitalism was their best chance.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:12 am to burger bearcat
multiculturalism to a liberal: anyone who opposes them is gone
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:17 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Multiculturalism leads to poorer outcomes for society.
Indeed.
Nothing will ever get accomplished with people so fractured.
Libs think muliticulturalism means good food. Literally.
They don't see the political antagonism that comes with it.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:18 am to chalmetteowl
Posters love tossing out negativebuzzwords whether they make sense or not.
“Globalist” “liberal” “Neocon”
4”New World Order”.
“Globalist” “liberal” “Neocon”
4”New World Order”.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:20 am to burger bearcat
It doesn’t work. It’s built on unicorn farts and rainbows. It is ingrained in us to congregate with, associate with and protect those who have similar characteristics and values. It is nature and it is their naïveté and outright stupidity that will tear our society apart.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:21 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Libs think muliticulturalism means good food. Literally.
They don't see the political antagonism that comes with it.
They knew what they were doing
This post was edited on 10/15/23 at 10:26 am
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:22 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:
They knew what they we’re doing
Social engineers, indeed. Rank and file basic bitches, nah.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:23 am to burger bearcat
In fact, it’s perfectly possible for peoples from different culture to co-exist in a country. In fact, that’s been the case in the U. S.since the 18th Century.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:26 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
How can something be “neo-liberal” and “Marxist”???
Wayside stops on the Road to Serfdom.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:27 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Most Ive met were good people.
Yeah, the Canadians are having no problems with them. But the Indians are. They claim Sikh separatist groups in Canada plot terror attacks in India and so India is pissed at Canada for harboring them.
Odd fact...Almost all male Sikhs have 'Sikh' as their first or middle name. It's kinda like all the Muslims named Mohammed.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 10:28 am to burger bearcat
quote:
multiculturalism is supposed to work?
Multiculturalism HAS worked. America at its strongest has featured a conglomeration of diverse perspectives from across Europe. Diversity doesn’t just mean skin color. Ethnicity, religious views, family structures - you can have multiculturalism in a number of different ways.
Outside of Europe, you’ve had tremendous additions to American culture via what black people have offered along with Asians. Asians (notably from Japan, Korea, and India) have been instrumental in medicine, science research, and technology.
Black people have enriched our music and cuisine. Their Christian practices have invigorated what it means to be a charismatic Protestant.
These are just a few examples of how multiculturalism can enhance a society.
The problems associated with multiculturalism come in two areas: ethnocentric attitudes and a progressive, radical Left that utilizes Marxist ideology.
For the Left, multiculturalism isn’t a strength but a technique for identifying existing power structures to be deconstructed. This is why the radical Left doesn’t actually celebrate diversity: they simple use it to destroy “colonial Whiteness.” They use it to argue that systemic oppression exists and is the reason for the hardships that minorities experience.
Does racism exist? Sure. It’s also a problem when trying to cultivate a multicultural society. But, at least for me, multiculturalism isn’t a bad word. It’s actually been a strength, but it’s also been abused by people with particular agendas.
Back to top

34







